Seattle parking laws to no longer apply to "homeless"
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 8:19 pm
Because we all know how well Ed Murray's "free" vagrant parking lots for drug-den RVs and broken-down cars worked out and because people thought they couldn't get any dumber than "safe injection sites" for narcotic users, it's time to remind you things can always get worse.
Welcome to Seattle, where the ENTIRE CITY will serve as a parking lot for drugged out vagrants.
That's right, under a new ordinance being drafted by the Clowncil, parking laws will no longer apply to vagrants.
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-new ... ordinance/
Look at their lame attempt to deny the obvious:
Of course that's EXACTLY what they are doing. And by "constructively participating" he of course means being present to necessitate more welfare $ in Freeattle as well as votes from their prized hostage-constituency.
This is how it would work at FIRST:
Scattered throughout the city. "Small in scope," but how do we know it will change?
So what happened with the previous social experiment?
Oh yeah...
Someone DID try injecting a tiny bit of sanity:
I think we all know the answer, and even the SeattleSlimes admits it:
If you built it, they will come. Want to start a pool on the count of vagrants living out of their cars by 2020 if this insanity passes?
So, I have a question, who here would be happy to have their house alongside these parking-camping zones?
Wait, I take back what I wrote above, it won't be the ENTIRE city, I guarantee you none of these zones will be within 4 blocks of any council-member's house or the mayor's house.
Welcome to Seattle, where the ENTIRE CITY will serve as a parking lot for drugged out vagrants.
That's right, under a new ordinance being drafted by the Clowncil, parking laws will no longer apply to vagrants.
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-new ... ordinance/
Under the program, police would be free to exempt participants in good standing from several different parking ordinances. That includes laws allowing cops to boot and tow vehicles whose owners have four or more unpaid parking tickets, and rules forcing parked vehicles to be moved every 72 hours.
The aim, O’Brien said, is to provide targeted services for people looking to transition out of homelessness. The ordinance will free them from racking up parking-related fines and penalties that often prevent the homeless from securing apartment residences, he said.
Look at their lame attempt to deny the obvious:
“We’re not waiving parking restrictions or parking enforcement on any subset of the population,” he said. “If you are constructively participating in the program, we would work to be flexible.”
Of course that's EXACTLY what they are doing. And by "constructively participating" he of course means being present to necessitate more welfare $ in Freeattle as well as votes from their prized hostage-constituency.
This is how it would work at FIRST:
The program would create between 40 and 50 safe-parking zones scattered throughout the city. Each one would be small in scope and accommodate around six vehicles.
The ordinance also calls for police to create protocols for tracking vehicles being used as residences, and an amnesty period for participants who have received multiple parking fines.
Scattered throughout the city. "Small in scope," but how do we know it will change?
Still, key aspects of the program have yet to be worked out. Details like where exactly in the city participants in the program will be allowed to park their vehicles free from restrictions are yet to be determined, O’Brien acknowledged.
So what happened with the previous social experiment?
Oh yeah...
Under the pressure of complaints from city residents over sanitation and safety of RVs, Mayor Ed Murray in 2016 issued an executive order creating several “safe lots” for people living in their vehicles. But city officials eventually pulled the plug amid rising costs.
Someone DID try injecting a tiny bit of sanity:
Phil Cochran of Safe Seattle needled O’Brien personally, asking “Do you believe that this ordinance will result in more RVs and more homeless junkies?”
I think we all know the answer, and even the SeattleSlimes admits it:
The number of people using their vehicles as residences has increased in the months since. A 2017 count of the county’s homeless found around 900 vehicles being used as residences in Seattle.
If you built it, they will come. Want to start a pool on the count of vagrants living out of their cars by 2020 if this insanity passes?
So, I have a question, who here would be happy to have their house alongside these parking-camping zones?
Wait, I take back what I wrote above, it won't be the ENTIRE city, I guarantee you none of these zones will be within 4 blocks of any council-member's house or the mayor's house.

