Corcept Therapeutics (Corcept.com) manufacturers and markets an abortion pill drug called mifepristone, and Christine Blasey Ford is a co-author of at least eight published scientific papers produced by the pharmaceutical giant to promote its pills. You can see Blasey’s name listed on several publications at this Corcept.com web page detailing their research papers.

Corcept Therapeutics, Inc., a $166 billion market cap company (stock symbol CORT) reportedly has current annual sales of $216 million. The company offers just one drug, mifepristone, which is widely known as an “abortion pill” or RU-486. Many drugs have multiple uses, and mifepristone — brand name “Korlym” at Corcept — is currently marketed by the company for the treatment of Cushing’s syndrome. (h/t to The Gateway Pundit for initial work on this breaking story.)

Like all FDA-approved drugs, mifepristone is frequently prescribed off-label, meaning doctors prescribe it for conditions that it has never been approved to treat. It is well known throughout the medical industry that doctors routinely prescribe this drug to terminate unwanted pregnancies. It is a covert “abortion drug,” in other words.

If Kavanaugh were to be confirmed on the U.S. Supreme Court and be part of a decision that overturns Roe vs. Wade, it would make the prescribing of Corcept’s drug for abortion illegal, directly impacting the bottom line profits of the company for which Christine Blasey works.

I have read through the history books and it is full of bitter fighting between politicians and parties, but the last 20ish years have seemed to be an an acceleration path.
If the D's are successful in this obvious political "trickery" and the R's lose majority.... Then what? Just a hypothetical question.
I am eager to see how the storyline unfolds.

Any info on the scoop that it actually may have been a different dude?

Feinstein is refusing to give Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley the unredacted letter Christine Ford sent Senate Democrats in July further fueling suspicions there is exculpatory evidence in the letter.

Feinstein turned over a redacted version of the letter to the FBI last week. The FBI then added the letter to Kavanaugh's background file, which was then given to the White House and the Judiciary Committee.

Grassley added that the only version of Ford’s letter that he has is the redacted one given to him as part of Kavanaugh's updated background file.

"Had Dr. Ford not made her allegations public via the Washington Post over the weekend, I still would not know her identity," Grassley wrote.

Spokespeople for Feinstein didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about what redactions were made in the letter given to the FBI.

But senators say Ford's name was redacted. A version of the letter posted by CNN also redacted the names of other individuals at the party where Ford alleges Kavanaugh pinned her down and tried to remove her clothing.

Some NEWS on a call that Katz, the attorney for Ford, had with Judiciary earlier as they negotiate terms of hearing next week, per senior Senate source — Katz raised concerns about security and how to ensure Ford’s safety
–Katz raised concerns about potential outside counsel…(bringing in an outside counsel would make it too trial-like, they believe) –Ford does NOT want Kavanaugh in the room when she testifies, and she asked that Kavanaugh testify first –Raised prospect of subpoena for Mark Judge and other potential witnesses”

“Oh! One more tidbit from the call. They are discussing Thursday as a potential hearing date but that is not yet locked down”

Ford’s requests made by her attorney, per NBC News:

-Hearing Thurs. earliest
-Kavanaugh testifies first
-Kavanaugh not in room when she is
-no outside counsel for questioning
-subpoena Mark Judge
-no time limit on her opening stmt
-pool camera only
-movement plan for security

this?

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-20/was-kavanaugh-accuser-almost-raped-his-doppelganger-new-theory-emerges

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/former-scalia-law-clerk-drops-pictures-and-evidence-that-blows-christine-fords-case-wide-open/

ETA: at the bottom of that article:


ETA2: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/407517-grassley-wants-unredacted-version-of-letter-from-kavanaughs-accuser


may not be a huge deal, but still, we don't know...