Author |
Message |
mislabeled
Site Supporter
Location: N-Sno Joined: Thu Oct 3, 2013 Posts: 4015
|
The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has denied motions for intervention by the CA AG as well as the Brady people. There's discussion about which avenues for appeal may still exist, but for now it sounds like California just became shall issue. I wouldn't normally link to a FOX news story but this is the link provided by Calguns, presumably until they can put up their own synopsis -- http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/12/new-court-decision-likely-ends-california-restrictions-on-conceal-carry-permits/
_________________ "Hmmm. I've been looking for a way to serve the community that incorporates my violence." -- Leela
|
Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:20 pm |
|
|
jim_dandy
Site Supporter
Location: Snohomish County & Pierce County Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 Posts: 659
|
I'm guessing even with "shall issue", they'll try to resist like Chicago and add enormous fees, time and other bureaucratic nonsense, as well as outright denials for no reason with difficult appeals. Still going in a better direction though.
|
Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:30 pm |
|
|
Michael_Js
Site Supporter
Location: Greater Seattle, WA Joined: Fri Jun 6, 2014 Posts: 202
Real Name: Michael
|
It's far from over! It still can go en banc and back to the Supreme Court - which seems to be what the lawyers want - to put it to rest once and for all. Now, even if/when this passes, this crappy state's sheriff's still have Good Moral Character to use as their excuse to deny permits... then, we have to start all over suing for that! :( So long from over.........
_________________ WA state NRA, IDPA :)
|
Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:33 pm |
|
|
MadPick
Site Admin
Location: Renton, WA Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 Posts: 52032
Real Name: Steve
|
This is good progress. Quote: Brandon Combs, executive director of the pro-Second Amendment Calguns Foundation, which represented the plaintiff in the Yolo County case.... YOLO County? Is that for real?
_________________SteveBenefactor Life Member, National Rifle AssociationLife Member, Second Amendment FoundationPatriot & Life Member, Gun Owners of AmericaLife Member, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ArmsLegal Action Supporter, Firearms Policy CoalitionMember, NAGR/NFGRPlease support the organizations that support all of us.Leave it cleaner than you found it.
|
Wed Nov 12, 2014 3:50 pm |
|
|
kf7mjf
Site Supporter
Location: Olympia Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 Posts: 16044
Real Name: Steve
|
MadPick wrote: This is good progress. Quote: Brandon Combs, executive director of the pro-Second Amendment Calguns Foundation, which represented the plaintiff in the Yolo County case.... YOLO County? Is that for real? The county seat is Swag City
_________________ "I won't insult your intelligence by suggesting that you really believe what you just said." - William Buckley, Jr.
"...steam, artillery and revolvers give to civilized man an irresistible power." -Perry Collins
|
Wed Nov 12, 2014 3:52 pm |
|
|
Benja455
Site Supporter
Location: White Center Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 6489
|
MadPick wrote: This is good progress. Quote: Brandon Combs, executive director of the pro-Second Amendment Calguns Foundation, which represented the plaintiff in the Yolo County case.... YOLO County? Is that for real? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yolo_County,_CaliforniaQuote: In the original act of 1850 the name was spelled "Yola." Yolo is a Native American name variously believed to be a corruption of a tribal name Yo-loy meaning "a place abounding in rushes" or of the name of the chief, Yodo, or of the village of Yodoi. I'm just excited to know that the pendulum is swinging back in CA. Gives me hope about the mess we're in.
|
Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:27 pm |
|
|
mislabeled
Site Supporter
Location: N-Sno Joined: Thu Oct 3, 2013 Posts: 4015
|
Michael_Js wrote: It's far from over! It still can go en banc and back to the Supreme Court - which seems to be what the lawyers want - to put it to rest once and for all. Now, even if/when this passes, this crappy state's sheriff's still have Good Moral Character to use as their excuse to deny permits... then, we have to start all over suing for that! :( So long from over......... I didn't mean to imply everything was happy bunnies, I'm sure there are still other developments that could change the flavor of things. However, there is a statement made by an an individual on the Calguns forum (who says he's counsel for Baker v Kealoha -- another case that's working its way through the 9th) that seems to plainly say that Peruta will be the law of the land in 7 days. Link to his statement is here -- http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showpost.php?p=15244891&postcount=11Let's hope that's accurate and that those in CA can start exercising their right to carry.
_________________ "Hmmm. I've been looking for a way to serve the community that incorporates my violence." -- Leela
|
Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:41 pm |
|
|
Spooler41
Location: Port Angeles, Wa. Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 Posts: 71
Real Name: Jack
|
Good for all California gun owners, hoping it goes off as intended .
............................... Jack
|
Wed Nov 12, 2014 6:22 pm |
|
|
waglocker
Location: Ohio Joined: Fri Nov 9, 2012 Posts: 3924
Real Name: Sean
|
Anytime a Demorat politician is denied what it wants by a court or by judges, crap....anytime in general, its a good thing.
_________________ United States Army, Retired. 2001 - 2023
|
Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:17 pm |
|
|
usagi
Location: Redmond Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 Posts: 601
|
first california, now DC. both were believed impossible.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:58 am |
|
|
deadshot2
Site Supporter
Location: Marysville, WA Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 Posts: 11581
Real Name: Mike
|
Quote: The law would still not allow felons or the mentally ill to possess firearms Wouldn't just living in California somewhat brand one as "mentally ill"? Then again, maybe some are just "prisoners of war".
_________________ "I've learned from the Dog that an afternoon nap is a good thing"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"For he to-day that sheds his blood with me Shall be my brother" - William Shakespeare
|
Sun Jan 25, 2015 7:32 am |
|
|
mislabeled
Site Supporter
Location: N-Sno Joined: Thu Oct 3, 2013 Posts: 4015
|
Update: The Ninth Circuit has just ordered an en banc rehearing of the Peruta case and they've also said they will reconsider the CA AG's motion (and presumably also the Brady group's motion) to intervene. Oral arguments are currently scheduled to occur during the week of Jun 15, 2015.
_________________ "Hmmm. I've been looking for a way to serve the community that incorporates my violence." -- Leela
|
Thu Mar 26, 2015 2:37 pm |
|
|
|