... We come now to a moment of great gravity.

There has been a long effort to counter the official narrative we now call “Russiagate.” This effort has so far focused on the key events noted above, leaving numerous others still to be addressed. Until recently, researchers undertaking this work faced critical shortcomings, and these are to be explained. But they have achieved significant new momentum in the past several weeks, and what they have done now yields very consequential fruit. Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed are now producing evidence disproving the official version of key events last year. Their work is intricate and continues at a kinetic pace as we speak. But its certain results so far are two, simply stated, and freighted with implications:

There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.

Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.

RIP Seth Rich

Sorry to spoil the party, but...
http://www.npr.org/2017/08/16/543830392 ... rich-story

Sorry to spoil the party, but...
http://www.npr.org/2017/08/16/543830392 ... rich-story

I'm definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it.

such a faithful servant you are

so now you present a left wing rag to say that the story about his murder being tied to the DNC leaks was fabricated.....


It is interesting that he was:

A: Close to Hillary Clinton and the DNC
B: Murdered, shot in the back for no apparent reason
C: His case has not been solved.

The facts surrounding the case have waaaaaaay too many similarities to the dozens of other people close to the Clintons that have met their end in mysterious ways...so go ahead and defend the Clintons, I am still waiting to see if ANYONE can come up with a better theory as to why he was killed

New information, everything about the Russia-Trump data hack is a lie.

It takes time for the IT professionals to actually prove what the Leftist press lies about, because digging for the truth takes time.

It was an inside job, and it has been proved the data did not come from Russia, Romania, or anywhere else but the Eastern Time Zone.




https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new ... -dnc-hack/