That's what I think it looks like.
Pvanderzee wrote:
That graph doesn't look like it was a single random number generator run. More like it was several runs done at different times.
Ex: 10,000 entries received by X date, 10,000 random numbers drawn between 1 and 10,000.
Another 10,000 entries received by Y date, another 10,000 random numbers drawn between 10,001 and 20,000
So, it has a degree of randomness, but the first batch of numbers generated all have lower numbers than the later batches of random numbers.
At least, that's what it looks like to me.