 |
 |
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 8:06 pm |
|
All times are UTC - 8 hours |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Forum rules
Nothing contained in this section shall be construed as legal advice. All members and guests are advised to perform due diligence in regards to laws and legal actions.
What are your thoughts on this?
Moderator: Bill Starks
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 4 posts ] |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
What are your thoughts on this?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Site Supporter   Location: Marysville, WA Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 Posts: 315 Real Name: Jim 
|
http://bearingarms.com/scotus-ruling-se ... ciprocity/
Seems logical to me, but I don't think I would be surprised if hyprocrisy reigns and we're told it's not the same. _________________ Attack Co. 2/75 92-94 |
| Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:11 pm |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter  Location: White Center Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 6489
|
I read this. It makes a lot of sense but there are some subtle legal differences to consider (check the comments to the article). If I were on the SAF staff, I'd certainly be thinking about it.
|
| Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:38 pm |
|
|
|
|
Site Admin   Location: Olympia, WA Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 Posts: 38308 Real Name: Dan
|
Oh, I agree and I would love to see that re-presented to SCOTUS by just changing the already granted right.
|
| Sat Jun 27, 2015 5:55 am |
|
|
|
|
Site Admin Location: Olympia, WA Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 Posts: 38308 Real Name: Dan
|
Also, this is a repost of an ongoing in Workman's corner... Different article, same principal.
viewtopic.php?f=59&t=57077 |
| Sat Jun 27, 2015 6:04 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 4 posts ] |
|
All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|