Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:52 pm
SEA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WaGuns.org
The 2nd Amendment Has never looked so good..
https://www.waguns.org/
2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Page 48 of 94
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:17 am
HAWKS!!
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 8:25 am
leadcounsel wrote:NWGunner wrote:I realize your Randall Cunningham references was a "look over here" because your earlier points had been refuted, but I just can't let this nonsense pass:
"Cunningham did more with less..."
The 1988 team that you say 'he' turned around had Jerome Brown, Reggie White, Mike Golic, Mike Quick, Keith Byars, Eric Allen , Terry Hoage, etc., No one would say HE turned the team around, especially when they were know as one of the great defenses of all time.
And the team he was on in Minnesota HAD 10 HALL OF FAMERS on it. Even went 15-1 and couldn't get it done.
Saying he did more with less is preposterous both in theory, and in fact.
Yeah, you made my point for me. Thanks.
The 98 season was in the TWILIGHT of his career, his 14th season, after a serious knee injury and him being replaced and traded.
And yet in 98, after a season ending knee injury, losing a lot of speed and mobility, in his 14th season, Cunningham STILL posted similar figures and QB rating (106) similar to Wilson in his prime (110 rating), now 20 years later... You can't credit or blame a QB or any 1 player for a Super Bowl btw. It's a team effort.
Their PERSONAL BEST season stats, Cunningham as a venerable injured QB in his twilight and Wilson in his prime, are nearly identical in each column.
Cunninhams best personal season was 1998
Wilsons best personal season was 2015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randall_Cunningham
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... lsRu00.htm
Now, just imagine a younger, faster, non-injured Cunningham as a rookie stepping into that situation with 16 pro-bowlers on the team for the first 5 years. Likely to have also won a SB or two, and had al-time high personal stats.
What is it? Cocaine, crack? Meth? Booze? Something has turned your brain to mud.
You can't possibly be serious.
Objection overruled. Bailiff, whack his pee pee!
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 8:32 am
leadcounsel wrote:
And yet in 98, after a season ending knee injury, losing a lot of speed and mobility, in his 14th season, Cunningham STILL posted similar figures and QB rating (106) similar to Wilson in his prime (110 rating), now 20 years later...
Wilson in his prime? You mean like last year when he sustained 2 season ending knee injuries and played out the rest of the season with massively limited mobility wearing knee braces(a huge hindrance to such a mobile quarterback) and still put up awesome numbers? Yeah, prime. Not sure how you could mention knee injuries and overlook that. Doesn't fit your narrative?
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 10:32 am
sinus211 wrote:leadcounsel wrote:
And yet in 98, after a season ending knee injury, losing a lot of speed and mobility, in his 14th season, Cunningham STILL posted similar figures and QB rating (106) similar to Wilson in his prime (110 rating), now 20 years later...
Wilson in his prime? You mean like last year when he sustained 2 season ending knee injuries and played out the rest of the season with massively limited mobility wearing knee braces(a huge hindrance to such a mobile quarterback) and still put up awesome numbers? Yeah, prime. Not sure how you could mention knee injuries and overlook that. Doesn't fit your narrative?
If.you stop feeding the troll he wont spend hours googling stuff for hours and can have a productive day
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 12:54 pm
sinus211 wrote:leadcounsel wrote:
And yet in 98, after a season ending knee injury, losing a lot of speed and mobility, in his 14th season, Cunningham STILL posted similar figures and QB rating (106) similar to Wilson in his prime (110 rating), now 20 years later...
Wilson in his prime? You mean like last year when he sustained 2 season ending knee injuries and played out the rest of the season with massively limited mobility wearing knee braces(a huge hindrance to such a mobile quarterback) and still put up awesome numbers? Yeah, prime. Not sure how you could mention knee injuries and overlook that. Doesn't fit your narrative?
If he kept playing after the knee injury then how was it season ending?
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 1:26 pm
Random.
Erin Andrews is getting hotter every year.
Erin Andrews is getting hotter every year.
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 1:31 pm
Jonathan Brown wrote:Random.
Erin Andrews is getting hotter every year.
Dat Ass....
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 9:09 pm
Jonathan Brown wrote:Random.
Erin Andrews is getting hotter every year.
She definitely looks sharp with that Farrah Fawcett hair.
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:33 am
Not bad for a 5'10" QB, drafted in the third round, playing behind an abysmal Oline.
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:59 am
Jeremy Lane gets the start. Just saying that, is painful.
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:05 am
L_O_G wrote:Not bad for a 5'10" QB, drafted in the third round, playing behind an abysmal Oline.
Well, in fairness, such a stat could ONLY be held by a QB since passing yards always accumulate faster than rushing yards.
And that stat largely just reflects no diversity in an offense (e.g. no running game). That's no speculation. Seattle is in the bottom 1/3rd and has among the worst rushing offense for 2017. Ranked around 22 or 23 in the league.
As a result, surprise, they pass the ball more than most other teams. Seattle is #3 in passing attempts and overall #3-10 in overall passing stats. So, in top 1/3rd for passing and in the bottom 3rd for rushing. Tada - QB is going to have the lions share of yards from scrimmage.
So, again, nice attempt to twist stats and facts. But Seattle averages 100 y/g rushing. Not really something to write home about.
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:06 am
No Kam
No Sherm
Duane Brown, Jarran Reed, & Wilhouite all doubtful/game time decisions
Having a 3rd string LT guard against a guy that had 6 sacks against Dallas last week is going to be ugly. Matt Ryan and Julio Jones throwing all over the field with a rookie and a crap CB is going to be ugly.
This game is going to be ugly, Hawks lose this one by 10+
No Sherm
Duane Brown, Jarran Reed, & Wilhouite all doubtful/game time decisions
Having a 3rd string LT guard against a guy that had 6 sacks against Dallas last week is going to be ugly. Matt Ryan and Julio Jones throwing all over the field with a rookie and a crap CB is going to be ugly.
This game is going to be ugly, Hawks lose this one by 10+
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:11 am
leadcounsel wrote:L_O_G wrote:Not bad for a 5'10" QB, drafted in the third round, playing behind an abysmal Oline.
Well, in fairness, such a stat could ONLY be held by a QB since passing yards always accumulate faster than rushing yards.
And that stat largely just reflects no diversity in an offense (e.g. no running game). That's no speculation. Seattle is in the bottom 1/3rd and has among the worst rushing offense for 2017. Ranked around 22 or 23 in the league.
So, again, nice attempt to twist stats and facts. But Seattle averages 100 y/g rushing. Not really something to write home about.
How am I twisting facts by posting what the NFL put out on social media today? Your argument is weak, you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about, and with every single post in this thread you are making yourself look more and more foolish.
Re: 2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:14 am
As a result, surprise, they pass the ball more than most other teams. Seattle is #3 in passing attempts and overall #3-10 in overall passing stats. So, in top 1/3rd for passing and in the bottom 3rd for rushing. Tada - QB is going to have the lions share of yards from scrimmage.
It's easy to make it appear he's more impressive than anyone. But it's just a reflection of the above average-powered Seattle offense, ranked 9. Yawn.
Russell has all the passing yards, which is ~2500. Duh. Several other QBs have more.
He also has 290 rushing yards. Eh. It's not uncommon for QBs to compile decent rushing stats from scrambling, often clipping off 20-30 yards at a time.
Problem is Seattle doesn't have any solid RBs to turn to. So, again, they pass a lot and Russell has to run around a lot.
It's easy to make it appear he's more impressive than anyone. But it's just a reflection of the above average-powered Seattle offense, ranked 9. Yawn.
Russell has all the passing yards, which is ~2500. Duh. Several other QBs have more.
He also has 290 rushing yards. Eh. It's not uncommon for QBs to compile decent rushing stats from scrambling, often clipping off 20-30 yards at a time.
Problem is Seattle doesn't have any solid RBs to turn to. So, again, they pass a lot and Russell has to run around a lot.