Page 2 of 3
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 2:04 pm
by Soldier_Citizen
rayjax82 wrote:Someone messing with that much tannerite(or something else) in a remote forest at 6:30am strikes no one else as suspicious? Not to mention the fact that this guy lived in portland, and had to drive an hour+ to get to this place?
Call me crazy, but this doesn't pass the sniff test. There's something else going on here.
At 0630 yea kinda, but at the same time not really. I like to get up early and get to my shooting area shortly after sunrise to avoid all the idiots if I can.
And as for distance no, that doesn't suprise me. I was stationed in portland for a while, when I was, we drove an hour into the sticks in wa to shoot(currently 20 min from where I live), they recently shut down most of the shooting areas around it, and I have had to expand, he may know an area out that way to shoot, I do but I can't justify driving almost 2 hours one way. Unless you want to shoot at a range, you ain't finding to much within about 45 min to an hour from portland unless you know someone. Or go early and beat traffic
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:09 pm
by ANZAC
Some of the pictures show a big plastic milk container.... he may have been making his own.
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:14 pm
by Marine3%er
rayjax82 wrote:Someone messing with that much tannerite(or something else) in a remote forest at 6:30am strikes no one else as suspicious? Not to mention the fact that this guy lived in portland, and had to drive an hour+ to get to this place?
Call me crazy, but this doesn't pass the sniff test. There's something else going on here.
I don't know . I have blown up some large amounts and the most normal guy on this board .
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:24 pm
by Soldier_Citizen
Marine3%er wrote:rayjax82 wrote:Someone messing with that much tannerite(or something else) in a remote forest at 6:30am strikes no one else as suspicious? Not to mention the fact that this guy lived in portland, and had to drive an hour+ to get to this place?
Call me crazy, but this doesn't pass the sniff test. There's something else going on here.
I don't know . I have blown up some large amounts and the most normal guy on this board .
Haha saying your normal is like saying Richard Simmons is straight.
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:35 pm
by Kyverik
It looks like they've decided it was a suicide. Hell of a way to go.
http://www.oregonlive.com/clackamascoun ... _name.html
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:58 pm
by golddigger14s
They found pieces of a gun, so 594 would have prevented this.
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 6:09 pm
by Soldier_Citizen
Hmmm interesting
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 6:26 pm
by Massivedesign
Wow! Lone Suicide Bomber. That's a hell of a way to go. Assuming this really was a suicide, that event took a lot of planning and preparation.
Will be interesting to see why they think it's a suicide.. Must have found a note?
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 6:45 pm
by Soldier_Citizen
Massivedesign wrote:Wow! Lone Suicide Bomber. That's a hell of a way to go. Assuming this really was a suicide, that event took a lot of planning and preparation.
Will be interesting to see why they think it's a suicide.. Must have found a note?
Article didn't say
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 7:01 pm
by snozzberries
Marine3%er wrote:rayjax82 wrote:Someone messing with that much tannerite(or something else) in a remote forest at 6:30am strikes no one else as suspicious? Not to mention the fact that this guy lived in portland, and had to drive an hour+ to get to this place?
Call me crazy, but this doesn't pass the sniff test. There's something else going on here.
I don't know . I have blown up some large amounts and the most normal guy on this board .
You blew up the most normal guy on this board?
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 7:53 pm
by MadPick
So I guess the idea is that he mixed up a ridiculous amount of Tannerite (way more than that gallon jug, I'm sure), stood next to it, and then shot the jug?
That's a hell of a crater. That's NUTS.
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:51 pm
by BadKarma
My guess is 20 pounds.
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:09 pm
by CQBgopher
Was it actually Tannerite?
...or another knock-off piece of garbage "binary" explosive that actually isn't safe yet marketed as such?
...or something the idiot cooked up off recipes from YouTube, Google, Bing, Reddit, the "deep web" or somewherez elze.
...or was it something else, like....
Either way, Tannerite gets a bad f'ing rap from all the knock off junk out there that actually WILL set fires, WILL go off without high impact, and WILL burn when flame is introduced. Among many other things.
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:39 am
by snozzberries
So..speaking of tannerite. Anybody know where you can buy some?
Re: Countdown to proposals requiring BGCs on tannerite in 3.
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:12 am
by Guns4Liberty
snozzberries wrote:So..speaking of tannerite. Anybody know where you can buy some?
http://bit.ly/19N0Cmj