Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:16 am
Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:59 am
A.Oster wrote:Because only common citizens go to jail. Politicians, business elites, and anyone connected to them never do. Regardless of how much they steal, lie, or mismanage.
Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:04 am
foothills wrote:A.Oster wrote:Because only common citizens go to jail. Politicians, business elites, and anyone connected to them never do. Regardless of how much they steal, lie, or mismanage.
Tell that to the Watergate 7, or Martha Stewart, Bernie Madoff, and last but not least, Blago (Rod Blagojevich).
There are jail sentences for these types...but the DOJ has to have the integrity to pursue them...and with this admin it ain't gonna happen to Reid.
Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:12 am
Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:04 am
Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:07 am
“The door isn’t closed. We’ll figure out how to move forward with this,” BLM spokesman Craig Leff told the Associated Press, adding, “The BLM and National Park Service did not cut any deal and negotiate anything, there was no deal we made.”
This completely contradicts reports on Saturday which stated that, “A deal has been reached between the Bundy family and the Bureau of Land Management.”
In another twist, private investigator Doug Hagmann claims a Department of Homeland Security source told him that the federal stand down on Saturday was merely a temporary measure designed to “hoodwink” Bundy supporters into “believing that the situation is being resolved”.
Hagmann says his source told him the plan to release the cattle had been devised the day before and that Saturday’s activities were focused around a military assessment of the strength of the “resistance” shown by Bundy supporters.
Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:13 am
General Nonsense wrote:I can't verify this story.
http://www.truthandaction.org/breaking-feds-returning-to-bundy-ranch/“The door isn’t closed. We’ll figure out how to move forward with this,” BLM spokesman Craig Leff told the Associated Press, adding, “The BLM and National Park Service did not cut any deal and negotiate anything, there was no deal we made.”
This completely contradicts reports on Saturday which stated that, “A deal has been reached between the Bundy family and the Bureau of Land Management.”
In another twist, private investigator Doug Hagmann claims a Department of Homeland Security source told him that the federal stand down on Saturday was merely a temporary measure designed to “hoodwink” Bundy supporters into “believing that the situation is being resolved”.
Hagmann says his source told him the plan to release the cattle had been devised the day before and that Saturday’s activities were focused around a military assessment of the strength of the “resistance” shown by Bundy supporters.
Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:35 am
Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:37 am
Eddie Dean wrote:a jail cell is too good for harry reid and his shit bag son. there's something else that is better suited for them, and it involves a hole in the ground.
Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:44 am
Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:56 am
Urban X wrote:Strange twist here
Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:16 pm
Urban X wrote:Strange twist here
Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:32 pm
Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:41 pm
Urban X wrote:Strange twist here
Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:50 pm
Urban X wrote:They think it was set up to be a slaughter of the agents guarding the cattle at the gate. 500 against 20-30 of them, and they figure the 20 or so would have been dead in 30 seconds or so. I agree it was a horrible position they were in and made little sense. They were down in a hole and would have had to contend with fire potentially from three sides. Something like what happened in Operation Red Wing/Lone Survivor for instance. So, basically what they are saying is that the 20 guys guarding were setup (not knowingly) to create a conflict with the enraged "militia" and would be slaughtered, which would in turn create a monstrocity of media spin and public outrage, bringing on the end of the Second Amendment in the US. Something to that effect. They said something about an armored vehicle and SWAT down the road as well, but I don't really get their point as much with that. One of the big points they made was about why those guys weren't communicated to in relation to the release of the cattle.