Author |
Message |
Peckerinak
Site Supporter
Location: Yelm Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 Posts: 744
Real Name: Ted
|
I was gonna say as long a he pays his bill to advertise he can stay. Then reads he hasn’t paid in awhile.
So bye bye. Just another bitch looking for his 15 minutes of fame by doing stupid outlandish shit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:22 pm |
|
|
dav2no1
Site Supporter
Location: South Hill Puyallup Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 Posts: 252
Real Name: Dave S.
|
So since no-one posted this...from the other cool local gun board. This is what a d-bag he really is...check out 3rd paragraph http://old.seattletimes.com/html/busine ... pam02.html
_________________ Know guns, know peace and safety. No guns, no peace nor safety
|
Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:28 pm |
|
|
blue92
Location: NE Thurston County Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 Posts: 105
|
I think they should be allowed to stay on to whatever level their membership and/or payment processes allow them to be. To run them off like "get out of my sandbox" is a foolish, immature, knee-jerk reaction similar to what all those antis you all seem to despise would do. Give them a legitimate platform to speak their case---there are members here who have posted in agreement with the 21 years-of-age idea; should they be ran off as well?
|
Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:54 pm |
|
|
Sinus211
Site Moderator
Location: Marysville Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 Posts: 13503
Real Name: Mike
|
If he wants to stay and further his online business suicide let him. He's only hurting himself by further publicizing this.
_________________Licensed/Bonded/Insured Hardwood Floor Installer/Finisher http://www.hardwoodfloorsnw.com/
|
Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:59 pm |
|
|
Selador
Site Supporter
Location: Index Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 Posts: 12963
Real Name: Jeff
|
blue92 wrote: I think they should be allowed to stay on to whatever level their membership and/or payment processes allow them to be. To run them off like "get out of my sandbox" is a foolish, immature, knee-jerk reaction similar to what all those antis you all seem to despise would do. Give them a legitimate platform to speak their case---there are members here who have posted in agreement with the 21 years-of-age idea; should they be ran off as well? Agreed. As long as it remains civil.
_________________ -Jeff
How can I help you, and/or make you smile, today?
You are entitled to your opinion. You are not entitled to tell me what mine must be.
Do justice. Love mercy.
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ~ Richard P. Feynman
|
Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:05 pm |
|
|
usrifle
Site Supporter
Location: RENTON Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 Posts: 20771
Real Name: John
|
blue92 wrote: I think they should be allowed to stay on to whatever level their membership and/or payment processes allow them to be. To run them off like "get out of my sandbox" is a foolish, immature, knee-jerk reaction similar to what all those antis you all seem to despise would do. Give them a legitimate platform to speak their case---there are members here who have posted in agreement with the 21 years-of-age idea; should they be ran off as well? It would seem i have missed who agreed with the 21 YO age idea. Please link to that statement, i am curious.
_________________ Mr. Q wrote: so basically, if you have to smoke some asshole, make sure they become fertilizer and then Bounce? got it.
Guntrader wrote: Huh, maybe I was an asshole.
NRA Member/RSO SAF 5 Year Donor GOA Member
|
Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:11 pm |
|
|
dav2no1
Site Supporter
Location: South Hill Puyallup Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 Posts: 252
Real Name: Dave S.
|
Selador wrote: blue92 wrote: I think they should be allowed to stay on to whatever level their membership and/or payment processes allow them to be. To run them off like "get out of my sandbox" is a foolish, immature, knee-jerk reaction similar to what all those antis you all seem to despise would do. Give them a legitimate platform to speak their case---there are members here who have posted in agreement with the 21 years-of-age idea; should they be ran off as well? Agreed. As long as it remains civil. Read the link! He's a d-bag porn spammer as well as gun shop owner! http://old.seattletimes.com/html/busine ... pam02.html
_________________ Know guns, know peace and safety. No guns, no peace nor safety
|
Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:25 pm |
|
|
blue92
Location: NE Thurston County Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 Posts: 105
|
usrifle wrote: blue92 wrote: I think they should be allowed to stay on to whatever level their membership and/or payment processes allow them to be. To run them off like "get out of my sandbox" is a foolish, immature, knee-jerk reaction similar to what all those antis you all seem to despise would do. Give them a legitimate platform to speak their case---there are members here who have posted in agreement with the 21 years-of-age idea; should they be ran off as well? It would seem i have missed who agreed with the 21 YO age idea. Please link to that statement, i am curious. It's all in here: viewtopic.php?f=33&t=88396&hilit=low+price+gunsUnless this is more carryover of the semantics about cherrypicking the definitions of words in which case, I work much too hard to deal with that. Good day.
|
Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:28 pm |
|
|
Selador
Site Supporter
Location: Index Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 Posts: 12963
Real Name: Jeff
|
dav2no1 wrote: Selador wrote: blue92 wrote: I think they should be allowed to stay on to whatever level their membership and/or payment processes allow them to be. To run them off like "get out of my sandbox" is a foolish, immature, knee-jerk reaction similar to what all those antis you all seem to despise would do. Give them a legitimate platform to speak their case---there are members here who have posted in agreement with the 21 years-of-age idea; should they be ran off as well? Agreed. As long as it remains civil. Read the link! He's a d-bag porn spammer as well as gun shop owner! http://old.seattletimes.com/html/busine ... pam02.htmlHas he posted porn here? If not, what does that have to do with him remaining here?
_________________ -Jeff
How can I help you, and/or make you smile, today?
You are entitled to your opinion. You are not entitled to tell me what mine must be.
Do justice. Love mercy.
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ~ Richard P. Feynman
|
Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:30 pm |
|
|
Sinus211
Site Moderator
Location: Marysville Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 Posts: 13503
Real Name: Mike
|
Selador wrote: dav2no1 wrote: Selador wrote: blue92 wrote: I think they should be allowed to stay on to whatever level their membership and/or payment processes allow them to be. To run them off like "get out of my sandbox" is a foolish, immature, knee-jerk reaction similar to what all those antis you all seem to despise would do. Give them a legitimate platform to speak their case---there are members here who have posted in agreement with the 21 years-of-age idea; should they be ran off as well? Agreed. As long as it remains civil. Read the link! He's a d-bag porn spammer as well as gun shop owner! http://old.seattletimes.com/html/busine ... pam02.htmlHas he posted porn here? If not, what does that have to do with him remaining here? Dude is taking the "holier than thou" approach and he's been sued by Microsoft for spamming porn and male enhancement links. Just goes to show what kind of person Jason Cazes really is. Personally, I think it's relevant.
_________________Licensed/Bonded/Insured Hardwood Floor Installer/Finisher http://www.hardwoodfloorsnw.com/
|
Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:46 pm |
|
|
Selador
Site Supporter
Location: Index Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 Posts: 12963
Real Name: Jeff
|
sinus211 wrote: Selador wrote: Has he posted porn here? If not, what does that have to do with him remaining here? Dude is taking the "holier than thou" approach and he's been sued by Microsoft for spamming porn and male enhancement links. Just goes to show what kind of person Jason Cazes really is. Personally, I think it's relevant. Relevant? In what way? You think he's a dirt bag, so he shouldn't post here? Isn't that the very definition of "holier than thou'? I don't like him either. I just don't happen to think that he has to meet my approval, to post here. If we started kicking people out, just because we didn't like them, no one would be left. I'm sure there are plenty of people that don't like me. Should I be kicked out because of that?
_________________ -Jeff
How can I help you, and/or make you smile, today?
You are entitled to your opinion. You are not entitled to tell me what mine must be.
Do justice. Love mercy.
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ~ Richard P. Feynman
|
Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:55 pm |
|
|
Sinus211
Site Moderator
Location: Marysville Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 Posts: 13503
Real Name: Mike
|
Well Jeff if you read back you'll see that I said very specifically that he should be allowed to post here. But knowing the background of someone posting helps you to understand more about the source. Which is why I believe that his history of shady practice that he was sued for and actually made headlines is relevant.
Uncle Sam wants to know about your background before you buy a gun. That's relevant right? I want to know this guy's background before he goes spouting off trying to change constitutionally assured rights. Is his background not relevant?
_________________Licensed/Bonded/Insured Hardwood Floor Installer/Finisher http://www.hardwoodfloorsnw.com/
|
Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:04 am |
|
|
NWGunner
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu May 2, 2013 Posts: 12475
Real Name: Steve
|
Selador wrote: sinus211 wrote: Selador wrote: Has he posted porn here? If not, what does that have to do with him remaining here? Dude is taking the "holier than thou" approach and he's been sued by Microsoft for spamming porn and male enhancement links. Just goes to show what kind of person Jason Cazes really is. Personally, I think it's relevant. Relevant? In what way? You think he's a dirt bag, so he shouldn't post here? Isn't that the very definition of "holier than thou'? I don't like him either. I just don't happen to think that he has to meet my approval, to post here. If we started kicking people out, just because we didn't like them, no one would be left. I'm sure there are plenty of people that don't like me. Should I be kicked out because of that? My point about that is that he's all for the 1st Amendment because it profits him, but wants to make changes to the 2nd Amendment. He's not elected; who made him the representative of us, and who is he to decide which Constitutional Amendments get exploited, .vs which he has decided to change. So, he gets to decide which to abuse, and which to change? There's a reported rape every 6.2 minutes in the U.S., maybe we should change the Amendment that allows him to profit off is porn.... Slippery slope...
|
Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:06 am |
|
|
Selador
Site Supporter
Location: Index Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 Posts: 12963
Real Name: Jeff
|
Good points by both of you.
_________________ -Jeff
How can I help you, and/or make you smile, today?
You are entitled to your opinion. You are not entitled to tell me what mine must be.
Do justice. Love mercy.
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ~ Richard P. Feynman
|
Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:08 am |
|
|
dav2no1
Site Supporter
Location: South Hill Puyallup Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 Posts: 252
Real Name: Dave S.
|
Starting to become my favorite reply...with all this talk, I haven't seen one mention by anyone how they're going to take guns away from criminals. Only how they are going to be taken away from honest citizens.
I'm not giving up any of our rights. If we do it will be like that stupid movie..."And then...and then...and then?...No and then!"
_________________ Know guns, know peace and safety. No guns, no peace nor safety
|
Tue Feb 27, 2018 6:11 am |
|
|
|