WaGuns.org

TechnoWeenie wrote:Glocks are good guns... I've owned a couple... But they're not for me.

Glocks fan boys remind me of Apple fan boys... And the prices reflect it.. Just like Apple.


Everyone must have one and if you don't, you're stupid.

There are better guns out there, IMO...

Funny, I was having the same thoughts about the Shield fanboys. I'm glad there are so many choices.

B.Random wrote:Not at all because the iphone costs the same amount for anybody. This is the same as people paying over sticker price on a car just to have it first.

Standing in line for 12 hours is the same as over paying. Time is money. Figure minimum wage is 10 bucks, times however many hours a person stands in the cold and rain, equal paying to much.

oldkim wrote:. . . let the fools pay what the "market value" may be...I got my Glock 42 (.380) for $369

What about these chestnuts?
- You get what you pay for (so pay more to get the best).
- Pay (a lot) once, cry once; get a 'deal', cry many times.

'At the end of the day' you still have a .380, so you're essentially unarmed.

All of this I've learned from firearms forum experts, so it must be true.

DocNugent wrote:

oldkim wrote:. . . let the fools pay what the "market value" may be...I got my Glock 42 (.380) for $369

What about these chestnuts?
- You get what you pay for (so pay more to get the best).
- Pay (a lot) once, cry once; get a 'deal', cry many times.

'At the end of the day' you still have a .380, so you're essentially unarmed.

All of this I've learned from firearms forum experts, so it must be true.

I was briefly thinking if $50 was worth the savings of a G42 over a G43, but you'd make that up with ammo costs in fairly short order.