Racial unrest, end game?

[Mr. Q]

Tonight I had a bit of an epiphany.
If there were mass racial unrest, we can be certain that at some point firearms would play a significant part.
Could the end game of such riots be the mass door-to-door confiscation of firearms?

You know...for everyones safety.
All civilian firearms need to be collected to stop needless deaths. And, if the people are all disarmed..police officers would be safer and less likely to resort to their firearms to stop people. Everyone benefits and the world is safer.

"According to the Geneva-based Small Arms Survey – the leading source of international public information about firearms – the U.S. has the best-armed civilian population in the world, with an estimated 270 million total guns. That’s an average of 89 firearms for every 100 residents...."
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/19/how-many-people-own-guns-in-america-and-is-gun-ownership-actually-declining/

uh, no way. door to door confiscation of firearms? you are outside your mind dude, that'll never won't happen.
race baiting, in my opinion, was never really meant for anything other than to divide this country and allow the rich to get richer and the poor to get poorer. my tin foil hat theory has to do with the accumulation of wealth and power versus anything else. the war on guns? it's so the general population does not have the ability to take over by force. top 0.1% richest people in the united states doing what they do best, pull the strings....it's their America, we just live in it.

This is a valid point. However, race baiting doesn't make the rich richer. The rich don't really gain anything from riots.

Here is what I am thinking:
Riots break out, grow in scale. Sooner or later people start using firearms for self-defense of their property or persons.
The "Bad apples" in the riot crowds arm themselves and shoot back. The police try to step in, they get shot at. Businesses and cars are robbed at gun point.
The gangs declare open season on cops and armed targets. As a result, more innocents are killed as well.
We end up with months of some extremely high firearm death rates.
The media of course would play this to the full hilt.

Some politician comes along and says, "we need to do something.... we need to get ALL guns off the streets, and the only way to do this is to enact a full confiscation of all firearms. "
2A supports go nuts at the thought.
In typical knee-jerk reaction some super left congressman drafts an Amendment revoking the 2nd. "This archaic policy has got to go...it's allowed this blood shed to happen."
Racial spokesmen are all for it if it means that it save racial lives.
And if we have a left-leaning President....it gets Presidential support.
And in typical lock step fashion, congress passes it.
The government starts a program to reward people who turn in gun owners. "See a gun, Report it, get a $1000 reward"
Gun owners only comprise about 30% of the US population...you don't think that the other 70% would be jumping at the chance to make some money?

I am not sure that it would take all the much to make this kind of jump.
One school shooting caused congress to almost ban the AR15, high cap mags, and several other things.
DHS has gone out of their way to engrain the population with their "See something, Say something" program.

What would politicians do if the nation-wide firearm murder rate suddenly doubled across the USA?
From 3.5 per 100K on average or 11,208 per year (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/homicide.htm)
To 7 per 100K or 22,416 people per year

They would go nuts on gun control, that's what they would do.

You need to follow the stock market. Betting on futures, short selling stocks, etc... trust me, the rich get richer.

[TechnoWeenie]

Not sure if this should go in Bmore thread, or here... Meh...

Apparently someone laid it out for the slow ones that didn't quite get it..

Dear Black Thugs: You’re Making It Hard For White Devils to Believe You’re Innocent Children
According to the Media, President Obama and the slick-haired Al Sharpton, we white devils are supposed to feel very sorry for the plight of the black teen.

I believe Americans, by and large, do have sympathy for any person or group who’ve had life deal them a bad hand.
However, young black thugs, you’ve got to work with us a little bit because you’re kind of operating against the storyline the aforementioned are singing about y’all, and thus, making it difficult for us to soulfully commiserate.
Of what, pray tell, do I speak?
Well, homeslice, it goes something like this: For us to give a crap about your below-par existence we’d like to hear less and less about…

- Your ghastly grades in school

- Your ridiculous dropout rates
- Your colossal out of wedlock birthrates

- Your embracing of a musical culture that celebrates the shooting of cops and doing filthy, vile things to someone’s daughter

- Your love affair with drugs and alcohol

- Your ?#?hatethem? tweets aimed at white people

- Your flash mobbing and robbing places and people

- Your audacity to blame everybody and their dog for your odious behavior

- And your ginormous, misplaced racial chip on your shoulder

Yes, if you could/would chill on some of that stuff, well … That’d be great. That would make us crackers think, “Hey, maybe you’re serious about getting out of the ditch you’re in.”

Another difficult thing that makes it hard for us to believe you’re just poor, helpless victims of the machine is when a couple of teens from your crew gun down an innocent, twenty-two-year-old, white, Aussie student just to spice up the inherent boredom which accompanies the dog-days of summer. That act of uncut evil helps us not. Yep, that heinous stunt really makes all this “poor you” crap fly right out our windows.

And lastly, and I hate to be negative, but there was one more incident perpetrated by two black teens that also unraveled the sweet story Sharpton and the President would have us believe. It was the beating death of an eighty-eight-year-old, WWII vet in Spokane, Washington. That demonic deed, coupled with the murder of Chris Lane, makes it impossible for anyone with a brain to feel anything towards your personal dilemma except, “Whiskey Tango Foxtrot.”

Yes, the brutal murder of someone’s grandpa and the senseless slaying of someone’s son by black thugs do nothing but reinforce what the FBI National Crime Victimization Survey concluded, namely, that young black males are seven times more likely to commit murder than people of other races.

So, young black thugs, if you’d like us to empathize, trust and help you with a hand-up, howzabout cease and desist with the inhumane behavior, huh? Until then, we’ll be suspicious of young black teens, traveling in groups, taking an unusual interest in our person, especially if they’re dressed like gangbangers and are acting suspiciously.

Call us weird.

[finster]

Tonight I had a bit of an epiphany.
If there were mass racial unrest, we can be certain that at some point firearms would play a significant part.
Could the end game of such riots be the mass door-to-door confiscation of firearms?

You know...for everyones safety.
All civilian firearms need to be collected to stop needless deaths. And, if the people are all disarmed..police officers would be safer and less likely to resort to their firearms to stop people. Everyone benefits and the world is safer.

"According to the Geneva-based Small Arms Survey – the leading source of international public information about firearms – the U.S. has the best-armed civilian population in the world, with an estimated 270 million total guns. That’s an average of 89 firearms for every 100 residents...."
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/19/how-many-people-own-guns-in-america-and-is-gun-ownership-actually-declining/

uh, no way. door to door confiscation of firearms? you are outside your mind dude, that'll never won't happen.
race baiting, in my opinion, was never really meant for anything other than to divide this country and allow the rich to get richer and the poor to get poorer. my tin foil hat theory has to do with the accumulation of wealth and power versus anything else. the war on guns? it's so the general population does not have the ability to take over by force. top 0.1% richest people in the united states doing what they do best, pull the strings....it's their America, we just live in it.

This is a valid point. However, race baiting doesn't make the rich richer. The rich don't really gain anything from riots.

Here is what I am thinking:
Riots break out, grow in scale. Sooner or later people start using firearms for self-defense of their property or persons.
The "Bad apples" in the riot crowds arm themselves and shoot back. The police try to step in, they get shot at. Businesses and cars are robbed at gun point.
The gangs declare open season on cops and armed targets. As a result, more innocents are killed as well.
We end up with months of some extremely high firearm death rates.
The media of course would play this to the full hilt.

Some politician comes along and says, "we need to do something.... we need to get ALL guns off the streets, and the only way to do this is to enact a full confiscation of all firearms. "
2A supports go nuts at the thought.
In typical knee-jerk reaction some super left congressman drafts an Amendment revoking the 2nd. "This archaic policy has got to go...it's allowed this blood shed to happen."
Racial spokesmen are all for it if it means that it save racial lives.
And if we have a left-leaning President....it gets Presidential support.
And in typical lock step fashion, congress passes it.
The government starts a program to reward people who turn in gun owners. "See a gun, Report it, get a $1000 reward"
Gun owners only comprise about 30% of the US population...you don't think that the other 70% would be jumping at the chance to make some money?

I am not sure that it would take all the much to make this kind of jump.
One school shooting caused congress to almost ban the AR15, high cap mags, and several other things.
DHS has gone out of their way to engrain the population with their "See something, Say something" program.

What would politicians do if the nation-wide firearm murder rate suddenly doubled across the USA?
From 3.5 per 100K on average or 11,208 per year (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/homicide.htm)
To 7 per 100K or 22,416 people per year

They would go nuts on gun control, that's what they would do.

You need to follow the stock market. Betting on futures, short selling stocks, etc... trust me, the rich get richer.

I agree with this and would point out that unrest such as riots scare the average suburban white person. This fear will be used to make scapegoats out of the "parasitic" "thugs" who are coming to take all their stuff! Fox news watchers always talk about welfare queens and the lawless animal like thugs. This fear is being used for a distraction for the upcoming economic collapse.

I have said that a larger collapse is coming since watching fucking Ben Bernanke and Hank Paulson (who was the CEO of the company who can be blamed for creating cdo's which caused such a massive failure in the first place) pay out the bankers and investors who had just blackmailed our entire country.

Hank Paulson and others essentially burned down their businesses for insurance money and then asked the government to bail them out when their insurance company was going bankrupt. There is another collapse coming and there isn't anything beyond some amazing breakthrough in technology that can save the economy. There are too many reasons to list for the oncoming crisis but the biggest problem is that nothing changed after the collapse except the banks knew they could get away with it.

If my analysis is correct than this is most likely the agenda behind provoking racial tension. It organizes people and if you believe Julian Assange (sp?) than the elite's goal is to organize people into popular organizations which they can then control through donations, intimidation, subversion, blackmail just as they have so often in the past. This allows people to feel like they are making a difference and keeps them occupied with their cause.