 |
 |
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:27 pm |
|
All times are UTC - 8 hours |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Page 8 of 13 |
[ 191 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 13 Next |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
WH Press Pool - Callin out Bull.
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Site Supporter   Location: Apple Country! Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 Posts: 4578 Real Name: J 
|
AR15L wrote: Bottom line is NOBODY HERE likes Jimmy boy and we all want to see the shit kicked out of him.   I just prefer to see it in a way that isnt either stooping to "liberal snowflake" levels, and completely above board and beyond reproach. _________________ "Guns are dangerous." -Massivedesign |
| Tue Nov 13, 2018 10:56 am |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter Location: Apple Country! Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 Posts: 4578 Real Name: J
|
Quote: "FOX News supports CNN in its legal effort to regain its White House reporter's press credential. We intend to file an amicus brief with the U.S. District Court. Secret Service passes for working White House journalists should not be weaponized. While we don't condone the antagonistic tone by both the President and the press at recent media avails, we do support a free press, access and open exchanges for the American people," Wallace's statement read. The way things are done, are super important. _________________ "Guns are dangerous." -Massivedesign |
| Wed Nov 14, 2018 11:02 am |
|
|
|
 Location: Polson, MT Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 Posts: 32
|
It was a setup.
Why did POTUS call on Acosta? A guy he obviously hates. Because he was all pissed about life and wanted to start a fight that would be a nice distraction from the daily shenanigans. Sure, reporters can be assholes. That's their job sometimes. But this whole thing was Trumped up from the get go. |
| Wed Nov 14, 2018 11:57 am |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter  Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 Posts: 13486 Real Name: JP
|
Bobson Dugnutt wrote: It was a setup. Why did POTUS call on Acosta? A guy he obviously hates. Because he was all pissed about life and wanted to start a fight that would be a nice distraction from the daily shenanigans. Sure, reporters can be assholes. That's their job sometimes. But this whole thing was Trumped up from the get go.  _________________ Yes I Do Have A Beautiful Daughter.. I Also Have A Gun, A Shovel, & An Alibi |
| Wed Nov 14, 2018 12:23 pm |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter  Location: Lynnwood/Bothell Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 Posts: 8564 Real Name: Curtis
|
Bobson Dugnutt wrote: It was a setup. Why did POTUS call on Acosta? A guy he obviously hates. Because he was all pissed about life and wanted to start a fight that would be a nice distraction from the daily shenanigans. Sure, reporters can be assholes. That's their job sometimes. But this whole thing was Trumped up from the get go. |
| Wed Nov 14, 2018 12:34 pm |
|
|
|
|
Location: Polson, MT Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 Posts: 32
|
Does that mean that neither of you think it was a little odd for Trump to call on Acosta first, right out of the box? A guy who notoriously has been a pain in Trump's ass for quite some time.
I'm not that blind. I need reading glasses to read, but even a fool can SEE that it was planned. |
| Thu Nov 15, 2018 12:54 pm |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter  Location: Index Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 Posts: 12963 Real Name: Jeff
|
Bobson Dugnutt wrote: Does that mean that neither of you think it was a little odd for Trump to call on Acosta first, right out of the box? A guy who notoriously has been a pain in Trump's ass for quite some time. I'm not that blind. I need reading glasses to read, but even a fool can SEE that it was planned. You ever taken a bandaid off? Best to just rip that thing off right now, and get it over with. _________________ -Jeff How can I help you, and/or make you smile, today? You are entitled to your opinion. You are not entitled to tell me what mine must be. Do justice. Love mercy. “I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ~ Richard P. Feynman |
| Thu Nov 15, 2018 1:20 pm |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter  Location: N-Sno Joined: Thu Oct 3, 2013 Posts: 4015
|
Selador wrote: You ever taken a bandaid off? Best to just rip that thing off right now, and get it over with. This is my guess, too. If there were hints that Acosta planned to raise a fuss or be disruptive (chatter in the hallway, body language), it's much better to get into it straightaway so you can get back to business. Why let him interrupt others or turn the event into a circus? That only serves Acosta and no one else. _________________ "Hmmm. I've been looking for a way to serve the community that incorporates my violence." -- Leela |
| Thu Nov 15, 2018 1:38 pm |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter  Location: maple valley Joined: Mon May 6, 2013 Posts: 2575 Real Name: Earl
|
Selador wrote: Bobson Dugnutt wrote: Does that mean that neither of you think it was a little odd for Trump to call on Acosta first, right out of the box? A guy who notoriously has been a pain in Trump's ass for quite some time. I'm not that blind. I need reading glasses to read, but even a fool can SEE that it was planned. You ever taken a bandaid off? Best to just rip that thing off right now, and get it over with. I don't think so. Trump did not need to call on him at all. Trump did it on purpose to get a reaction exactly like this. This allows Trump to continue to attack MSM, and CNN in particular. He knows that this is exactly what a large percentage of his base wants. Trump was being tactical in his war against MSM is what I think. |
| Thu Nov 15, 2018 4:13 pm |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter  Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
Duke EB wrote: Selador wrote: Bobson Dugnutt wrote: Does that mean that neither of you think it was a little odd for Trump to call on Acosta first, right out of the box? A guy who notoriously has been a pain in Trump's ass for quite some time. I'm not that blind. I need reading glasses to read, but even a fool can SEE that it was planned. You ever taken a bandaid off? Best to just rip that thing off right now, and get it over with. I don't think so. Trump did not need to call on him at all. Trump did it on purpose to get a reaction exactly like this. This allows Trump to continue to attack MSM, and CNN in particular. He knows that this is exactly what a large percentage of his base wants. Trump was being tactical in his war against MSM is what I think. Victim blaming... That's a new one. Really too much to expect every press rep to behave themselves and not act like Acosta? What's the functional difference in banning Acosta versus never calling on him ever with the expectation that he'll always be rude? _________________ If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/ Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738 Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them" |
| Thu Nov 15, 2018 4:41 pm |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter Location: maple valley Joined: Mon May 6, 2013 Posts: 2575 Real Name: Earl
|
Alpine wrote: Duke EB wrote: Selador wrote: Bobson Dugnutt wrote: Does that mean that neither of you think it was a little odd for Trump to call on Acosta first, right out of the box? A guy who notoriously has been a pain in Trump's ass for quite some time. I'm not that blind. I need reading glasses to read, but even a fool can SEE that it was planned. You ever taken a bandaid off? Best to just rip that thing off right now, and get it over with. I don't think so. Trump did not need to call on him at all. Trump did it on purpose to get a reaction exactly like this. This allows Trump to continue to attack MSM, and CNN in particular. He knows that this is exactly what a large percentage of his base wants. Trump was being tactical in his war against MSM is what I think. Victim blaming... That's a new one. Really too much to expect every press rep to behave themselves and not act like Acosta? What's the functional difference in banning Acosta versus never calling on him ever with the expectation that he'll always be rude? Approval with the base. That's the difference. He knows confrontation with msm\cnn is a winning strategy with his base. |
| Thu Nov 15, 2018 4:45 pm |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
Or maybe we just wanted to get it over with because he knew it was eventually coming. How often do you or I have to deal with obnoxious jerks day after day in front of TV cameras?
_________________ If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/ Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738 Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them" |
| Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:26 am |
|
|
|
|
Location: Wyoming Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 Posts: 981
|
Well the Judge ruled to give Acosta his pass back on a temporary status. Mostly due to no Due Process in the pass being pulled in the first place.
|
| Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:28 am |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
Totally insane. These corporate media people shouldn't get special privileges.
Why doesn't every joe-boh blogger out there get a press pass? We need to end the special privileges these lib media people get. _________________ If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/ Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738 Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them" |
| Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:39 am |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter Location: maple valley Joined: Mon May 6, 2013 Posts: 2575 Real Name: Earl
|
Alpine wrote: Or maybe we just wanted to get it over with because he knew it was eventually coming. How often do you or I have to deal with obnoxious jerks day after day in front of TV cameras? I disagree. Trump is playing a bigger game than you think. This is tactics on his part, and acosta rose to the occasion. Leave the emotion behind and look at the bigger picture. |
| Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:45 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 8 of 13 |
[ 191 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 13 Next |
|
All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: MycroftHolmes, TechnoWeenie and 71 guests |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|