Page 1 of 1

Mack Worley

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 9:20 pm
by danoh
Open Carry with a rifle?

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/warnin ... -arrested/

I'd like some opinions about this....................

I did a search first and found nothing.

Re: Mack Worley

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 9:31 pm
by usrifle
Sounds just like that case in Texas with the Vet. I don't see any video, but I question the purpose of walking around with an AR-15, even if we "can".
Overbearing Cops who don't understand the laws, or choose to ignore them is the problem here.
Yeah, yeah, I get the excersizing our OC right, but in this day and age I don't feel that's a proper way to excersize said right and may result in a situation none of us want.
Just my .02, and I get your side if you differ in the opinion.

Re: Mack Worley

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 9:45 pm
by AR15L
I'll add this to the mix.
How many of you have done a parking lot meet to sell a gun/rifle?
Of those that have done the above, do you ask the buyer to: not hold up higher than the window, don't take it off the back seat or out of the trunk? Did the buyer complain?
Of the things I've sold, not one buyer complained. In fact they all said, I understand. No one got upset. Why? Maybe because we both wanted to go home for dinner or a beer without having to spend the next two hours trying to educate the local po po.

Re: Mack Worley

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 9:55 pm
by moktor
He was ultimately found guilty at trial. He talks about the trial in this podcast:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onthemoves ... hemoveshow

He was convicted of a gross misdemeanor under RCW 9.41.270 - Weapons apparently capable of producing bodily harm — Unlawful carrying or handling

(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to carry, exhibit, display, or draw any firearm, dagger, sword, knife or other cutting or stabbing instrument, club, or any other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons.


Being found guilty of that also comes with the added bonus of the revocation of one's CPL.

Re: Mack Worley

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 11:03 pm
by usrifle
moktor wrote:He was ultimately found guilty at trial. He talks about the trial in this podcast:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onthemoves ... hemoveshow

He was convicted of a gross misdemeanor under RCW 9.41.270 - Weapons apparently capable of producing bodily harm — Unlawful carrying or handling

(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to carry, exhibit, display, or draw any firearm, dagger, sword, knife or other cutting or stabbing instrument, club, or any other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons.


Being found guilty of that also comes with the added bonus of the revocation of one's CPL.


Again....I saw no video and don't know the facts, so I reserve judgement at this point.

Re: Mack Worley

Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 2:13 am
by Soldier_Citizen
http://www.infowars.com/video-veteran-a ... pen-carry/

Pulled this from the open carry Vancouver page. He actually does a "constitution class" every month or so at a coffee shop down here