WaGuns.org

Jonathan Brown wrote:Blind obedience and allegiance to either party right now is unacceptable.

What a load of shit

George wrote:

Jonathan Brown wrote:Blind obedience and allegiance to either party right now is unacceptable.

What a load of shit

Oh, so you're all down with the blind obedience? Sweet.

Blind obedience is defined as the unquestioning adherence to inherently imprecise rules, even in the face of silly or adverse consequences. More simply, blind obedience is essentially doing something because you are told, you adhere to the rules because they are the rules.

Alpine wrote:Levin is a brilliant constitutional scholar and lawyer.

we are blessed to have true patriots like Levin and Rush.

Rush.

George wrote:

Jonathan Brown wrote:Blind obedience and allegiance to either party right now is unacceptable.

What a load of shit

George, that took me by surprise. I was under the impression that everyone would find agreement with JB's statement no matter which side of the discussion they're on.

What part of JB's statement do you disagree with and why?
The only space for disagreement for me might be that there was no qualifier before the word "allegiance" like there was before "obedience". My assumption was that the adjective "blind" applied to both.

Both parties work in step to preserve the cash flow.

Too big to fail? "Too Networked to Jail":

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/Voices/201 ... m_medium=1

PMB wrote:

George wrote:

Jonathan Brown wrote:Blind obedience and allegiance to either party right now is unacceptable.

What a load of shit

George, that took me by surprise. I was under the impression that everyone would find agreement with JB's statement no matter which side of the discussion they're on.

What part of JB's statement do you disagree with and why?
The only space for disagreement for me might be that there was no qualifier before the word "allegiance" like there was before "obedience". My assumption was that the adjective "blind" applied to both.

He was insinuating that there was a blind obedience or allegiance from members of this forum. I have neither blind obedience or allegiance.

If we had Hillary as president you could kiss our 2nd amendment rights goodby.

There is no evidence that Trump colluded with Russia. Even deep-state James Comey said there was nothing. Julianne Assange said that he did not get Podesta's emails from any state, ie not from Russia. Trump never wrote Potesta's emails. The deep-state globalist, liberal/socialist media, liberal/socialist celebrities, lying obstructionist congress, and the whole resist movement are doing everything they can to remove a legitimate president. Hillary should be locked up, as well as many of Obama's cabinet. Trump never rigged the democrat's primary, like Hillary did. Trump never hired Huma Abedin. Trump never sent classified emails to Anthony Weiner. Trump never called Americans deplorables. Trump never lied about Benghazi. Trump never had a private server with classified information stored on it.

Trump had a better message; America First, build a wall, crack down on sanctuary cities, protect our 2nd amendment, reduce the size of government, reduce the deficit, help our police, remove harmful regulations, grow jobs, cut and simplify taxes, improve our infrastructure, build a strong military but use it only when absolutely needed, repeal then replace Obama Care and drain the swamp. The swamp is full of deep-state globalist that want to destroy our republic, helped by George Soros, the Bilderberg Group and ilk.

George wrote:

PMB wrote:George, that took me by surprise. I was under the impression that everyone would find agreement with JB's statement no matter which side of the discussion they're on.

What part of JB's statement do you disagree and why?

He was insinuating that there was a blind obedience or allegiance from members of this forum. I have neither blind obedience or allegiance

JB's statements are always absolutes.

And they always absolutely undermine any point he makes.

He seems to think he's being clever and curt......but, no

NWGunner wrote:

George wrote:

PMB wrote:George, that took me by surprise. I was under the impression that everyone would find agreement with JB's statement no matter which side of the discussion they're on.

What part of JB's statement do you disagree and why?

He was insinuating that there was a blind obedience or allegiance from members of this forum. I have neither blind obedience or allegiance

JB's statements are always absolutes.

And they always absolutely undermine any point he makes.

He seems to think he's being clever and curt......but, no

Roger that ... and exceedingly condescending

The swamp is so large.
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-enviro ... e-of-trump

Trump should cut at least half of the federal government jobs and get rid of several agencies. The problem is congress is part of the swamp.

Your blind obedience is a weakness.

All right, let me make something very clear: Simply being shitty to each other isn't helpful or interesting, and it hurts the community.

Do it, and you're gone. No matter which side you're on.

Keep the conversation intelligent, and I don't care what opinion you have, it's welcome here.

Jonathan Brown wrote:Your blind obedience is a weakness.

That's funny... good try

George wrote:

Jonathan Brown wrote:Your blind obedience is a weakness.

That's funny... good try

George is gone for one day. Next?