WaGuns.org

RCW 9.41.290
State preemption.
The state of Washington hereby fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation within the boundaries of the state, including the registration, licensing, possession, purchase, sale, acquisition, transfer, discharge, and transportation of firearms, or any other element relating to firearms or parts thereof, including ammunition and reloader components. Cities, towns, and counties or other municipalities may enact only those laws and ordinances relating to firearms that are specifically authorized by state law, as in RCW 9.41.300, and are consistent with this chapter. Such local ordinances shall have the same penalty as provided for by state law. Local laws and ordinances that are inconsistent with, more restrictive than, or exceed the requirements of state law shall not be enacted and are preempted and repealed, regardless of the nature of the code, charter, or home rule status of such city, town, county, or municipality.

TINCANBANDIT wrote:Are they going to tax free speech and churches as well?

FUCK this state, I hate these commie mother fucking shit eating worthless sack o shits.....

BTW THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU VOTE DEMOCRAT RAISE CHILDREN TO GROW UP BELIEVING THE STATE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SAFETY

there I said my piece, back to work

PMB wrote:

TINCANBANDIT wrote:Are they going to tax free speech and churches as well?

FUCK this state, I hate these commie mother fucking shit eating worthless sack o shits.....

BTW THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU VOTE DEMOCRAT RAISE CHILDREN TO GROW UP BELIEVING THE STATE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SAFETY

there I said my piece, back to work

I just can't get past that this is more of a societal thing than a political issue. It seems like just (almost?) a matter of fate that this particular bit of Controllism ended up in the D side of the coin instead of the R.
Controllism exists in both political parties, even if it is worse in the D's right now.

leadcounsel wrote:Hurts my brain too.

I'd love to see the legal profession automatically disbar lawyers in these positions if they can't read and apply plain laws. Like our good ole AG pal, who clearly struggles with following the law.

TINCANBANDIT wrote:keep fooling yourself, all you need to do is look up who appointed these judges. Remember the SCOTUS decision on Heller Vs DC? If it were not for the Republican nominated Justices we would have lost the Second Amendment

Democrats will NEVER appoint a pro-second amendment judge, end of discussion.

PMB wrote:People genuinely need to be more concerned with individual rights AND responsibilities or we will be fighting this on an election by election basis.