WaGuns.org
https://www.waguns.org/

I-1639 LAWSUITS
https://www.waguns.org/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=92897
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Dave Workman [ Fri Jul 27, 2018 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:  I-1639 LAWSUITS

Gottlieb, NRA File Separate Challenges to I-1639 Validity

Nationally-recognized gun rights leader Alan Gottlieb, who heads two Washington State-based gun rights groups, on Friday filed one of two legal challenges to Initiative 1639, the latest gun control measure backed by a Seattle-based lobbying group

http://libertyparkpress.com/gottlieb-nr ... -validity/

Author:  leadcounsel [ Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: I-1639 LAWSUITS

Dave Workman wrote:
Gottlieb, NRA File Separate Challenges to I-1639 Validity

Nationally-recognized gun rights leader Alan Gottlieb, who heads two Washington State-based gun rights groups, on Friday filed one of two legal challenges to Initiative 1639, the latest gun control measure backed by a Seattle-based lobbying group

http://libertyparkpress.com/gottlieb-nr ... -validity/

:thumbsup2: :thumbsup2: :thumbsup2: :thumbsup2: :thumbsup2: :thumbsup2: :thumbsup2:

Author:  lionhrt [ Sat Jul 28, 2018 12:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: I-1639 LAWSUITS

:yes: :yes: :yes: :yes:

Author:  Pablo [ Sat Jul 28, 2018 3:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: I-1639 LAWSUITS

This lawsuit will fail in Washington's courts. Mark my words. She was not outside her powers to accept the petition and may have been borderline to reject. I think there are firmer grounds for the courts. What about the multiple subjects? The straight up infringement AND Impairment?

The state courts will not find in the favor SAF or NRA. We need to prepare for a proper battle. I think playing up health information privacy part will go a long way. Then the stupid complexity, inability to enforce, the overall invasion of privacy, and loss of rights for 18 year olds. We can also bring up the promises of 594 and absolute failure of that law.

We need to be ready for multiple lawsuits. Pony up! Join SAF and NRA and DONATE!!

Author:  Dave Workman [ Thu Aug 09, 2018 5:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: I-1639 LAWSUITS

Pablo wrote:
This lawsuit will fail in Washington's courts. Mark my words. She was not outside her powers to accept the petition and may have been borderline to reject. I think there are firmer grounds for the courts. What about the multiple subjects? The straight up infringement AND Impairment?

The state courts will not find in the favor SAF or NRA. We need to prepare for a proper battle. I think playing up health information privacy part will go a long way. Then the stupid complexity, inability to enforce, the overall invasion of privacy, and loss of rights for 18 year olds. We can also bring up the promises of 594 and absolute failure of that law.

We need to be ready for multiple lawsuits. Pony up! Join SAF and NRA and DONATE!!


Maybe, maybe not.
The lawsuit isn't challenging Kim's acceptance. The lawsuit is going after the petitions, which were NOT in compliance with statutory requirement to be "full and complete" and accurate.
Even the Walla Walla Union Bulletin editorialized that the initiative should be disqualified.
We'll see what happens, possibly on the 17th.

Author:  Pablo [ Thu Aug 09, 2018 5:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: I-1639 LAWSUITS

Dave Workman wrote:
Pablo wrote:
This lawsuit will fail in Washington's courts. Mark my words. She was not outside her powers to accept the petition and may have been borderline to reject. I think there are firmer grounds for the courts. What about the multiple subjects? The straight up infringement AND Impairment?

The state courts will not find in the favor SAF or NRA. We need to prepare for a proper battle. I think playing up health information privacy part will go a long way. Then the stupid complexity, inability to enforce, the overall invasion of privacy, and loss of rights for 18 year olds. We can also bring up the promises of 594 and absolute failure of that law.

We need to be ready for multiple lawsuits. Pony up! Join SAF and NRA and DONATE!!


Maybe, maybe not.
The lawsuit isn't challenging Kim's acceptance. The lawsuit is going after the petitions, which were NOT in compliance with statutory requirement to be "full and complete" and accurate.
Even the Walla Walla Union Bulletin editorialized that the initiative should be disqualified.
We'll see what happens, possibly on the 17th.


I hope you are correct. But our state courts have walked a single thread to support their leftist dogma.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/