Gun store Shooting Locations It is currently Thu Feb 06, 2025 4:34 pm



Rules WGO Chat Room Gear Rent Me NRA SAF CCKRBA
Calendar




Reply to topic  [ 29342 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688, 1689, 1690, 1691 ... 1957  Next
 What has pissed you off today? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar
Site Admin

Location: Renton, WA
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011
Posts: 53102
Real Name: Steve
JohnMBrowning wrote:
Pablo wrote:
Creek on south side of property burst the bank. Shit.


Total FAIL without pics.... :peep:


Dude, that's a bit harsh considering what Pablo is probably going through right now.

And also:

:plusone:

_________________
Steve

Benefactor Life Member, National Rifle Association
Life Member, Second Amendment Foundation
Patriot & Life Member, Gun Owners of America
Life Member, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
Legal Action Supporter, Firearms Policy Coalition
Member, NAGR/NFGR

Please support the organizations that support all of us.

Leave it cleaner than you found it.


Sun Nov 14, 2021 4:39 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Everson, WA
Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013
Posts: 28460
Real Name: Ace Winky
JohnMBrowning wrote:
Pablo wrote:
Creek on south side of property burst the bank. Shit.


Total FAIL without pics.... :peep:


Shit man, I wasn't carrying my phone. Had shovel in hand. OK so far but below I think road in is flooded. I could see down to the corner and it was covered.........this creek has no name, seasonal. Water just pouring off the Sumas mountain and hills.......soil is saturated,


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck?

Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.


Sun Nov 14, 2021 4:49 pm
Profile
In Memoriam
User avatar
In Memoriam

Location: Tacoma Wa
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Posts: 16607
Real Name: George Bailey
...

Dems looking to shut down another pipeline...

https://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats- ... 1636749884

_________________
"Remove one freedom per generation and soon you will have no freedom and no one would have noticed."......Carl Marx

"Let us Cross the river and sit in the shade of the trees" .....Stonewall Jackson

T. Jefferson "....the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. it is it's natural manure"


Mon Nov 15, 2021 7:52 am
Profile
Online
User avatar

Location: Bothell
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015
Posts: 5565
Pablo wrote:
JohnMBrowning wrote:
Pablo wrote:
Creek on south side of property burst the bank. Shit.


Total FAIL without pics.... :peep:


Shit man, I wasn't carrying my phone. Had shovel in hand. OK so far but below I think road in is flooded. I could see down to the corner and it was covered.........this creek has no name, seasonal. Water just pouring off the Sumas mountain and hills.......soil is saturated,


Sheeeesh.... you'd think a guy that lived in Duval would be used to a little bit of flooding..... :peep:

_________________
Plan B is actually repeating Plan A.... it just involves much more alcohol.

Of the ten voices I hear in my head, only three keep telling me NOT to shoot....
Do I go with the majority or common sense?


Mon Nov 15, 2021 9:01 am
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Everson, WA
Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013
Posts: 28460
Real Name: Ace Winky
JohnMBrowning wrote:
Pablo wrote:
JohnMBrowning wrote:
Pablo wrote:
Creek on south side of property burst the bank. Shit.


Total FAIL without pics.... :peep:


Shit man, I wasn't carrying my phone. Had shovel in hand. OK so far but below I think road in is flooded. I could see down to the corner and it was covered.........this creek has no name, seasonal. Water just pouring off the Sumas mountain and hills.......soil is saturated,


Sheeeesh.... you'd think a guy that lived in Duvall would be used to a little bit of flooding..... :peep:


"Historic flooding". "Never seen these roads closed before". Etc. We thought no way to get stranded here............NEVER think or say that........hahahahahahaha.........stuck. Our house and property are fine. This from standing on our closed road, looking up at our property way way to the left, way back in the trees. The seasonal creeks channel is on the RIGHT side of those brambles to the right. This overflow is on our neighbor's property.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck?

Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.


Mon Nov 15, 2021 9:07 am
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Downtown Newcastle
Joined: Sat Mar 5, 2016
Posts: 3485
Real Name: Traut
Waterfront property!

_________________
I always thought growing old would take a lot longer.....

So, when does that "Old enough to know better" shit kick in???
I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing everyone off is a piece of cake.


Mon Nov 15, 2021 9:28 am
Profile
Online
User avatar

Location: Bothell
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015
Posts: 5565
You know I'm just funnin with yoos....
Yeah - flat land along a babbling creek is always suspect in this area...
Curious -- were there no indications of flood issues when you were looking at the property? Can't imagine that this is the first/only time this has happened....

I've always been amazed at the levels of flooding that happen in the area --- used to live in DT Redmond and watch the slough all the way up to Canyon Park --- impressive when it jumps the banks 10+ feet high.... I was told when I was looking for my house to always be wary of creeks and streams near a property....

_________________
Plan B is actually repeating Plan A.... it just involves much more alcohol.

Of the ten voices I hear in my head, only three keep telling me NOT to shoot....
Do I go with the majority or common sense?


Mon Nov 15, 2021 10:11 am
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Everson, WA
Joined: Sun Jan 6, 2013
Posts: 28460
Real Name: Ace Winky
JohnMBrowning wrote:
You know I'm just funnin with yoos....
Yeah - flat land along a babbling creek is always suspect in this area...
Curious -- were there no indications of flood issues when you were looking at the property? Can't imagine that this is the first/only time this has happened....

I've always been amazed at the levels of flooding that happen in the area --- used to live in DT Redmond and watch the slough all the way up to Canyon Park --- impressive when it jumps the banks 10+ feet high.... I was told when I was looking for my house to always be wary of creeks and streams near a property....


Can't know the exact history of all seasonal cricks, but that stream is on the neighbor's property and we are upslope on Sumas mtn (not to be confused with the town of Sumas which is actually constructed IN a lake) - the picture is a bit misleading as there is a decent slope already. And that sucker was bone dry all summer - hahahahaha. We lived on Fishtrap Creek in Lynden for 5+ years so sweating BB's became the norm........I mean that sucker was like 20 feet from the back of my shop. Never again. It was cool in many ways.......except the flood risk of course. This property now would require something altogether different to flood.

The only surprise to us here is that all these creeks actually flow into the Sumas River, not the Nutsack. Sumas is currently inundated

_________________
Why does the Penguin in Batman sound like a duck?

Because the eagle sounds like a hawk.


Mon Nov 15, 2021 10:37 am
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: In my Cave near the Cloquallum
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013
Posts: 8512
Real Name: Jim Sr.
cmica wrote:
In Washington State, a new law passed this year prevents officers from chasing a car just because it’s stolen. Vehicle pursuits are now reserved only for crimes that pose a public safety risk. If a cop tries to pull someone in a stolen car over and the driver doesn’t stop, the cop has to let him go.



https://www.q13fox.com/news/pcsd-pierce ... cars-rises



pretty sure a bunch of fucking (democraps) Progressive/socialist/communist passed this


These MF’rs have taken over and are hiding under the Democrat flag. I am not advocating to saying that Democrats are good but there’s a big difference. Real Democrat voters are hoodwinked once again.

_________________
"You are either with us...as Americans. Or, You are against us. There is no IN BETWEEN." ???

"We cannot negotiate with those who say, 'What's mine is mine, and what's yours is negotiable.'" JFK

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”

-Ben Franklin

MadPick wrote:
I don't think you beat your children enough. :ROFLMAO:


Mon Nov 15, 2021 12:23 pm
Profile
Site Supporter / FFL Dealer
User avatar
Site Supporter / FFL Dealer

Location: Tacoma, Washington
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2014
Posts: 8613
Caveman Jim wrote:
cmica wrote:
In Washington State, a new law passed this year prevents officers from chasing a car just because it’s stolen. Vehicle pursuits are now reserved only for crimes that pose a public safety risk. If a cop tries to pull someone in a stolen car over and the driver doesn’t stop, the cop has to let him go.



https://www.q13fox.com/news/pcsd-pierce ... cars-rises



pretty sure a bunch of fucking (democraps) Progressive/socialist/communist passed this


These MF’rs have taken over and are hiding under the Democrat flag. I am not advocating to saying that Democrats are good but there’s a big difference. Real Democrat voters are hoodwinked once again.
The thing is, the content of that link is not true.

Being in possession of a stolen vehicle is a felony. Police can pursue someone committing a felony.

https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9a.56.068

Here’s the WSP policy about vehicle pursuits.

https://www.waspc.org/assets/Profession ... ursuit.pdf


BLACK HAMMER ARMS
Type 07 Class 2 NFA Dealer
http://www.blackhammerarms.com
http://www.facebook.com/blackhammerarms
https://www.instagram.com/blackhammerarms
GLOCK Certified Armourer

_________________
BLACK HAMMER ARMS
Buy A Suppressor http://www.silencershop.com/blackhammerarms
Type 7 Class 2 SOT NFA Dealer
1911 Pistolsmithing
Firearm Refinishing
GLOCK Certified Armorer
CMMG Authorized Dealer
NEMO Arms Authorized Dealer
http://www.blackhammerarms.com
http://www.facebook.com/blackhammerarms
https://www.instagram.com/blackhammerarms/


Mon Nov 15, 2021 12:40 pm
Profile WWW
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Nova Laboratories
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011
Posts: 19173
Real Name: Johnny 5
dreadi wrote:
Caveman Jim wrote:
cmica wrote:
In Washington State, a new law passed this year prevents officers from chasing a car just because it’s stolen. Vehicle pursuits are now reserved only for crimes that pose a public safety risk. If a cop tries to pull someone in a stolen car over and the driver doesn’t stop, the cop has to let him go.



https://www.q13fox.com/news/pcsd-pierce ... cars-rises



pretty sure a bunch of fucking (democraps) Progressive/socialist/communist passed this


These MF’rs have taken over and are hiding under the Democrat flag. I am not advocating to saying that Democrats are good but there’s a big difference. Real Democrat voters are hoodwinked once again.
The thing is, the content of that link is not true.

Being in possession of a stolen vehicle is a felony. Police can pursue someone committing a felony.

https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9a.56.068

Here’s the WSP policy about vehicle pursuits.

https://www.waspc.org/assets/Profession ... ursuit.pdf


BLACK HAMMER ARMS
Type 07 Class 2 NFA Dealer
http://www.blackhammerarms.com
http://www.facebook.com/blackhammerarms
https://www.instagram.com/blackhammerarms
GLOCK Certified Armourer



The law doesn't say 'felony', it says violent crime, then lists a couple examples.. It also says that the outcome of catching the person has to outweigh any risk, which is vague as all hell, and since anyone fleeing can cause an accident at any time, it's 'too risky'...

Quote:
RCW 10.116.060
Vehicular pursuit.
(1) A peace officer may not engage in a vehicular pursuit, unless:
(a)(i) There is probable cause to believe that a person in the vehicle has committed or is committing a violent offense or sex offense as defined in RCW 9.94A.030, or an escape under chapter 9A.76 RCW; or
(ii) There is reasonable suspicion a person in the vehicle has committed or is committing a driving under the influence offense under RCW 46.61.502;
(b) The pursuit is necessary for the purpose of identifying or apprehending the person;
(c) The person poses an imminent threat to the safety of others and the safety risks of failing to apprehend or identify the person are considered to be greater than the safety risks of the vehicular pursuit under the circumstances; and
(d)(i) Except as provided in (d)(ii) of this subsection, the officer has received authorization to engage in the pursuit from a supervising officer and there is supervisory control of the pursuit. The officer in consultation with the supervising officer must consider alternatives to the vehicular pursuit. The supervisor must consider the justification for the vehicular pursuit and other safety considerations, including but not limited to speed, weather, traffic, road conditions, and the known presence of minors in the vehicle, and the vehicular pursuit must be terminated if any of the requirements of this subsection are not met;
(ii) For those jurisdictions with fewer than 10 commissioned officers, if a supervisor is not on duty at the time, the officer will request the on-call supervisor be notified of the pursuit according to the agency's procedures. The officer must consider alternatives to the vehicular pursuit, the justification for the vehicular pursuit, and other safety considerations, including but not limited to speed, weather, traffic, road conditions, and the known presence of minors in the vehicle. The officer must terminate the vehicular pursuit if any of the requirements of this subsection are not met.
(2) A pursuing officer shall comply with any agency procedures for designating the primary pursuit vehicle and determining the appropriate number of vehicles permitted to participate in the vehicular pursuit and comply with any agency procedures for coordinating operations with other jurisdictions, including available tribal police departments when applicable.
(3) A peace officer may not fire a weapon upon a moving vehicle unless necessary to protect against an imminent threat of serious physical harm resulting from the operator's or a passenger's use of a deadly weapon. For the purposes of this subsection, a vehicle is not considered a deadly weapon unless the operator is using the vehicle as a deadly weapon and no other reasonable means to avoid potential serious harm are immediately available to the officer.
(4) For purposes of this section, "vehicular pursuit" means an attempt by a uniformed peace officer in a vehicle equipped with emergency lights and a siren to stop a moving vehicle where the operator of the moving vehicle appears to be aware that the officer is signaling the operator to stop the vehicle and the operator of the moving vehicle appears to be willfully resisting or ignoring the officer's attempt to stop the vehicle by increasing vehicle speed, making evasive maneuvers, or operating the vehicle in a reckless manner that endangers the safety of the community or the officer.


So, there you have it.

BTW, that's an outdated WSP pursuit policy, from 2003....

_________________
NO DISASSEMBLE!


Thomas Paine wrote:
"He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."


Mon Nov 15, 2021 2:18 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Tulsa, Ok
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013
Posts: 2336
Real Name: Jeremy
"The officer in consultation with the supervising officer must consider alternatives to the vehicular pursuit"

He's too close for missiles Sarge... I'm switching to guns.


Mon Nov 15, 2021 4:02 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: The banana belt of MT
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015
Posts: 8703
Real Name: Brian
Pablo...get a John boat and waders. Be a hero. ;)

_________________
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me."- Hunter S. Thompson


Mon Nov 15, 2021 5:50 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: RENTON
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011
Posts: 20841
Real Name: John
TechnoWeenie wrote:
dreadi wrote:
Caveman Jim wrote:
cmica wrote:
In Washington State, a new law passed this year prevents officers from chasing a car just because it’s stolen. Vehicle pursuits are now reserved only for crimes that pose a public safety risk. If a cop tries to pull someone in a stolen car over and the driver doesn’t stop, the cop has to let him go.



https://www.q13fox.com/news/pcsd-pierce ... cars-rises



pretty sure a bunch of fucking (democraps) Progressive/socialist/communist passed this


These MF’rs have taken over and are hiding under the Democrat flag. I am not advocating to saying that Democrats are good but there’s a big difference. Real Democrat voters are hoodwinked once again.
The thing is, the content of that link is not true.

Being in possession of a stolen vehicle is a felony. Police can pursue someone committing a felony.

https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9a.56.068

Here’s the WSP policy about vehicle pursuits.

https://www.waspc.org/assets/Profession ... ursuit.pdf


BLACK HAMMER ARMS
Type 07 Class 2 NFA Dealer
http://www.blackhammerarms.com
http://www.facebook.com/blackhammerarms
https://www.instagram.com/blackhammerarms
GLOCK Certified Armourer



The law doesn't say 'felony', it says violent crime, then lists a couple examples.. It also says that the outcome of catching the person has to outweigh any risk, which is vague as all hell, and since anyone fleeing can cause an accident at any time, it's 'too risky'...

Quote:
RCW 10.116.060
Vehicular pursuit.
(1) A peace officer may not engage in a vehicular pursuit, unless:
(a)(i) There is probable cause to believe that a person in the vehicle has committed or is committing a violent offense or sex offense as defined in RCW 9.94A.030, or an escape under chapter 9A.76 RCW; or
(ii) There is reasonable suspicion a person in the vehicle has committed or is committing a driving under the influence offense under RCW 46.61.502;
(b) The pursuit is necessary for the purpose of identifying or apprehending the person;
(c) The person poses an imminent threat to the safety of others and the safety risks of failing to apprehend or identify the person are considered to be greater than the safety risks of the vehicular pursuit under the circumstances; and
(d)(i) Except as provided in (d)(ii) of this subsection, the officer has received authorization to engage in the pursuit from a supervising officer and there is supervisory control of the pursuit. The officer in consultation with the supervising officer must consider alternatives to the vehicular pursuit. The supervisor must consider the justification for the vehicular pursuit and other safety considerations, including but not limited to speed, weather, traffic, road conditions, and the known presence of minors in the vehicle, and the vehicular pursuit must be terminated if any of the requirements of this subsection are not met;
(ii) For those jurisdictions with fewer than 10 commissioned officers, if a supervisor is not on duty at the time, the officer will request the on-call supervisor be notified of the pursuit according to the agency's procedures. The officer must consider alternatives to the vehicular pursuit, the justification for the vehicular pursuit, and other safety considerations, including but not limited to speed, weather, traffic, road conditions, and the known presence of minors in the vehicle. The officer must terminate the vehicular pursuit if any of the requirements of this subsection are not met.
(2) A pursuing officer shall comply with any agency procedures for designating the primary pursuit vehicle and determining the appropriate number of vehicles permitted to participate in the vehicular pursuit and comply with any agency procedures for coordinating operations with other jurisdictions, including available tribal police departments when applicable.
(3) A peace officer may not fire a weapon upon a moving vehicle unless necessary to protect against an imminent threat of serious physical harm resulting from the operator's or a passenger's use of a deadly weapon. For the purposes of this subsection, a vehicle is not considered a deadly weapon unless the operator is using the vehicle as a deadly weapon and no other reasonable means to avoid potential serious harm are immediately available to the officer.
(4) For purposes of this section, "vehicular pursuit" means an attempt by a uniformed peace officer in a vehicle equipped with emergency lights and a siren to stop a moving vehicle where the operator of the moving vehicle appears to be aware that the officer is signaling the operator to stop the vehicle and the operator of the moving vehicle appears to be willfully resisting or ignoring the officer's attempt to stop the vehicle by increasing vehicle speed, making evasive maneuvers, or operating the vehicle in a reckless manner that endangers the safety of the community or the officer.


So, there you have it.

BTW, that's an outdated WSP pursuit policy, from 2003....


I saw that when i looked it up. Not to mention all the public statements from PD Brass that they would err on the side of caution regarding the new Law.

_________________
Mr. Q wrote: so basically, if you have to smoke some asshole, make sure they become fertilizer and then Bounce? got it.

Guntrader wrote: Huh, maybe I was an asshole.

NRA Member/RSO
SAF 5 Year Donor
GOA Member


Mon Nov 15, 2021 5:57 pm
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Idaho, Land of the Free
Joined: Wed May 1, 2013
Posts: 22302
Real Name: Vick Lagina
Pablo wrote:
JohnMBrowning wrote:
Pablo wrote:
Creek on south side of property burst the bank. Shit.


Total FAIL without pics.... :peep:


Shit man, I wasn't carrying my phone. Had shovel in hand. OK so far but below I think road in is flooded. I could see down to the corner and it was covered.........this creek has no name, seasonal. Water just pouring off the Sumas mountain and hills.......soil is saturated,


hope he doesn't get hung up in your fence... icon_eek

https://komonews.com/news/local/officia ... loodwaters

_________________
“I really don't care, Margaret." ~JD Vance


Wed Nov 17, 2021 9:23 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 29342 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688, 1689, 1690, 1691 ... 1957  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: A Null, foggood11, golddigger14s, Massivedesign, PW45 and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum



Rules WGO Chat Room Gear Rent Me NRA SAF CCKRBA
Calendar


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.
[ Time : 0.158s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]