| Author |
Message |
|
joao01
Site Supporter
Location: Midwest Joined: Thu Oct 2, 2014 Posts: 8694
|
https://local12.com/question/the-questi ... 5103h1wCwcPoll has yes losing 48/52 as I post this. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
_________________Massivedesign wrote: I am thinking of a number somewhere between none of and your business.
|
| Sun Dec 02, 2018 1:21 pm |
|
 |
|
Alpine
Site Supporter
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
Voted
_________________If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them"
|
| Sun Dec 02, 2018 1:26 pm |
|
 |
|
GeekWithGuns
Site Supporter
Location: Round Rock, TX Joined: Thu Mar 5, 2015 Posts: 3898
Real Name: Dave
|
Just voted... Interesting how the voting breakdown goes... Don't trust anyone under 30, man...
_________________ There are dead horses yet to be slain.... - NWGunner
|
| Sun Dec 02, 2018 1:48 pm |
|
 |
|
golddigger14s
Site Supporter
Location: Faxon, OK Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 Posts: 18058
Real Name: Chuck
|
What an effed up web site.
_________________ "The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." Thomas Jefferson "Evil often triumphs, but never conquers." Joseph Roux
|
| Sun Dec 02, 2018 3:22 pm |
|
 |
|
OhShoot!
Site Supporter
Location: Bellingham Canada Joined: Thu Jan 3, 2013 Posts: 4995
Real Name: Josheewa
|
Yes, from sea to shining sea. voted.
_________________ It must be frustrating always being the smartest person in the room.-Jagerbomber35
Divided we fall.
|
| Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:48 pm |
|
 |
|
SporkBoy
Site Supporter
Location: Deckerville Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 Posts: 2964
Real Name: Rob
|
"Allowed"? The appropriate phrasing is "Not denied by tyrants". It's kind of like "shall not be infringed" - these 'long standing prohibitions' are blatantly unconstitutional.
_________________ “The Democrats are playing you for a political chump and if you vote for them, not only are you a chump, you are a traitor to your race.”-Malcolm X
|
| Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:17 pm |
|
 |
|
DM47
Site Supporter
Location: no longer in a van down by the river Joined: Mon Mar 6, 2017 Posts: 1684
|
SporkBoy wrote: "Allowed"? The appropriate phrasing is "Not denied by tyrants". It's kind of like "shall not be infringed" - these 'long standing prohibitions' are blatantly unconstitutional. This!! ^^^^^ Exactly! Such a BS setup it's not surprising.
|
| Sun Dec 02, 2018 7:03 pm |
|
 |
|
ironworker78
Site Supporter
Location: puyallup Joined: Sat Nov 3, 2012 Posts: 1151
|
You can vote multiple times, so get on it.
_________________ If your Dad doesn't have a beard you've got two Moms
|
| Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:56 pm |
|
 |
|
NWGunner
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu May 2, 2013 Posts: 13411
Real Name: Steve
|
Confused...
Why keep voting on a Question of The Day, from a Baltimore TV station from 4 or 5 days ago?
What am I missing?
|
| Sun Dec 02, 2018 10:04 pm |
|
 |
|
Guntrader
In Memoriam
Location: Mukilteoish Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 Posts: 11589
|
Law abiding citizens should be 'allowed' to carry a firearm everywhere they choose.
If more guns = more violence, you would expect to see hourly gunfights at a gun range.
_________________ NRA Endowment Member. How did they know my member was well endowed?
|
| Sun Dec 02, 2018 10:07 pm |
|
 |
|
NWGunner
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu May 2, 2013 Posts: 13411
Real Name: Steve
|
Guntrader wrote: Law abiding citizens should be 'allowed' to carry a firearm everywhere they choose.
If more guns = more violence, you would expect to see hourly gunfights at a gun range. Not sure if this is an attempt to respond to me, or not, but since it was on the heels of my post, I will go with maybe... My confusion isn't with the content, or the content of your post; my confusion is with why respond to a poll from a TV station that's a "daily" poll from 4 or 5 days ago, in a city & state with already more restrictive laws than ours? They've had 5 daily polls since then, and already have more restrictive laws. I was just responding to the 'get on their & vote a bunch'....as of it would have some influence. Knock yourself out, I was just saying I was confused, in case there was a relevance I was missing....
|
| Sun Dec 02, 2018 10:19 pm |
|
 |
|
deadshot2
Site Supporter
Location: Marysville, WA Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 Posts: 11570
Real Name: Mike
|
Guntrader wrote: Law abiding citizens should be 'allowed' to carry a firearm everywhere they choose.
And a lot of them do----------even if it might be viewed by some as illegal. If nobody sees it is it really there???
_________________ "I've learned from the Dog that an afternoon nap is a good thing"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"For he to-day that sheds his blood with me Shall be my brother" - William Shakespeare
|
| Mon Dec 03, 2018 2:54 pm |
|
 |
|
DGM33
Site Moderator
Location: Renton/Kent Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 Posts: 3615
Real Name: Jacy
|
NWGunner wrote: Guntrader wrote: Law abiding citizens should be 'allowed' to carry a firearm everywhere they choose.
If more guns = more violence, you would expect to see hourly gunfights at a gun range. Not sure if this is an attempt to respond to me, or not, but since it was on the heels of my post, I will go with maybe... My confusion isn't with the content, or the content of your post; my confusion is with why respond to a poll from a TV station that's a "daily" poll from 4 or 5 days ago, in a city & state with already more restrictive laws than ours? They've had 5 daily polls since then, and already have more restrictive laws. I was just responding to the 'get on their & vote a bunch'....as of it would have some influence. Knock yourself out, I was just saying I was confused, in case there was a relevance I was missing.... I agree that it's a useless endeavor, but I suppose it makes us feel better...? They honestly don't care what we think, though. They have a narrative and will push it no matter how we "vote."
|
| Mon Dec 03, 2018 3:46 pm |
|
 |
|