Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:40 am
Selador wrote:Massivedesign wrote:golddigger14s wrote::thumbsup2:
Yeah more people giving their rights up. We are in a not required to inform state. Don't ask don't tell.
What RIGHT did he give up?
The one he paid for?
If you tell someone about it, it's no longer 'concealed', even if they don't see it...
Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:42 am
Massivedesign wrote:Selador wrote:Massivedesign wrote:golddigger14s wrote::thumbsup2:
Yeah more people giving their rights up. We are in a not required to inform state. Don't ask don't tell.
What RIGHT did he give up?
The one he paid for?
If you tell someone about it, it's no longer 'concealed', even if they don't see it...
Concealed isn't a right, it's a "privilege".
Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:46 am
Selador wrote:One you paid for. Why give it up without being asked by the LEO?
Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:06 pm
Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:10 pm
Massivedesign wrote:Selador wrote:One you paid for. Why give it up without being asked by the LEO?
Oh, i get it. I share your same principal. I am just confused by Chuck saying that he gave up his rights by offering the CPL, and asked for clarification of exactly what RIGHT was given up.
Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:59 pm
The power of the state to tax with or without a vote is a non sequitur with regard to whether cops are or are not held to a higher standard than the public at large.
Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:45 pm
Powderman wrote:The power of the state to tax with or without a vote is a non sequitur with regard to whether cops are or are not held to a higher standard than the public at large.
Perhaps a bit of clarification....
This is what I meant...a goodly amount of the people (fortunately, none on this board I know of) are willing to vote for the privilege and opportunity of either: a. Giving the state MORE and MORE money, and b. Giving up their rights willingly.
An example is this: How many times has the State slipped in another tax here, another tax there? Look to the local governments as well. How in the HECK was Seattle able to pass a "soda tax" without a vote of the PEOPLE? By vote of the City Council. Who was voted into office by the citizens who live there.
Take a look at the "bullet tax" as well.
These are the same people who are on one hand willing to accept the opening of "safe injection sites", and who wail at alleged instances of "police brutality", yet are the FIRST ones to yell for the cops if something happens.
Does that make sense?
Thu Feb 22, 2018 7:35 pm
Thu Feb 22, 2018 9:43 pm
Thu Mar 01, 2018 4:25 am
golddigger14s wrote:The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.