Author |
Message |
usrifle
Site Supporter
Location: RENTON Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 Posts: 20771
Real Name: John
|
_________________ Mr. Q wrote: so basically, if you have to smoke some asshole, make sure they become fertilizer and then Bounce? got it.
Guntrader wrote: Huh, maybe I was an asshole.
NRA Member/RSO SAF 5 Year Donor GOA Member
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 12:28 am |
|
|
vic_b
Site Supporter
Location: Maple valley Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 Posts: 3528
|
Afraid to offend their peers? What doesn't offend them?!
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:46 am |
|
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
Holy shit Komo is carrying stories from Campus Reform? Wow hell has frozen over!
I guess Sinclair really is making changes...
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 6:47 am |
|
|
Pablo
Site Supporter
Location: Everson, WA Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013 Posts: 28177
Real Name: Ace Winky
|
Alpine wrote: Holy shit Komo is carrying stories from Campus Reform? Wow hell has frozen over!
I guess Sinclair really is making changes... KOMO will pull it......5...4.....3.........3...........2..............2........1
_________________ Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck?
Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 6:55 am |
|
|
jorgeu
Site Supporter
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 Posts: 631
|
The whole thing just made my day. So, if we make Trump become an all out anti-gunner we will get democrats to oppose any gun legislation? because they seems to just oppose anything Trump says no matter if they had the same agenda in the past.
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:30 am |
|
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
This proves TDS is a real disease.
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:43 am |
|
|
SporkBoy
Site Supporter
Location: Deckerville Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 Posts: 2944
Real Name: Rob
|
College students are a pretty low bar.
_________________ “The Democrats are playing you for a political chump and if you vote for them, not only are you a chump, you are a traitor to your race.”-Malcolm X
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:01 am |
|
|
PMB
In Memoriam
Joined: Wed Mar 6, 2013 Posts: 12018
|
To be fair, a very similar thing happens in a reversed situation. People on both sides of the issues are ... uhm, less than perfect in forming rational arguments.
The real loss is that even after their knee jerk reaction is exposed, many folks will continue to simply be opposed to every thing POTUS does or says... on principle. They're following the puppetmaster Pelosi. Just like many of the Rs did when the previous POTUS was in office.
We're a deeply divided nation, and both sides have their blinders on to a certain degree.
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:12 am |
|
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
PMB wrote: To be fair, a very similar thing happens in a reversed situation. People on both sides of the issues are ... uhm, less than perfect in forming rational arguments.
The real loss is that even after their knee jerk reaction is exposed, many folks will continue to simply be opposed to every thing POTUS does or says... on principle. They're following the puppetmaster Pelosi. Just like many of the Rs did when the previous POTUS was in office.
We're a deeply divided nation, and both sides have their blinders on to a certain degree. I could see that with anti gun comments from RINOs and former RINOs that you might be able to trick people into saying are awful but I have a feeling that liberty minded folks would equally condemn it no matter where it comes from. There's also the matter that one side wants us literally to be murdered...
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:50 am |
|
|
PMB
In Memoriam
Joined: Wed Mar 6, 2013 Posts: 12018
|
Alpine wrote: PMB wrote: To be fair, a very similar thing happens in a reversed situation. People on both sides of the issues are ... uhm, less than perfect in forming rational arguments.
The real loss is that even after their knee jerk reaction is exposed, many folks will continue to simply be opposed to every thing POTUS does or says... on principle. They're following the puppetmaster Pelosi. Just like many of the Rs did when the previous POTUS was in office.
We're a deeply divided nation, and both sides have their blinders on to a certain degree. I could see that with anti gun comments from RINOs and former RINOs that you might be able to trick people into saying are awful but I have a feeling that liberty minded folks would equally condemn it no matter where it comes from. I agree in principle. That doesn't negate the fact that there are plenty on both sides who kneejerk instead of think. That was my point. Alpine wrote: There's also the matter that one side wants us literally to be murdered... It is a very small minority who say this... like tiny. Go into a "conservative" site with comment section and read the very tiny amount of "conservatives" who openly advocate for murdering liberals. It's a thing.
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 11:01 am |
|
|
Pablo
Site Supporter
Location: Everson, WA Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013 Posts: 28177
Real Name: Ace Winky
|
SporkBoy wrote: College students are a pretty low bar. That's near signature material.
_________________ Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck?
Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 11:29 am |
|
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
PMB wrote: Alpine wrote: PMB wrote: To be fair, a very similar thing happens in a reversed situation. People on both sides of the issues are ... uhm, less than perfect in forming rational arguments.
The real loss is that even after their knee jerk reaction is exposed, many folks will continue to simply be opposed to every thing POTUS does or says... on principle. They're following the puppetmaster Pelosi. Just like many of the Rs did when the previous POTUS was in office.
We're a deeply divided nation, and both sides have their blinders on to a certain degree. I could see that with anti gun comments from RINOs and former RINOs that you might be able to trick people into saying are awful but I have a feeling that liberty minded folks would equally condemn it no matter where it comes from. I agree in principle. That doesn't negate the fact that there are plenty on both sides who kneejerk instead of think. That was my point. Alpine wrote: There's also the matter that one side wants us literally to be murdered... It is a very small minority who say this... like tiny. Go into a "conservative" site with comment section and read the very tiny amount of "conservatives" who openly advocate for murdering liberals. It's a thing. It's not tiny, it's the main body of democrats. They want possession bans and due-process-less ERPOs served with 2am no-knocks that have killed and will continue to kill gun owners. Check my signature.
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 11:49 am |
|
|
PMB
In Memoriam
Joined: Wed Mar 6, 2013 Posts: 12018
|
Alpine wrote: PMB wrote: Alpine wrote: PMB wrote: To be fair, a very similar thing happens in a reversed situation. People on both sides of the issues are ... uhm, less than perfect in forming rational arguments.
The real loss is that even after their knee jerk reaction is exposed, many folks will continue to simply be opposed to every thing POTUS does or says... on principle. They're following the puppetmaster Pelosi. Just like many of the Rs did when the previous POTUS was in office.
We're a deeply divided nation, and both sides have their blinders on to a certain degree. I could see that with anti gun comments from RINOs and former RINOs that you might be able to trick people into saying are awful but I have a feeling that liberty minded folks would equally condemn it no matter where it comes from. I agree in principle. That doesn't negate the fact that there are plenty on both sides who kneejerk instead of think. That was my point. Alpine wrote: There's also the matter that one side wants us literally to be murdered... It is a very small minority who say this... like tiny. Go into a "conservative" site with comment section and read the very tiny amount of "conservatives" who openly advocate for murdering liberals. It's a thing. It's not tiny, it's the main body of democrats. They want possession bans and due-process-less ERPOs served with 2am no-knocks that have killed and will continue to kill gun owners. Check my signature. I disagree. It is the tiniest portion that actually want gun owners killed. Exaggerating the outrageousness of an ideological foe is a strawman argument. Not every (or even main body) D or every anti-2A person wants gun owners killed in no-knock raids. It weakens your position to contend so.
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 11:56 am |
|
|
Selador
Site Supporter
Location: Index Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 Posts: 12963
Real Name: Jeff
|
PMB wrote: Alpine wrote: PMB wrote: Alpine wrote: PMB wrote: To be fair, a very similar thing happens in a reversed situation. People on both sides of the issues are ... uhm, less than perfect in forming rational arguments.
The real loss is that even after their knee jerk reaction is exposed, many folks will continue to simply be opposed to every thing POTUS does or says... on principle. They're following the puppetmaster Pelosi. Just like many of the Rs did when the previous POTUS was in office.
We're a deeply divided nation, and both sides have their blinders on to a certain degree. I could see that with anti gun comments from RINOs and former RINOs that you might be able to trick people into saying are awful but I have a feeling that liberty minded folks would equally condemn it no matter where it comes from. I agree in principle. That doesn't negate the fact that there are plenty on both sides who kneejerk instead of think. That was my point. Alpine wrote: There's also the matter that one side wants us literally to be murdered... It is a very small minority who say this... like tiny. Go into a "conservative" site with comment section and read the very tiny amount of "conservatives" who openly advocate for murdering liberals. It's a thing. It's not tiny, it's the main body of democrats. They want possession bans and due-process-less ERPOs served with 2am no-knocks that have killed and will continue to kill gun owners. Check my signature. I disagree. It is the tiniest portion that actually want gun owners killed. Exaggerating the outrageousness of an ideological foe is a strawman argument. Not every (or even main body) D or every anti-2A person wants gun owners killed in no-knock raids. It weakens your position to contend so. I think the argument is... They want guns taken away from us. The way guns are usually taken, is at gunpoint, and often results in our death. Even if we do not resist. Ergo, they want us dead. One does not always lead to the other. Nor does one equate to the other. But the argument can be made...
_________________ -Jeff
How can I help you, and/or make you smile, today?
You are entitled to your opinion. You are not entitled to tell me what mine must be.
Do justice. Love mercy.
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ~ Richard P. Feynman
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:16 pm |
|
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
PMB wrote: Alpine wrote: PMB wrote: Alpine wrote: PMB wrote: To be fair, a very similar thing happens in a reversed situation. People on both sides of the issues are ... uhm, less than perfect in forming rational arguments.
The real loss is that even after their knee jerk reaction is exposed, many folks will continue to simply be opposed to every thing POTUS does or says... on principle. They're following the puppetmaster Pelosi. Just like many of the Rs did when the previous POTUS was in office.
We're a deeply divided nation, and both sides have their blinders on to a certain degree. I could see that with anti gun comments from RINOs and former RINOs that you might be able to trick people into saying are awful but I have a feeling that liberty minded folks would equally condemn it no matter where it comes from. I agree in principle. That doesn't negate the fact that there are plenty on both sides who kneejerk instead of think. That was my point. Alpine wrote: There's also the matter that one side wants us literally to be murdered... It is a very small minority who say this... like tiny. Go into a "conservative" site with comment section and read the very tiny amount of "conservatives" who openly advocate for murdering liberals. It's a thing. It's not tiny, it's the main body of democrats. They want possession bans and due-process-less ERPOs served with 2am no-knocks that have killed and will continue to kill gun owners. Check my signature. I disagree. It is the tiniest portion that actually want gun owners killed. Exaggerating the outrageousness of an ideological foe is a strawman argument. Not every (or even main body) D or every anti-2A person wants gun owners killed in no-knock raids. It weakens your position to contend so. What I'm trying to say is, they vote for it=they want it. They vote to kill us, they want to kill us. How many semi auto pistols do you own that are on the state pistol registry?
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:23 pm |
|
|
|