pictures back up. read sigline for reason why pictures were down.
| WaGuns.org https://www.waguns.org/ |
|
| suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) https://www.waguns.org/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=68 |
Page 3 of 8 |
| Author: | deadshot2 [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
dj_fatstyles wrote: J3434 wrote: it really depends on what you want to make the can for. some designs work gret on certain calibers while the same design works horrible on another. My goal is to make a can that I can use on a .308 and all three of my AR's. I like the YHM adapter/QD design but have something a little different in mind for my "build". Am not all that concerned about the loss of suppression if I use a .308 Can on 5.56, the .308 is the one that makes the big noise I'd like to reduce. |
|
| Author: | dj_fatstyles [ Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
bump for some new pictures in AAC and form 1 sections. |
|
| Author: | Ranb [ Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
deadshot2 wrote: Good pic's and some ideas for a Form 1 but the big question, "Which one works best"????? Those that require a CNC on LSD or just the simple "Freeze Plug Baffle" design? If the freeze plug design was better, then silencers would be cookie cutter versions that sold for half as much. The fact is that complex baffles are not hard to make on a hobby lathe. If you use a deep cone or K (45 to 60 degrees), it is going to work well. Ranb |
|
| Author: | dj_fatstyles [ Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
bump for new pics in silencerco, swr, lesser known mfr (huntertown arms), coastal guns and liberty arms. |
|
| Author: | dj_fatstyles [ Sat Jan 28, 2012 8:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
fuck photobucket in all its shitty fucking glory. any other free picture hosting site out there? |
|
| Author: | Massivedesign [ Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
imugr.com |
|
| Author: | dj_fatstyles [ Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
pictures back up. read sigline for reason why pictures were down.
|
|
| Author: | irongoat [ Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
Quite a collection! As a new suppressor builder -- we have the Type 7 FFL with SOT -- I found it an amazing visual reference tool. My designs range from more or less conventional baffle/spacer configuration to a rather different steel monocore model. The monocore was designed for .22 LR pistols, but works very well -- so far at least -- on full power .223 AR platforms. The only problem I foresee from a marketing point of view is that my suppressors are rather long and heavy. Starting out, I am aiming for effectiveness of suppression and lifetime durability with easy cleaning. I am experimenting with an all aluminum can and baffles, but based on limited personal experience and some of the pix I have seen, I have serious reservations about the longevity of aluminum baffles. I am curious as to how you managed to acquire all those pix. Thanks again! http://irongoatguns.com/NFA.html David |
|
| Author: | dj_fatstyles [ Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
irongoat wrote: Quite a collection! As a new suppressor builder -- we have the Type 7 FFL with SOT -- I found it an amazing visual reference tool. My designs range from more or less conventional baffle/spacer configuration to a rather different steel monocore model. The monocore was designed for .22 LR pistols, but works very well -- so far at least -- on full power .223 AR platforms. The only problem I foresee from a marketing point of view is that my suppressors are rather long and heavy. Starting out, I am aiming for effectiveness of suppression and lifetime durability with easy cleaning. I am experimenting with an all aluminum can and baffles, but based on limited personal experience and some of the pix I have seen, I have serious reservations about the longevity of aluminum baffles. I am curious as to how you managed to acquire all those pix. Thanks again! http://irongoatguns.com/NFA.html David pm sent to you. |
|
| Author: | dj_fatstyles [ Tue May 01, 2012 2:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
new pictures added from iron goat guns at top of second page |
|
| Author: | mosindude [ Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
I just had an accident in my pants... |
|
| Author: | dj_fatstyles [ Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
mosindude wrote: I just had an accident in my pants... they have diapers for that.
|
|
| Author: | dj_fatstyles [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
bump for new pics in Huntertown arms (kestrel 5.56) and form 1 sections (cutaway). |
|
| Author: | robot [ Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
Here's how the new style AAC Prodigy 22 silencer baffle looks like. 
|
|
| Author: | dj_fatstyles [ Wed Dec 26, 2012 8:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: suppressor baffle pics (VERY PICTURE HEAVY) |
bump for a couple new pics from huntertown arms and them getting thier own spot. (bumped red jacket out.) and new pic from liberty suppressors. |
|
| Page 3 of 8 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|