Author |
Message |
Mediumrarechicken
Location: Puyallup Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 Posts: 9065
Real Name: Richard Fitzwelliner
|
Just got this. What did I do wrong?
_________________ If she sits on your face and you can still hear, SHE'S NOT FAT.
I'm going to type out 3 paragraphs and wax eloquently about a similar story in my life. Pm me if you figured it out.
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:14 pm |
|
|
H2obouget
Site Supporter
Location: Graham Joined: Sun Sep 4, 2011 Posts: 2222
|
There is no rcw 9.91.190. And if they meant 9.41.190....they left out the word "acquire"... Which making your own...would be a means to acquire something.
_________________ What is a Waterbouget? It is that yellow thing in the middle, below my user name.
Last edited by H2obouget on Wed May 27, 2015 8:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:27 pm |
|
|
chipster
Location: North Bend Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 Posts: 319
|
Ditto. Interesting turn of events. Anyone know more?
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:30 pm |
|
|
lunacite
Site Supporter
Location: Snohomish County Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 Posts: 1146
|
I'm seeing multiple other reports of rejected apps as well from Facebook groups.
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:34 pm |
|
|
rstrobel
Location: Edmonds Joined: Fri Jun 7, 2013 Posts: 288
|
same here
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:35 pm |
|
|
Guns4Liberty
Site Supporter
Location: Lynnwood/Bothell Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 Posts: 8577
Real Name: Curtis
|
This is VERY interesting...I'm going to keep a close eye on this. Thanks for sharing.
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:37 pm |
|
|
never_to_much
Site Supporter
Location: Snohomish Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 Posts: 2035
Real Name: Steven
|
Call them first thing in the morning. and ask what the got this. Heres the number ATF's NFA Branch at 304 616-4500
_________________ Everyone that voted for 594 is a motherfucking moron
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:40 pm |
|
|
never_to_much
Site Supporter
Location: Snohomish Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 Posts: 2035
Real Name: Steven
|
lunacite wrote: I'm seeing multiple other reports of rejected apps as well from Facebook groups. Local WA groups or national groups
_________________ Everyone that voted for 594 is a motherfucking moron
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:41 pm |
|
|
WaJim
In Memoriam
Location: Tacoma Wa Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013 Posts: 16607
Real Name: George Bailey
|
Like in the what pissed me off thread...how can they respond with reasons for a disprove with two questions..?
Or am I reading it wrong.
_________________ "Remove one freedom per generation and soon you will have no freedom and no one would have noticed."......Carl Marx
"Let us Cross the river and sit in the shade of the trees" .....Stonewall Jackson
T. Jefferson "....the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. it is it's natural manure"
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:44 pm |
|
|
rstrobel
Location: Edmonds Joined: Fri Jun 7, 2013 Posts: 288
|
The agent has the initials TC, I can't read the rest of the signature... are they all from the same agent? Why would it be sent so late at night? Weird...
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:49 pm |
|
|
Guns4Liberty
Site Supporter
Location: Lynnwood/Bothell Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 Posts: 8577
Real Name: Curtis
|
As H2Obouget pointed out, the message doesn't make a lot of sense. The RCW in question ( 9.41.190) explicitly prohibits the manufacture of SBRs in Section 1, but in Section 2 it says that SBRs acquired in accordance with Federal Law are not unlawful. And since manufacturing a SBR is federally acceptable, I see no reason why the BATFE (DOJ?) would find a problem with manufacturing SBRs due to the RCW.
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:49 pm |
|
|
TimmyF
Location: Redmond Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 Posts: 20
|
Same here thing here, I plan to call first thing in the morning. Note I had the same inspector.
-Joel
Last edited by TimmyF on Wed May 27, 2015 8:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:53 pm |
|
|
Mediumrarechicken
Location: Puyallup Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 Posts: 9065
Real Name: Richard Fitzwelliner
|
Guns4Liberty wrote: As H2Obouget pointed out, the message doesn't make a lot of sense. The RCW in question ( 9.41.190) explicitly prohibits the manufacture of SBRs in Section 1, but in Section 2 it says that SBRs acquired in accordance with Federal Law are not unlawful. And since manufacturing a SBR is federally acceptable, I see no reason why the BATFE (DOJ?) would find a problem with manufacturing SBRs due to the RCW. So I have to go out of state with this build? File the transfer of NFA item across state lines form?
_________________ If she sits on your face and you can still hear, SHE'S NOT FAT.
I'm going to type out 3 paragraphs and wax eloquently about a similar story in my life. Pm me if you figured it out.
|
Wed May 27, 2015 8:54 pm |
|
|
blackrifleman
Location: everett area Joined: Sat Jan 4, 2014 Posts: 185
|
What did you submit on you're form 1?
|
Wed May 27, 2015 9:00 pm |
|
|
TheVen
Location: TC Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 Posts: 37
|
Just got the same thing here at about 2144. What the hell? So others have been approved but us unlucky few who happened to be examined tonight got the selective interpretation of an agent?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
Wed May 27, 2015 9:01 pm |
|
|
|