what a dumbass.

Sounds like a self defense situation.

W
T
F

Tough call

The bike was in front of the car

A bike is far more maneuverable and she could have easily removed herself from the situation

I’ve been in several altercations while riding I-5 and never would have pulled off to chat about it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Just keep on driving. Don't stop.

Multiple postings on FB by people who say they know her, say she's been in trouble with the law multiple times but always manages to get away with it....

But, so far, based on witnesses say, she may be justified....

Don't get in a fight with somebody that has a gun.

I've had a bunch of people go crazy while driving on i90. I've wondered if a giant 24" sticker like this in my rear window would get them to calm down and back off.

https://www.amazon.com/Sticker-Vinyl-De ... 0711K71GV/

I can make those.
FYI

Less than $24?

Probably.
That stuff isn't that expensive. The labor of weeding and transposing the transfer paper kinda makes the expense. I wouldn't be trying to make a profit......I just have the machine and some vinyl

might get you a ticket if it obstructs to much of your rear window

Negative Nancy strikes again!

Wouldn't her claim of self-defense be dependent on who was the initial aggressor in the road rage incident? In other words, if she instigated then her claim of self-defense would be nullified I believe. So a lot of this comes down to who started the bloody thing.

That being said, getting out of your car on a freeway is a really bad idea regardless of the road rage incident. You're taking a big risk of being struck by another vehicle. On top of that you never know who you are going into an altercation with, their state of mind, their physical fighting skills, and/or whether they're packing.

My two cents always better to try to avoid a situation where you might have to use your gun in the first place, it should be a tool of the last resort. Why subject yourself to potential criminal and civil liability IF the whole thing can be reasonably avoided i.e. don't stop and don't get out of your car/off your motorcycle.

Edit: Just saw the post by TW. If true, then it seems pretty cut and dry self-defense. The male decedent instigated the road rage incident then attacked the female after they both pulled over. Under physical disparity of force, it can be reasonably assumed the male is capable of inflicting serious bodily injury or death on a female by virtue of physical size and strength. If the witness statement is true, she likely has a valid claim to self-defense.