Gun store Shooting Locations It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:01 am



Rules WGO Chat Room Gear Rent Me Shield NRA SAF CCKRBA
Calendar




Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 NO on 90! 
Author Message
User avatar

Location: Edmonds, WA
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015
Posts: 422
As a mom of littles, I 100% agree with you on voting no. I've done some digging into the curriculum that would be approved and it's not in any way, shape or form age-appropriate. This is what I said about it on my facebook:

As a parent of a seven-year-old daughter, I can tell you right now that I don't think she needs to be learning about a "very sensitive little area called the clitoris". She doesn't need to become confused by learning that "some girls have penises" and other beliefs of the doctrine of transgenderism. My ten-year-old son does not need to see graphic cartoon representations of sex and masturbation or how to become a "sex ed sleuth" by going on websites to learn about 69 and blue balls. They're kids.
The biggest red flag in all of this, in my opinion, is the fact that there is no easy way for the parents of Washington state to see exactly what their children will be learning and at what ages. It is my sincere belief that there would be an uproar if that were the case. There is already a fairly great uproar. The signatures collected to overturn this bill broke Washington state records.
I encourage you to vote to REJECT Referendum 90 this fall; at the very least, until there is more transparency for the parents of this state.


Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:37 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Spanaway WA
Joined: Wed Jul 6, 2011
Posts: 6313
Real Name: Hugo Stiglitz
This whole initiative is fucking sick to say the least.....Any idiot who votes in favor of it need to have their fucking head examined.....

I grew up in Oregon and sex ed did NOT start until the 7th Grade and even then you HAD to have your parents sign a pretty long form as I remember it, it wasnt like a field-day form or student excuse form.

Teaching little ones about this stuff at an early age is gonna create some pretty fucking sick monsters in the future.


Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:46 pm
Profile
Online
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: In my Cave near the Cloquallum
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013
Posts: 7807
Real Name: Jim Sr.
As stated before this is nothing but an indoctrination of children, your children, the absurdity of the liberal party. Plain and simple a shit storm that will cost taxpayers millions of dollars when a Fruitloop teacher goes all touchy-feely.

VOTE NO on this garbage!!!

_________________
"You are either with us...as Americans. Or, You are against us. There is no IN BETWEEN." ???

"We cannot negotiate with those who say, 'What's mine is mine, and what's yours is negotiable.'" JFK

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”

-Ben Franklin

MadPick wrote:
I don't think you beat your children enough. :ROFLMAO:


Last edited by Caveman Jim on Wed Oct 21, 2020 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:03 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar
Site Admin

Location: Renton, WA
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011
Posts: 52064
Real Name: Steve
Annalee wrote:
As a mom of littles, I 100% agree with you on voting no. I've done some digging into the curriculum that would be approved and it's not in any way, shape or form age-appropriate. This is what I said about it on my facebook:

As a parent of a seven-year-old daughter, I can tell you right now that I don't think she needs to be learning about a "very sensitive little area called the clitoris". She doesn't need to become confused by learning that "some girls have penises" and other beliefs of the doctrine of transgenderism. My ten-year-old son does not need to see graphic cartoon representations of sex and masturbation or how to become a "sex ed sleuth" by going on websites to learn about 69 and blue balls. They're kids.
The biggest red flag in all of this, in my opinion, is the fact that there is no easy way for the parents of Washington state to see exactly what their children will be learning and at what ages. It is my sincere belief that there would be an uproar if that were the case. There is already a fairly great uproar. The signatures collected to overturn this bill broke Washington state records.
I encourage you to vote to REJECT Referendum 90 this fall; at the very least, until there is more transparency for the parents of this state.


Heeeyyyy, look who's back! :wavey:

_________________
Steve

Benefactor Life Member, National Rifle Association
Life Member, Second Amendment Foundation
Patriot & Life Member, Gun Owners of America
Life Member, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
Legal Action Supporter, Firearms Policy Coalition
Member, NAGR/NFGR

Please support the organizations that support all of us.

Leave it cleaner than you found it.


Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:21 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Everson, WA
Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013
Posts: 28187
Real Name: Ace Winky
bubblewhip wrote:
derrickito wrote:
i voted yes. i believe the school system can develop and teach age appropriate material to educate youth on sex and sexual health topics. i don't see this as an inappropriate or difficult task. we teach kids in schools about civics, science, health, and an array of other topics. sex ed should be in there. an educated population will hopefully make educated decisions.

the full ballot and information including arguments for and against is here: https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_Refe ... sure_(2020)


What is actually in the curriculum? what are the handouts or course materials being provided to teachers and kids? I don't see any information on what is actually being taught other than a general overview?


Fair question. Scroll and see Annalee's response.

Check this: https://mynorthwest.com/2193921/a-visua ... e-to-hide/

It's pretty extreme. Kids at that young age don't need to pushed to decide what gender they prefer. If they are gay, ok it will come out later, 12-13-14+ and we should be accepting. But 5 or 6? No way.

_________________
Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck?

Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.


Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:58 pm
Profile
User avatar

Location: Snohomish
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019
Posts: 361
Teaching INNOCENT children sex ed at that age is child abuse. Plain and simple. If a parent of young kids thinks that introduction to adulthood at that age is necessary, then they might just be lousy parents. Or pedos. Kids deserve to be kids. Any teacher willing to teach adult behavior to innocent children(single digit age?) shouldnt be trusted with the children.
Diversity (new science?) and sex arent the same thing. Or even associated.Unless were talking skanky? But its good for confusion and the destruction of values in our little ones i guess? Cant see the benefit here yet...
And what does bullying have to do with sex ed at the elementary level? Why not teach them self respect instead? Or to be competitive? Or math? State testing results are a very good guage for a progress report on the teachers performance. And its not looking good at the moment for them. But they keep getting paid more and teach less and less vital behavior. And knowledge is power. So its like theyre trying to disadvantage them? And their futures. Its perversion.
Remember they cast out God from school long ago. Now the Pledge of Allegiance is offensive too? Racist even? But satanists are welcome to do their evil prayers at the capital building lobby? The state education(or deliberate lack thereof) board needs to be put in check. Its just disgusting anymore with those people and their ideology. Dogma


Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:45 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Bonney Lake
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011
Posts: 3294
Pablo wrote:

Check this: https://mynorthwest.com/2193921/a-visua ... e-to-hide/

It's pretty extreme. Kids at that young age don't need to pushed to decide what gender they prefer. If they are gay, ok it will come out later, 12-13-14+ and we should be accepting. But 5 or 6? No way.


this is fucking insane.


Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:24 pm
Profile
User avatar

Location: Sagamihara, Kanagawa
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012
Posts: 960
derrickito wrote:
i voted yes. i believe the school system can develop and teach age appropriate material to educate youth on sex and sexual health topics. i don't see this as an inappropriate or difficult task. we teach kids in schools about civics, science, health, and an array of other topics. sex ed should be in there. an educated population will hopefully make educated decisions.

the full ballot and information including arguments for and against is here: https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_Refe ... sure_(2020)


Of course you did, having to see all your other comments it isn't surprising.

To everyone else, I know this is a public forum but WTF? I come here to get away from people like this.. take that shit to REDDIT with the other brainwashed bootlickers.

_________________
You can't comply your way out of tyranny.


Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:25 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013
Posts: 303
You're right. You caught me. I'm really just a satanic commie who wants to turn all your kids gay. My bad!

It's the adrenochrome.


Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:43 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Not Seattle
Joined: Wed Nov 2, 2016
Posts: 698
Are we all just coming here for an echo chamber of agreement with our opinions? Or are we here to discuss stuff? I’m here for the latter. This is a discussion board, after all.

_________________
Cognitive dissonance kills


Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:48 pm
Profile
User avatar

Location: Sagamihara, Kanagawa
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012
Posts: 960
derrickito wrote:
You're right. You caught me. I'm really just a satanic commie who wants to turn all your kids gay. My bad!

It's the adrenochrome.



Personally I don't have a problem with gay people, you using it as a derogatory way shows that you might.

_________________
You can't comply your way out of tyranny.


Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:52 pm
Profile
Online
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Nova Laboratories
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011
Posts: 18470
Real Name: Johnny 5
reginald_burrito wrote:
Are we all just coming here for an echo chamber of agreement with our opinions? Or are we here to discuss stuff? I’m here for the latter. This is a discussion board, after all.


Good luck getting any answers.

_________________
NO DISASSEMBLE!


Thomas Paine wrote:
"He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."


Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:31 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Burien
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 5882
I am very heartened by all of your answers, I thought I was one of the few that never supported this.

I am a Gen Xer who had to go thru all the social programming in the 70s to include tv, radio, schooling and the like (even the Army later). I turned out very liberal despite my parents being in the John Birch Society.

My path out of the brainwashing was a junkie who pointed a handgun at me in the early morning while I was running in E. LA. From there on, I remembered what the previous generations said, and I started to change my understanding of the world.

Part of people's reactions on this board I assume are like mine, we continually hear liberal programming at work and MSM and I myself am lectured by people with less life experience than I on how much of a racist, sexist, "homophobe" (if that's a word) etc. I am. I take this in stride, but retreat to WaGuns as my "safe space" to get with others who are like minded.

Yeah, I imagine this board is big enough for other ideas but understand where many of us are coming from.

Some of us don't think that Drag Queen Story time is good and we especially don't want our precious tax dollars supporting this. We want our money spent like it was our own and would prefer if it went towards English, science and math. We are especially chagrined where traditional civic activities like remembering the Revolution or our heritage are shunned.


Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:52 am
Profile
User avatar

Location: Edmonds, WA
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015
Posts: 422
MadPick wrote:
Annalee wrote:
As a mom of littles, I 100% agree with you on voting no. I've done some digging into the curriculum that would be approved and it's not in any way, shape or form age-appropriate. This is what I said about it on my facebook:

As a parent of a seven-year-old daughter, I can tell you right now that I don't think she needs to be learning about a "very sensitive little area called the clitoris". She doesn't need to become confused by learning that "some girls have penises" and other beliefs of the doctrine of transgenderism. My ten-year-old son does not need to see graphic cartoon representations of sex and masturbation or how to become a "sex ed sleuth" by going on websites to learn about 69 and blue balls. They're kids.
The biggest red flag in all of this, in my opinion, is the fact that there is no easy way for the parents of Washington state to see exactly what their children will be learning and at what ages. It is my sincere belief that there would be an uproar if that were the case. There is already a fairly great uproar. The signatures collected to overturn this bill broke Washington state records.
I encourage you to vote to REJECT Referendum 90 this fall; at the very least, until there is more transparency for the parents of this state.


Heeeyyyy, look who's back! :wavey:


Haha, yeah, I lurk from time to time. I'm north of Spokane now, livin' the dream, lol


Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:49 am
Profile
User avatar

Location: Camano Island
Joined: Thu Sep 6, 2012
Posts: 90
I voted no.

I didn't think the curriculum was bad, I think teaching young children about consent and inappropriate touching is important. It had an opt out clause.

I didn't agree with the vitriol about choosing your own gender and that nonsense.

But mainly I voted no because Washington public education is trash, and even with good intentions they will screw this up.

If the State of Washingtons Government gets involved, you know its going to be a bad time.

_________________
Patiently awaiting the Zombie Apacolypse


Wed Oct 21, 2020 12:32 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Caveman Jim, foggood11, JohnMBrowning, TechnoWeenie and 66 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum



Rules WGO Chat Room Gear Rent Me NRA SAF CCKRBA
Calendar


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.
[ Time : 0.551s | 17 Queries | GZIP : Off ]