|
|
|
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 5:30 am
|
Democrats to ban modern pistols with impractical requirement
Author |
Message |
Guntrader
In Memoriam
Location: Mukilteoish Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 Posts: 11595
|
Throwing range brass isn't a new idea. Gives the investigators a lot more work, but does give up a little bit about yourself. Could end up with a security cam of you being there that day.
_________________ NRA Endowment Member. How did they know my member was well endowed?
|
Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:22 pm |
|
|
TechnoWeenie
Site Supporter
Location: Nova Laboratories Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 Posts: 18385
Real Name: Johnny 5
|
Guntrader wrote: Your kidding, right? Originally used to track counterfeiters with the new high resolution printers. Now they use it to also track leaked movie scripts and other documents. I'm actually working on a book on digital imaging/printer forensics. I can usually look at a printed page and tell you what class of printer that was used to print the document. All have distinctive roller patterns that leave an imprint on the paper. Plus repetitive defects that not only isolate the pattern to the printer, they isolate it to the roller...................used in repairing printers. https://qz.com/1002927/computer-printer ... r-decades/TechnoWeenie wrote: Guntrader wrote: In high resolution color printers there has been a code embedded in the printer and printed on the paper since at least 2004. cite?Written by Keith Collins June 10, 2017 In 2004, when color printers were still somewhat novel, PCWorld magazine published an article headlined: “Government Uses Color Laser Printer Technology to Track Documents.” It was one of the first news reports on a quiet practice that had been going on for 20 years. It revealed that color printers embed in printed documents coded patterns that contain the printer’s serial number, and the date and time the documents were printed. The patterns are made up of dots, less than a millimeter in diameter and a shade of yellow that, when placed on a white background, cannot be detected by the naked eye. It was an honest question. Thank you for the information... I know a lot, but I don't know everything... I knew they used imperfections to prove a certain typewriter/printer typed/printed on a piece of paper, I didn't know they fucking serialized it and tracked it...
_________________NO DISASSEMBLE!Thomas Paine wrote: "He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
|
Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:46 pm |
|
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
So for those who complained that the thread title was misleading, I have adjusted it.
Again, if you disagree then explain why every instance of this law has always been amended before passing to exempt LEOs?
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:02 am |
|
|
Eagle Chaplain
Site Supporter
Location: England Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 Posts: 2954
Real Name: Michael
|
Guntrader wrote: Throwing range brass isn't a new idea. Gives the investigators a lot more work, but does give up a little bit about yourself. Could end up with a security cam of you being there that day. I wonder how it would work with reloaded ammo. There could be multiple codes on one shell.
|
Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:10 am |
|
|
Massivedesign
Site Admin
Location: Olympia, WA Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 Posts: 38292
Real Name: Dan
|
Mike in Wa wrote: Guntrader wrote: Throwing range brass isn't a new idea. Gives the investigators a lot more work, but does give up a little bit about yourself. Could end up with a security cam of you being there that day. I wonder how it would work with reloaded ammo. There could be multiple codes on one shell. Not if it's a primer stamp.
|
Sat Aug 19, 2017 5:43 am |
|
|
foothills
Site Supporter
Location: Hoodsport/Shelton Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 Posts: 3370
Real Name: Don
|
TINCANBANDIT wrote: Alpine wrote: Forget the forensic commentary, how about the physics and functionality?
No comment? he is only interesting in defending his party.... Best comment yet in this thread...
_________________ "The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living".
-- Travis A Kisner
|
Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:18 am |
|
|
sreyemj
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 Posts: 1367
|
OhShoot! wrote: "and to prohibit the removal, obliteration, or alteration of the microstamped code or microstamping capability of a firearm." Gosh, I sure hope criminals read and understand this part or the whole idea is useless.
|
Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:48 am |
|
|
leadcounsel
Site Supporter
Location: Can't say Joined: Sun Sep 7, 2014 Posts: 8134
|
OhShoot! wrote: I'm at a loss to figure out how this a a slam on 2A rights. Gun owners should be accountable for every shell casing left at a crime scene. Law abiding gun owners have absolutely nothing to worry about with this bill in my opinion. That said, I still would be extremely wary to support such a bill. The 1911 was already designed perfectly, and does not need an update such as micro-stamping. Until a criminal figures out they can just go to a gun range, gather a gloved handful of YOUR range brass, and leave it at their next crime scene. The owner of that range brass fired gun is going to have some potentially costly and serious legal problems don'tcha think? Even if it's just being arrested and detained and having to hire a lawyer for a few hours, days, weeks, months... and having ALL of his weapons confiscated for an indefinite period, losing his CPL, etc. The strain that puts on friendships and marriages is inhuman as well... even if later cleared, you are still on records as being titled as a suspect in an assault or homicide. A bar or barrier to some employment. Will also greatly impact reloading. How willing are folks going to be at giving up their brass.
_________________ I defend the 2A. US Army Combat Veteran and Paratrooper: OIF Veteran. BSM and MSM recipient. NRA Lifetime. Entertainment purposes only. I'm a lawyer, but have not offered you legal advice.
|
Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:22 pm |
|
|
mislabeled
Site Supporter
Location: N-Sno Joined: Thu Oct 3, 2013 Posts: 4015
|
sreyemj wrote: OhShoot! wrote: "and to prohibit the removal, obliteration, or alteration of the microstamped code or microstamping capability of a firearm." Gosh, I sure hope criminals read and understand this part or the whole idea is useless. That kind of sums up the chances this legislation would be in any way effective, doesn't it?
_________________ "Hmmm. I've been looking for a way to serve the community that incorporates my violence." -- Leela
|
Sat Aug 19, 2017 1:49 pm |
|
|
Guntrader
In Memoriam
Location: Mukilteoish Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 Posts: 11595
|
Laws are to punish violators, not to stop the offenses from happening. Because criminals.....well, you know......... Corrections officers just keep them locked up, they don't actually correct them. The penitentiary system of locking people up as a punishment is actually a relatively new concept. Not too long ago they killed people for serious crimes and beat and/or publicly humiliated them for the minor ones. Just locked them up until they figured out what to do with them. mislabeled wrote: sreyemj wrote: OhShoot! wrote: "and to prohibit the removal, obliteration, or alteration of the microstamped code or microstamping capability of a firearm." Gosh, I sure hope criminals read and understand this part or the whole idea is useless. That kind of sums up the chances this legislation would be in any way effective, doesn't it?
_________________ NRA Endowment Member. How did they know my member was well endowed?
|
Sat Aug 19, 2017 5:29 pm |
|
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Rottenryan and 81 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|