|
|
 |
 |
It is currently Thu Feb 06, 2025 4:30 pm
|
LAPD shoots innocent bystander
| Author |
Message |
|
CQBgopher
Site Supporter
Location: WA/MT Joined: Thu Sep 6, 2012 Posts: 8438
|
.
Last edited by CQBgopher on Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:47 pm |
|
 |
|
MadPick
Site Admin
Location: Renton, WA Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 Posts: 53102
Real Name: Steve
|
^ After watching that video and reading the story, I can't find fault with the officers' behavior and shooting.
So yeah, they fired into the doorway, and there was some risk with that of hitting an innocent person. (And it turns out they did.) But what if they had NOT fired at him, and let him get into the store? Is there a reasonable chance that he would have killed people inside, taken hostages, etc.? Hell yeah. In fact, he did take hostages.
This guy was a threat to the public, and had already proven that. I think the officers shooting into the doorway was a lower-risk tactic than letting him continue unmolested into the store.
Granted, it didn't really work out the right way in this case, but I'm comfortable that they judged the odds correctly even if they lost this particular bet.
_________________SteveBenefactor Life Member, National Rifle AssociationLife Member, Second Amendment FoundationPatriot & Life Member, Gun Owners of AmericaLife Member, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ArmsLegal Action Supporter, Firearms Policy CoalitionMember, NAGR/NFGRPlease support the organizations that support all of us.Leave it cleaner than you found it.
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:28 pm |
|
 |
|
TechnoWeenie
Site Supporter
Location: Nova Laboratories Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 Posts: 19173
Real Name: Johnny 5
|
To the contrary, IMO. There were people visible near the entrance. Guns should not have been fired in that direction.
_________________NO DISASSEMBLE!Thomas Paine wrote: "He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:42 pm |
|
 |
|
PW45
Site Supporter
Location: Maple Valley Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 Posts: 1010
Real Name: PW
|
Massivedesign wrote: L_O_G wrote: Another day, another thread about how cops should have done something different. Color. Me. Surprised. L_O_G wrote: You sure do like to spend a good chunk of your free time posting threads about how cops always fuck shit up. Why don't you just get off your ass and join? They are hiring. PW45 wrote: :beatdeadhorse5: Seriously guys... Color me suprised that the Anti-TW bandwagon goes on full attack whenever he posts. You have an option here. If you are not strong enough to just ignore him, then FOE him.  Here, i'll make this easy. Click this link and he will automatically be ADDED to your FOE list. If that doesn't work, or you still don't have the willpower to ignore somebody and choose to continually engage a person on the internet, then click this link. I'm sticking next to my picture of Stallone! I only put the dead horse because I edited out something much much worse. I'm neutral in this shit Besides why are you calling me out, I saw a dead horse AND a Trainwreck
_________________ NRA Patriot Patron Life Member SAF Life Member
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:43 pm |
|
 |
|
PW45
Site Supporter
Location: Maple Valley Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 Posts: 1010
Real Name: PW
|
I'll tell you what though, this seems like a pretty fucking huge double standard if you ask me https://q13fox.com/2017/09/08/bonney-la ... -neighbor/
_________________ NRA Patriot Patron Life Member SAF Life Member
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:52 pm |
|
 |
|
leadcounsel
Site Supporter
Location: Can't say Joined: Sun Sep 7, 2014 Posts: 8131
|
MadPick wrote: ^ After watching that video and reading the story, I can't find fault with the officers' behavior and shooting.
So yeah, they fired into the doorway, and there was some risk with that of hitting an innocent person. (And it turns out they did.) But what if they had NOT fired at him, and let him get into the store? Is there a reasonable chance that he would have killed people inside, taken hostages, etc.? Hell yeah. In fact, he did take hostages.
This guy was a threat to the public, and had already proven that. I think the officers shooting into the doorway was a lower-risk tactic than letting him continue unmolested into the store.
Granted, it didn't really work out the right way in this case, but I'm comfortable that they judged the odds correctly even if they lost this particular bet. Bingo. And the analysis and decision was made over about 1 second. A hard unpalatable decision, among many hard unpalatable decisions. Something we shouldn't armchair quarterback the officer about. He made a call, and if it had worked out he'd be a hero. It didn't and that was unfortunate.
_________________ I defend the 2A. US Army Combat Veteran and Paratrooper: OIF Veteran. BSM and MSM recipient. NRA Lifetime. Entertainment purposes only. I'm a lawyer, but have not offered you legal advice.
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 9:21 pm |
|
 |
|
leadcounsel
Site Supporter
Location: Can't say Joined: Sun Sep 7, 2014 Posts: 8131
|
TechnoWeenie wrote: To the contrary, IMO. There were people visible near the entrance. Guns should not have been fired in that direction. To the contrary, that might have been the very reason to attempt to immediately stop the ARMED MURDEROUS FLEEING FELON. To attempt to protect these innocents from the possibility of mass murder. One would certainly hope that upon hearing a crash and gunfire, civilians with self-interest might move and take cover or get down out of the way... not be a looky-loo and be in the way.
_________________ I defend the 2A. US Army Combat Veteran and Paratrooper: OIF Veteran. BSM and MSM recipient. NRA Lifetime. Entertainment purposes only. I'm a lawyer, but have not offered you legal advice.
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 9:23 pm |
|
 |
|
Ops
Site Supporter
Location: Piece/Clallam Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 Posts: 10661
|
you sure do like your bad cop stories. I think that's all you look for when your not doing anything.
You do know that he was killed for a reason, God has to make choices. instead of searching and posting these , go out to the gym and work that anger away
_________________ Yaki's - last journeyPromote a Growth Mindset. Don't let a fixed mindset not allow change for the better.
pow·er trip - noun - a self-aggrandizing quest for ever-increasing control over others.
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 9:33 pm |
|
 |
|
Sinus211
Site Moderator
Location: Marysville Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 Posts: 13843
Real Name: Mike
|
Powderman always hits the nail on the head.
Jagerbomber made a very good point about the group trying to police their own.
Madpick I completely understand your weariness of the "pile on" effect that you see happening, but I think sometimes it bounces you back in the other direction too far. I think there's some merit to both sides here.
Me, I think the officer responded to a difficult situation well and a tragedy ensued. I don't think the officer deserves any sort of punishment, and I believe there will be a wrongful death lawsuit against the city with a hefty settlement for the victim's family. It's a tragedy. And had an officer been killed not returning fire, that would be a tragedy too. "Bullet sponge" is not in the job description.
Tough situation, as they usually are. TW you can't crucify every cop. There's some bad situations, there's some bad people, there's some bad outcomes, and life is shitty sometimes. I don't think this was a result of trigger happy police.
_________________Licensed/Bonded/Insured Hardwood Floor Installer/Finisher http://www.hardwoodfloorsnw.com/
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 9:41 pm |
|
 |
|
gscott
Site Supporter
Location: Thurston Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2014 Posts: 669
Real Name: yup
|
Could things have ended differently if it was Tumwater Walmart? What if LA let more good guys have guns?
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 10:05 pm |
|
 |
|
Selador
Site Supporter
Location: Index Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 Posts: 12955
Real Name: Jeff
|
leadcounsel wrote: Your prior post set me the wrong way, thinking you were mal-aligning these cops. We're good.
For the record, I'm not defending the FL deputy in the school shooting. His acts were the opposite of heroic and he had a duty to intervene. He failed. I'd rather that cops attempt to intervene and maybe make and honest mistake (like in this case a errant bullet, or in the Kent case and accidental highway death) than to stand by and let the wolves prey on innocents. The former examples are honest accidents, the latter is deliberate cowardice and failure to stand up against tyranny.
I don't think there are many truly bad cops. Sure, there are bad apples in every walk of life. But cops to self-police, and ones that can't do it are in fact weeded out. I have high faith in the profession. Bravo! BTW: you ARE the best lawyer in this thread.  And I may argue with you sometimes, but even so, I agree with you much more than I don't. dan360 wrote: You don't get enough credit for your usage of prose.  We need a like button around here STAT! I googled "prose". I'm still lost. LOL MadPick wrote: ^ After watching that video and reading the story, I can't find fault with the officers' behavior and shooting.
So yeah, they fired into the doorway, and there was some risk with that of hitting an innocent person. (And it turns out they did.) But what if they had NOT fired at him, and let him get into the store? Is there a reasonable chance that he would have killed people inside, taken hostages, etc.? Hell yeah. In fact, he did take hostages.
This guy was a threat to the public, and had already proven that. I think the officers shooting into the doorway was a lower-risk tactic than letting him continue unmolested into the store.
Granted, it didn't really work out the right way in this case, but I'm comfortable that they judged the odds correctly even if they lost this particular bet. My name is Jeff, and I agree with this message. leadcounsel wrote: TechnoWeenie wrote: To the contrary, IMO. There were people visible near the entrance. Guns should not have been fired in that direction. To the contrary, that might have been the very reason to attempt to immediately stop the ARMED MURDEROUS FLEEING FELON. To attempt to protect these innocents from the possibility of mass murder. One would certainly hope that upon hearing a crash and gunfire, civilians with self-interest might move and take cover or get down out of the way... not be a looky-loo and be in the way. Agreed. TW, I'd liken this to someone in a school shooting situation. The perp had already shot at cops. Had already taken a hostage. The risk was to take a chance at hitting someone else yourself, or let him HAVE the chance to kill a lot of people.
_________________ -Jeff
How can I help you, and/or make you smile, today?
You are entitled to your opinion. You are not entitled to tell me what mine must be.
Do justice. Love mercy.
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ~ Richard P. Feynman
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 10:12 pm |
|
 |
|
NWGunner
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu May 2, 2013 Posts: 13412
Real Name: Steve
|
I guess everyone sees what they want to see. Madpick sees it as piling on TW, but yet, with as much grief as TW gets, he still posts it here. Why? Attention? Seems you would want to post in a more receptive place. And TW saying he doesn't look for it and just posts newsfeeds rings hollow; he actually has posts he's started, saying, "I know this was months ago, or last year..." We're those from current newsfeeds? He also says he posts good stuff, too. Well, something good for cop discipline happened locally, and was all over the news yesterday and last night, including in news feeds. And I waited to see if TW posted about it....and I waited, & waited....nothing. 2 SPD cops were fired after shooting at a vehicle trying to get away. This happened in May, and I remember TW being hell bent about this. I couldn't find the thread, or posts, but now that heads have rolled, he posts nothing about it. This is why folks say it's anti-cop bias. Apologies if this is piling on.... https://q13fox.com/2018/07/23/two-seatt ... tial-area/
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 10:28 pm |
|
 |
|
MadPick
Site Admin
Location: Renton, WA Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 Posts: 53102
Real Name: Steve
|
sinus211 wrote: Madpick I completely understand your weariness of the "pile on" effect that you see happening, but I think sometimes it bounces you back in the other direction too far. I think there's some merit to both sides here. NWGunner wrote: Madpick sees it as piling on TW Jeebus.... What exactly did I say to bring this on? (Hint: I didn't say jack shit. But yes, I agree with Massivedesign's comments, if that's what you're thinking of.)
_________________SteveBenefactor Life Member, National Rifle AssociationLife Member, Second Amendment FoundationPatriot & Life Member, Gun Owners of AmericaLife Member, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ArmsLegal Action Supporter, Firearms Policy CoalitionMember, NAGR/NFGRPlease support the organizations that support all of us.Leave it cleaner than you found it.
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 10:37 pm |
|
 |
|
NWGunner
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu May 2, 2013 Posts: 13412
Real Name: Steve
|
Oops, sorry Madpick I read Massive's post, and then read Sinus later, & just followed suit.....  Sorry..... 
|
| Tue Jul 24, 2018 10:51 pm |
|
 |
|
CQBgopher
Site Supporter
Location: WA/MT Joined: Thu Sep 6, 2012 Posts: 8438
|
.
Last edited by CQBgopher on Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Wed Jul 25, 2018 4:08 am |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|