I hope I have this in the right place..... Also couldn't find any other mention of this in the forum.

Hope someone can tell me this is a....... joke.

A link to a "prefiling notice" to the upcoming 2016 legislative session:

http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/ ... s/2354.pdf

Some idiot brings that up basically every year with basically the same wording. For a couple years they even had a provision to have the so-called assault weapons locked up and allowed for random LEO inspection of that. It won't get anywhere.

1/10 would be bored at token AWB legislation introduced again.

This guy is a regular machine, turning out bills. Take a look at http://app.leg.wa.gov/Mobile/BillSponso ... me=moeller.

He represents the southern part of Vancouver, WA. Maybe he will fall in the river and get swept to CA.

Who would have guessed, it's a fuggin Demorat.

Along with most of the idiots from Western King county, Southern Snohomish and parts of Pierce and Spokane counties.
They probably figure it they keep trying somewhere along the line of of their bills will slip through.

Again and again?

OK.

I guess some would like bonus points for trying every year.

We get to keep shooting them down.

Please go in and click "Comment on this Bill" and Oppose. Thanks.

http://app.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary. ... &year=2015

no link pablo

Link would be helpful

Sorry guys. Tired Friday night, a darn long week, after not working Dec 17-Jan4. Uggh.

http://app.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary. ... &year=2015

Wait - where the hell did this come from? I just saw this HB linked to by Lynnwood Gun & Ammunition on Facebook. Reading this bill makes my blood boil. This is going to be a long year I can tell. Normally I wouldn't stress too much but in this state, the power of the left is scary when it comes to these things.

For someone who doesn't follow the process closely - where is this one at? What's next for it?

Moeller is clearly a dumbass.

This is basically introduced every year. I'd not get too worried about it unless it actually reaches a committee hearing.

It is the cookie cutter bill from one of the Bloomberg groups. But I think just letting your local reps know you oppose is a good thing.

It would have to be cookie cutter otherwise it would require work, and or thought. I have heard Olympia is on a diet for both.

FROM: cycle61
STREET ADDRESS: xxxxx
EMAIL: xxxxx
PHONE: (xxx) xxx-xxxx
BILL: 2354 (Oppose)
MESSAGE: Strongly oppose this bill, this closely mirrors California's ineffective and arbitrary limits on certain firearms based on specific "features" of the firearm or magazine. This does nothing to promote public safety, as the overwhelming majority of crimes are not committed with weapons described in this bill. Additionally, differentiating between a firearm purchased or manufactured prior to the law and one purchased or manufactured after the law is functionally impossible, and no reasonable attempt to do so could be implemented.