Fri Apr 03, 2015 9:03 am
Fri Apr 03, 2015 9:50 am
kf7mjf wrote:There was no debating of the facts of the case, but the fallacy of insisting that a particular generation was the high water mark of certain largely indefinable traits detracts from the achievements of that generation, and demeans it by using it to create a false set of standards to further an agenda. There is a lot to focus on, trying to promote an ideological agenda is disgusting.
Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:06 am
Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:29 am
RENCORP wrote:<snip>I am sick and tired of just the negative being the topic of discussion when it comes to the USA.</snip>
Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:37 am
kf7mjf wrote:Try again Rene. You are putting words in my mouth that weren't there. To hold up the success of the Doolittle Raid to undermine the people who came later demeans the Raiders and all the greatness that came after.
You picked a high water point of military action that will likely never be duplicated and used it to claim that which came after is inferior, weak and incapable of duplicating the past. In other words, you used the heroism of WWII to demean what came after. And that is insulting to the soldiers of WWII and to those who came after.
Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:41 am
Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:43 am
Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:00 am
kf7mjf wrote:Your title is "When men were men" which denotes a past tense, as if "men" no longer exist.
Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:14 am
and
Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:19 pm
kf7mjf wrote:Your title is "When men were men" which denotes a past tense, as if "men" no longer exist.
Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:58 pm
Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:02 pm
Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:08 pm
kf7mjf wrote:unsourced click bait ripped off from a CNN op ed?
Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:17 pm
Old Jim wrote:kf7mjf wrote:unsourced click bait ripped off from a CNN op ed?
C'mon Steve, you made your point, do not belabor it. Give it a rest.
Fri Apr 03, 2015 2:22 pm