glockgirl wrote:
To say that we should respect Mr. Copeland for "standing by" his words is something that I find absolutely abhorrent.
Jen..... you mis-understand my statement.
How many politicians now a days do you see folding to their convictions under peer pressure.
John Boehner for one, supposed to be conservative and when talking to a conservative group will be all in and pro everything conservative. Then when its important and his conservative peer group isn't watching he folds on and votes with his actions the totally opposite way.
Clearly from what he said Mr Copeland is a bigot. I'm not arguing that point. But when he was asked about the statement he said, "Yes that what I said and I'm not running from it"........
He took ownership of his words.
Most politicians would say, "Hey, I was misunderstood" or "I meant this.....it was taken out of context" or "No, I may have said something to that effect but I was talking about the Presidents dog". Usually done in a press conference while weeping pleading for his position in government.
Would it be better if he used all his political power and friends to hide or redirect his statement and keep his position? I think not.
I like to know who my friends and foes are. I'd also like to know the true feelings and views of my politicians.
It's good that he shared and took ownership without trying to cover it up.
Standing on ones position, abhorrent as it is, is an admirable quality. Taking ownership of ones actions is also admirable.
Neither quality found in today's politician.