WaGuns.org

Page 3 of 3

[ 37 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3

Poll: Should low priced guns be removed as a vendor here

Author	Message
jdhbulseye Site Supporter Location: Rochester, WA Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 Posts: 3761 Real Name: Mr. Idgaf	Re: Poll: Should low priced guns be removed as a vendor here sinus211 wrote: I want to know this guy's background before he goes spouting off trying to change constitutionally assured rights. Constitutionally Enumerated. Gigantic difference. _________________ MadPick wrote: Without penetration data, the pics aren't of much use. Spoiler: show "Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don't mean to do harm -- but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves." – T.S. Eliot "The right of self defence is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction." - St. George Tucker A careful definition of words would destroy half the agenda of the political left and scrutinizing evidence would destroy the other half. - Thomas Sowell "To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding." - Jeff Snyder Personal weapons are what raised mankind out of the mud, and the rifle is the queen of personal weapons. The possession of a good rifle, as well as the skill to use it well, truly makes a man the monarch of all he surveys. It realizes the ancient dream of the Jovian thunderbolt, and as such it is the embodiment of personal power. For this reason it exercises a curious influence over the minds of most men, and in its best examples it constitutes an object of affection unmatched by any other inanimate object. Jeff Cooper 1997 The Art of the Rifle Page 1. Spoiler: show SUGGEST CASE BE SUBMITTED ON APPELLANT'S BRIEF. UNABLE TO OBTAIN ANY MONEY FROM CLIENTS TO BE PRESENT & ARGUE BRIEF. The defense attorney's telegram to the clerk of the Supreme Court, March 29, 1939, in re United States. v. Miller. You don't need to go to Law School to understand the constitutional implications of that. “You can’t cut the throat of every cocksucker whose character it would improve.” Spoiler: show cityslicker wrote: I don't want to be told that I can't remove the tree by some tree-hugging pole smoker from the eat-a-dick foundation/Olympia/King County.
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:36 am

weimar_police Site Supporter Location: N Spokane Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2018 Posts: 29 Real Name: Edward	Re: Poll: Should low priced guns be removed as a vendor here foothills wrote: mtnwkr wrote: I need to change my vote.. You ask two very opposite questions between the thread title and the poll. I got confused. :/ Yeah...same here! Clear up the title and topic confusion. Move 1 yes in the poll to a no... Obviously an inside 'joke' as the posts here do not make sense to the Poll title - i.e. any company who sells cheaper guns should be allowed to sell. If you have a specific company, then please state that and point a thread to it, so newer members know what you really mean....
Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:17 am

PMB In Memoriam Joined: Wed Mar 6, 2013 Posts: 12018	Re: Poll: Should low priced guns be removed as a vendor here weimar_police wrote: foothills wrote: mtnwkr wrote: I need to change my vote.. You ask two very opposite questions between the thread title and the poll. I got confused. :/ Yeah...same here! Clear up the title and topic confusion. Move 1 yes in the poll to a no... Obviously an inside 'joke' as the posts here do not make sense to the Poll title - i.e. any company who sells cheaper guns should be allowed to sell. If you have a specific company, then please state that and point a thread to it, so newer members know what you really mean.... The company is Low Price Guns. There are a couple of threads that are quite active on the topic. viewtopic.php?f=125&t=88744 viewtopic.php?f=33&t=88396
Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:19 am

jukk0u Site Supporter Location: Lynnwood and at large Joined: Wed May 1, 2013 Posts: 21256 Real Name: Vick Lagina	Re: Poll: Should low priced guns be removed as a vendor here Let the free market determine whether he should sink or swim. You don't like what he had to say? speak up, too. Free discourse is good. Don't buy there if you don't like his politics. (I won't). I didn't see "tar and feathers" or "run out of town on a rail" as options in the poll.... _________________ “Finding ‘common ground’ with the thinking of evil men is a fool’s errand” ~ Herschel Smith "The ~~said~~ Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." ~ Samuel Adams “A return to First Principles in a Republic is sometimes caused by simple virtues of a single man. His good example has such an influence that the good men strive to imitate him, and the wicked are ashamed to lead a life so contrary to his example. Before all else, be armed!” ~ Niccolo Machiavelli Láodòng zhèng zhūwèi zìyóu FJB
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:41 pm

Pablo Site Supporter Location: Everson, WA Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013 Posts: 28174 Real Name: Ace Winky	Re: Poll: Should low priced guns be removed as a vendor here So anybody costume up and go shop for a deal? _________________ Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck? Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:53 pm

Sinus211 Site Moderator Location: Marysville Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 Posts: 13502 Real Name: Mike	Re: Poll: Should low priced guns be removed as a vendor here jdhbulseye wrote: sinus211 wrote: I want to know this guy's background before he goes spouting off trying to change constitutionally assured rights. Constitutionally Enumerated. Gigantic difference. https://www.google.com/search?q=enumera ... irefox-b-1 Yeah, no. The constitution did not establish my right to bear arms, people had the right long before the constitution existed. The constitution as a document simply assures in writing that I have a legal/natural right in this country. But I agree, there is a gigantic difference between a god given right and one that was "established" by a government. In which case enumerated is very much the wrong word to describe our right to bear arms. If you want to play vocabulary nazi make sure you have your dicktionary in your hand... _________________ Licensed/Bonded/Insured Hardwood Floor Installer/Finisher http://www.hardwoodfloorsnw.com/
Tue Feb 27, 2018 8:21 pm

jdhbulseye Site Supporter Location: Rochester, WA Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 Posts: 3761 Real Name: Mr. Idgaf	Re: Poll: Should low priced guns be removed as a vendor here sinus211 wrote: jdhbulseye wrote: sinus211 wrote: I want to know this guy's background before he goes spouting off trying to change constitutionally assured rights. Constitutionally Enumerated. Gigantic difference. https://www.google.com/search?q=enumera ... irefox-b-1 Yeah, no. The constitution did not establish my right to bear arms, people had the right long before the constitution existed. The constitution as a document simply assures in writing that I have a legal/natural right in this country. But I agree, there is a gigantic difference between a god given right and one that was "established" by a government. In which case enumerated is very much the wrong word to describe our right to bear arms. If you want to play vocabulary nazi make sure you have your dicktionary in your hand... No need to get smarmy. I never tried to argue that the constitution granted or established those rights. You and I are arguing the same point and debating semantics now, which is retarded. One of the definitions of Enumerate is "list" which is exactly what the BoR did. If you want to argue about that maybe you can *explain why the writers of the BoR chose that exact word for the 9th amendment.* I won't insult your intelligence by providing a google link. Like you say it didn't grant fuck all, the rights enumerated therein existed before the Constitution and the BoR. Both the word assure and the word enumerate are apt descriptors of what the BoR did. Which means we are both wrong and we are both right. Lets argue about something substantive. _________________ MadPick wrote: Without penetration data, the pics aren't of much use. Spoiler: show "Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don't mean to do harm -- but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves." – T.S. Eliot "The right of self defence is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction." - St. George Tucker A careful definition of words would destroy half the agenda of the political left and scrutinizing evidence would destroy the other half. - Thomas Sowell "To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding." - Jeff Snyder Personal weapons are what raised mankind out of the mud, and the rifle is the queen of personal weapons. The possession of a good rifle, as well as the skill to use it well, truly makes a man the monarch of all he surveys. It realizes the ancient dream of the Jovian thunderbolt, and as such it is the embodiment of personal power. For this reason it exercises a curious influence over the minds of most men, and in its best examples it constitutes an object of affection unmatched by any other inanimate object. Jeff Cooper 1997 The Art of the Rifle Page 1. Spoiler: show SUGGEST CASE BE SUBMITTED ON APPELLANT'S BRIEF. UNABLE TO OBTAIN ANY MONEY FROM CLIENTS TO BE PRESENT & ARGUE BRIEF. The defense attorney's telegram to the clerk of the Supreme Court, March 29, 1939, in re United States. v. Miller. You don't need to go to Law School to understand the constitutional implications of that. “You can’t cut the throat of every cocksucker whose character it would improve.” Spoiler: show cityslicker wrote: I don't want to be told that I can't remove the tree by some tree-hugging pole smoker from the eat-a-dick foundation/Olympia/King County.
Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:08 am

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Page 3 of 3

[ 37 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3

Poll: Should low priced guns be removed as a vendor here

Who is online