| Author |
Message |
|
TechnoWeenie
Site Supporter
Location: Nova Laboratories Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 Posts: 19173
Real Name: Johnny 5
|
Shooting occurs, security guard has one of the suspects at gunpoint, on the ground. CPD decides 'Who needs to ID their target?' And shoots and kills the security guard. PD is saying 'not our fault, he had a gun'... https://www.foxnews.com/us/cop-accidentally-kills-security-guard-at-bar-in-chicago-suburbs
_________________NO DISASSEMBLE!Thomas Paine wrote: "He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 12:23 pm |
|
 |
|
root
Site Supporter
Location: Apple Country! Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 Posts: 4575
Real Name: J
|
I was just about to make this post.
I will wait to see what the report says, but yeah. Start carrying cuffs so you can detain someone and safely put your gun back in its holster. Or try not "matching the suspect description".
Because it is up to YOU to ensure that the Police don't mistake you for someone else. They have no duty to ensure that you are not a bad guy, it boils down to you.
_________________ "Guns are dangerous." -Massivedesign
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 12:47 pm |
|
 |
|
golddigger14s
Site Supporter
Location: Faxon, OK Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 Posts: 18058
Real Name: Chuck
|
root wrote: I was just about to make this post.
I will wait to see what the report says, but yeah. Start carrying cuffs so you can detain someone and safely put your gun back in its holster. Or try not "matching the suspect description".
Because it is up to YOU to ensure that the Police don't mistake you for someone else. They have no duty to ensure that you are not a bad guy, it boils down to you. The problem is that if you are alone it would require you to holster the gun, and come in physical contact with the BG. If I was alone I would not want to be in contact with the BG, too many things can go wrong. Having a gun should not be an automatic shoot me scenario.
_________________ "The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." Thomas Jefferson "Evil often triumphs, but never conquers." Joseph Roux
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 1:15 pm |
|
 |
|
root
Site Supporter
Location: Apple Country! Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 Posts: 4575
Real Name: J
|
golddigger14s wrote: root wrote: I was just about to make this post.
I will wait to see what the report says, but yeah. Start carrying cuffs so you can detain someone and safely put your gun back in its holster. Or try not "matching the suspect description".
Because it is up to YOU to ensure that the Police don't mistake you for someone else. They have no duty to ensure that you are not a bad guy, it boils down to you. The problem is that if you are alone it would require you to holster the gun, and come in physical contact with the BG. If I was alone I would not want to be in contact with the BG, too many things can go wrong. Having a gun should not be an automatic shoot me scenario. No, it should not. However its officer safety and such. Or so it will go, that is.
_________________ "Guns are dangerous." -Massivedesign
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 1:18 pm |
|
 |
|
Mr. Q
Site Supporter
Location: S. Everett Joined: Thu May 2, 2013 Posts: 3088
|
so, moral of story is, shoot the bad guy(s), kill them, and re-holster gun. blend with crowd.
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 2:33 pm |
|
 |
|
Guntrader
In Memoriam
Location: Mukilteoish Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 Posts: 11589
|
When the police show up looking for a guy with a gun, you don't want to be the first guy they see holding one. Ya, he should have cuffed him.
Reminds me of the scene in LA Confidential where the LAPD Captain told Shotgun Ed "Hold your badge up so they know you are a police man"
_________________ NRA Endowment Member. How did they know my member was well endowed?
Last edited by Guntrader on Mon Nov 12, 2018 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 2:43 pm |
|
 |
|
Selador
Site Supporter
Location: Index Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 Posts: 12955
Real Name: Jeff
|
Mr. Q wrote: so, moral of story is, shoot the bad guy(s), kill them, and re-holster gun. blend with crowd. Win.
_________________ -Jeff
How can I help you, and/or make you smile, today?
You are entitled to your opinion. You are not entitled to tell me what mine must be.
Do justice. Love mercy.
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ~ Richard P. Feynman
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 2:46 pm |
|
 |
|
root
Site Supporter
Location: Apple Country! Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 Posts: 4575
Real Name: J
|
Mr. Q wrote: so, moral of story is, shoot the bad guy(s), kill them, and re-holster gun. blend with crowd. Then go away for life for Murder. Here is a radical idea. Cops should only shoot with a positive identification of the target.
_________________ "Guns are dangerous." -Massivedesign
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 3:36 pm |
|
 |
|
snozzberries
Site Supporter
Location: King County Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 Posts: 4012
|
This is why I voted to support the new use of force law.
The cops always say "he had a gun". I have a CPL. That doesn't mean you get to shoot me. Until a on-duty cop kills and off-duty cop, nothing will ever change.
The cop should be charged with murder.
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 4:04 pm |
|
 |
|
reginald_burrito
Site Supporter
Location: Not Seattle Joined: Wed Nov 2, 2016 Posts: 706
|
root wrote: Or try not "matching the suspect description". I see what you did there!
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 4:41 pm |
|
 |
|
Old Growth
Site Supporter
Location: Nisqually Valley Joined: Wed Oct 5, 2016 Posts: 4982
|
golddigger14s wrote: root wrote: I was just about to make this post.
I will wait to see what the report says, but yeah. Start carrying cuffs so you can detain someone and safely put your gun back in its holster. Or try not "matching the suspect description".
Because it is up to YOU to ensure that the Police don't mistake you for someone else. They have no duty to ensure that you are not a bad guy, it boils down to you. The problem is that if you are alone it would require you to holster the gun, and come in physical contact with the BG. If I was alone I would not want to be in contact with the BG, too many things can go wrong. Having a gun should not be an automatic shoot me scenario. Easy. Toss the suspect the cuffs and tell to the fawker to gettem on or your shooting his toes off two at a time. Of course if you really mean bizz, you put them on him by yourself while the perp is still out cold from the severe pistol whipping you gave him. ;)
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 4:46 pm |
|
 |
|
Old Growth
Site Supporter
Location: Nisqually Valley Joined: Wed Oct 5, 2016 Posts: 4982
|
Make sure you have a badge in a wallet to hold up when the popo show up so you look like one of the good guys.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 4:53 pm |
|
 |
|
Wetpaperbag
Site Supporter
Location: olympia Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 Posts: 3795
|
Word has it security guard is black...so there is that.
|
| Mon Nov 12, 2018 10:47 pm |
|
 |
|
Powderman
Location: WA State Joined: Fri Feb 8, 2013 Posts: 657
|
Aw, guys, come on....
1. First of all, the shooting. There is something missing from this picture--either that or the responding officer was grossly negligent in failing to identify the good guys. I cannot believe that a dispatcher would not let the responding officers know that there was armed security on scene.
2. What the security officer DID upon the arrival of the police is crucial. Did he immediately re-holster and raise his hands? Did he turn toward the responding officers with his weapon in hand?
3. I can NOT believe that someone actually posted advice like "shoot and blend into the crowd". Really?
4. Unless you have been trained in cuffing suspects, don't even TRY to apply restraints. WAY too many things can go wrong. And throwing them to the person probably won't work either. They will take off running, because they KNOW at that time that you are NOT acting in any official capacity.
_________________ I hunt the things that go bump in the night....
|
| Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:58 am |
|
 |
|
TechnoWeenie
Site Supporter
Location: Nova Laboratories Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 Posts: 19173
Real Name: Johnny 5
|
Powderman wrote: 2. What the security officer DID upon the arrival of the police is crucial. Did he immediately re-holster and raise his hands? . Way to move the goalpost. Since when is it the citizens responsibility to prove he's not a threat? Police have shot caged dogs for barking, and shot poodles jumping out of cars, and claimed they were threats... Cops have shot a guy on a motorcycle just for turning around in his seat, and a guy getting out of his car after a fender bender with a wallet and ID in his hand...shot a VICTIM that was held hostage... And even shot a robbery victim IN THE BACK then lied and said he ignored commands... When video proves no such thing happened. When you train cops that EVERYONE is a threat, guess what happens? 'Gotta go home at the end of the night'... At what expense? Innocent people getting killed? And they wonder why the community doesn't want them around? They got a textbook example right here.. I say shoot the methheads, let the cops be a clean up crew... Funny.. I've had more guns pointed at me by 'helpful gov't employees' than robbers... If he went to holster they'd say it was a 'furtive movement', if he didn't, they'd say he was a threat.. If he put his hands up with the gun in his hand they'd say he was raising the gun to shoot, and if he dropped the gun someone else could get it. No win. Fire the cops. Let the good people police themselves. Justice will prevail, one way or another. Hard to steal batteries from trucks when you got 6 bullets in you...
_________________NO DISASSEMBLE!Thomas Paine wrote: "He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
|
| Tue Nov 13, 2018 3:25 am |
|
 |
|