And so it begins, the usual parade of anti-gun laws in this coming session.

http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/ ... z6x843R6C4

Apparently the Attorney General requested this action. Admittedly its only going into committee from here.... (I think)

Exactly. FUCK THEM> on Christmas eve, no less. Assholes.

God fucking dammit

How can they even do that on Christmas Eve?? Dirty, rotten low down Weasels...

I keep thinking that eventually these unconstitutional restrictions will hit too close to home with LE officers - you know, the people tasked with enforcing these laws (people who also tend to own the items in question for personal use) - and that there will be mass-non-compliance on their end as well. Is that wishful thinking?

Its time to quit playing defense and start playing offense and come up with our own laws . Like mandatory gun ownership . And let them spend there money on defense

They are exempt, see the bill.

The AG is a lawyer. Lawyers are supposed to follow state and federal law. They are not supposed to conspire or advocate to undermine it. The WA constitution and the US Constitution plainly state that gun rights shall not be impaired or infringed. The AG is also supposed to uphold the law, not undermine it.

Imagine if the AG were advocating to prevent blacks from eating at public restaurants, or Chinese people from voting, or gays from marrying... this is a continuing outrage against gun owners.

If you REALLY want to get off your *** and do something, consider filing a complaint against this lawyer.
If you wish to file a complaint against the AG and his law license for advocating the violation of state and federal civil rights, here is the simple and free procedure. It will take you 15 minutes.

https://www.wsba.org/for-the-public/con ... t-a-lawyer

The way I read it, they are only exempt "while acting within the scope of his or her duties". If that is an accurate reading, then they would NOT be exempt when they are off-duty. And that's what I'm getting at...when are the vast majority of officers going to stand up and say that this is wrong and they won't be a party to it?

Yeah, the verbiage is tricky. Like the part about the Grandfathered Mags. It would seem they are fine to use at a Licensed Gun range, but what about DNR Land?

"(3) In order to continue to possess a large capacity magazine
14 that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the
15 person possessing the large capacity magazine shall possess the large
16 capacity magazine only on property owned or immediately controlled by
17 the person, or while engaged in the legal use of the large capacity
18 magazine at a duly licensed firing range, or while engaged in a
19 lawful outdoor recreational activity such as hunting, or while
20 traveling to or from either of these locations for the purpose of
21 engaging in the legal use of the large capacity magazine, provided
22 that the large capacity magazine is stored unloaded and in a separate
locked container during transport."

This part especially catches my eye...who gets to decide that? Oh, that would be the LEO and Judge.

"lawful outdoor recreational activity such as Hunting"

"Yes Officer, i am hunting Rodents in the woods and that's why i have an AR and high Cap Mag....Seen any?"

Just reading all of that Shit gives me a Headache.

That would be kind of like representing yourself in Court, it won't end well for the the little guy. What we need is an Attorney to do this, maybe as a Class action representing the people of the State?

I will look into filing that complaint, but i know i will get stepped on as a Citizen for doing it. Probably just get scoffed at by the AG and the State.

I’m sure the NRA will jump in and save us. Shitlickers.

I like it!

Target shooting is a lawful outdoor recreational activity.

But fuck this. We're facing the endgame right here in Washington state.