Gun store Shooting Locations It is currently Wed Apr 17, 2024 10:23 pm



Rules WGO Chat Room Gear Rent Me Shield NRA SAF CCKRBA
Calendar




Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
 BATFE vs. Q - Honey Badger 
Author Message
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Kentucky
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015
Posts: 11087
Here's the letter from Q's attorney:

https://www.liveqordie.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Q-CD-Response-9-2-20-1.pdf

Quote:
The Letter notified Q that the Honey Badger pistol with arm brace is in fact a rifle with a
barrel under 16 inches in length and thus subject to the National Firearms Act. Q disagrees with
that conclusion and notes that both it, and thousands of its customers, have always regarded this
firearm to be a pistol based on its reading of the law and ATF classification letters in the public
domain. As addressed below, Q also believes ATF’s actions violate procedural norms and will
have a major impact on the firearms industry. Notwithstanding these concerns, Q greatly
appreciates the professionalism and courtesy exhibited by the Boston Field Division and intends
to fully cooperate with ATF to amicably resolve this matter. As such, we have submitted the two
requested firearms for evaluation and outlined a proposal for addressing the firearms already
owned by the public.

_________________
You may be right, I may be crazy, but it just may be a lunatic you're looking for


Thu Oct 08, 2020 6:35 am
Profile
Online
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: East Renton Plateau
Joined: Tue Jul 5, 2011
Posts: 914
It's not an SBA3, it's a "proprietary pistol brace" made by SB Tactical. It's collapsible and from the pics it appears to exceed the ATF's arbitrary "length of pull" limit. Measured precisely with my Mk1 mod0 eyeball

Sent from my SM-N976U using Tapatalk


Thu Oct 08, 2020 6:59 am
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: Somewhere in, WA
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014
Posts: 447
Real Name: RickSanchez
According to the owner of Q the ATF measured the LOP at an angle to get the out of spec length. So rogue ATF field agent stirring up shit for an October surprise? /tinfoil


Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:00 am
Profile
Site Supporter
User avatar
Site Supporter

Location: AZ
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018
Posts: 6793
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wash ... rol-pledge

Quote:
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has temporarily backed off criminalizing a type of gun used by 3-4 million people in the United States until after the presidential election, likely stoking the issue of gun control.

The New Hampshire maker of a popular styled AR-15 “pistol” today said that the ATF suspended its surprise decision made last week to outlaw the gun, called the “Honey Badger” pistol.


Quote:
“We believe this 60-day suspension is an effort to put manufacturers, distributors, and consumers at ease, and to postpone the issue past the presidential election in hopes that a new administration will take a different view,” said the company, adding, “using licensees as political pawns is unbecoming of a regulatory agency and ignoring the underlying evaluation in this letter is simply irresponsible. Q will not succumb to this level or irresponsibility. Therefore, without further clarification from ATF on their evaluation, we will not continue manufacturing the Honey Badger Pistol.

_________________
FPC member
GOA member
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.


Thu Oct 15, 2020 8:30 am
Profile
User avatar

Location: Puyallup
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018
Posts: 3063
It is obscene that "the election" would have any thing to do with this nonsense.

BATFE: the ultimate troll.

_________________
I'm a Morlock, in a land of Eloi...


Thu Oct 15, 2020 9:57 am
Profile
User avatar

Location: Washington State
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2020
Posts: 134


Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:53 pm
Profile
User avatar

Location: Lake Stevens
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018
Posts: 115
Real Name: Matthew Caldwell
The government has been arbitrarily telling us what kind of firearms we can own for far too long. Apparently, no one ever took into consideration the phrase "shall not be infringed" when questioning the Constitutionality of such laws & regulations.


Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:08 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum



Rules WGO Chat Room Gear Rent Me NRA SAF CCKRBA
Calendar


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.
[ Time : 3.171s | 16 Queries | GZIP : Off ]