Author |
Message |
ANZAC
Site Supporter
Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 Posts: 7251
|
To get things going, here's a blog post I just found on Seattle times, another "let's change the 2nd amendment" article. http://blogs.seattletimes.com/northwest ... s-meaning/I am sure your comments would be welcomed there.
|
Fri May 02, 2014 4:27 pm |
|
|
General Nonsense
Site Supporter
Location: Lacey Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 Posts: 6311
Real Name: Josh
|
Really? I'm not the only one thinking that this is a troll thread to start more arguments about I-594.
_________________ "A man's worth is not proven by supporting the rights of those he agrees with, but rather by defending the rights of those with whom he disagrees." - General Nonsense
|
Fri May 02, 2014 5:02 pm |
|
|
mash man
Site Supporter
Location: Airway heights Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 Posts: 12246
Real Name: Michael
|
General Nonsense wrote: Really? I'm not the only one thinking that this is a troll thread to start more arguments about I-594. I lol'd
_________________ANZAC wrote: That one that says "From my cold dead hands..... will require a background check" He who does not punish evil commands it to be done. --- Leonardo DaVinci When its time to go in: That place of steel and stone. I pray that you will keep me safe, so I will not walk alone. Help me to do my duty, please watch me on my rounds. Amongst those perilous places and slamming steel door sounds. God, keep my fellow Officers well and free from harm. Let them know I'll be there too, whenever there's alarm. Above all when I walk my beat, no matter where I roam. Let me go back whence I came, to family and homeAuthor unknown.
|
Fri May 02, 2014 5:39 pm |
|
|
ANZAC
Site Supporter
Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 Posts: 7251
|
General Nonsense wrote: Really? I'm not the only one thinking that this is a troll thread to start more arguments about I-594. err, what?
|
Fri May 02, 2014 7:52 pm |
|
|
General Nonsense
Site Supporter
Location: Lacey Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 Posts: 6311
Real Name: Josh
|
ANZAC wrote: General Nonsense wrote: Really? I'm not the only one thinking that this is a troll thread to start more arguments about I-594. err, what? Nobody wants to comment on your threads because they all lead down the same path.
_________________ "A man's worth is not proven by supporting the rights of those he agrees with, but rather by defending the rights of those with whom he disagrees." - General Nonsense
|
Fri May 02, 2014 9:30 pm |
|
|
PMB
In Memoriam
Joined: Wed Mar 6, 2013 Posts: 12018
|
General Nonsense wrote: Nobody wants to comment on your threads because they all lead down the same path. Hey hey hey. I agree, it needs more pro gun comments. Anti-freedom, anti-2A comments make me angry.
|
Fri May 02, 2014 9:34 pm |
|
|
ANZAC
Site Supporter
Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 Posts: 7251
|
General Nonsense wrote: Nobody wants to comment on your threads because they all lead down the same path. What is hilarious is that you are the one who keeps bringing up 594 even when the thread has nothing to do with it. Nice job! There are a lot of editorial articles floating around the Seattle press, either about recasting the 2A or reinterpreting it. A lot of it is driven by the hysterical mischaracterization and bias from the press. I think it would be good to bring some counterbalance to those viewpoints. It doesn't always have to be "cold dead hands motherf-cker", but the recurring thread is they typically miss the point.... like that the common thread in all the central/Skyway/wherever murders are drugs/gangs/kids, not guns. And not all of the homicides there even involve guns.
|
Fri May 02, 2014 9:52 pm |
|
|
PMB
In Memoriam
Joined: Wed Mar 6, 2013 Posts: 12018
|
ANZAC wrote: It doesn't always have to be "cold dead hands motherf-cker" That's my vote! I know it doesn't sell well in the media, but I hearken to TinCanBandit's "Compromise" thread of a few days ago. viewtopic.php?f=47&t=39572That thread neatly summed up my feelings, even if it was allegorical. So when quoting Charlton Heston in my quiet inside voice, I pull out the facts and figures (provided by studies and raw data) and common sense (provided by thinking about things) to try to persuade the anti's of their misguided attempt to reduce violence and murder by taking the means of self-defense away from the law-abiding.
|
Fri May 02, 2014 10:05 pm |
|
|
dimes
Location: Redmond Joined: Wed Jul 4, 2012 Posts: 315
|
ANZAC wrote: General Nonsense wrote: I think it would be good to bring some counterbalance to those viewpoints. It doesn't always have to be "cold dead hands motherf-cker", but the recurring thread is they typically miss the point.... like that the common thread in all the central/Skyway/wherever murders are drugs/gangs/kids, not guns. And not all of the homicides there even involve guns. Or just pretend to be an anti and make them look completely insane. Seriously, though. There is not much to be gained by arguing on the internet. What do you expect to accomplish?
|
Wed May 14, 2014 11:49 pm |
|
|
ANZAC
Site Supporter
Location: 12 Acres in Eastern WA Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 Posts: 7251
|
Several of my friends have changed their viewpoint on guns because I took the time to educate them on "facts" and helped them unravel the media hype.
Essentially we need to act as media watchdogs to counteract the anti-gun bias.
Plus it is fun.
|
Thu May 15, 2014 5:30 am |
|
|
|