Sun Apr 12, 2015 8:13 pm
Sun Apr 12, 2015 8:15 pm
rstrobel wrote:Putin has already made his opinion of Hillary very clear. He thinks she is weak.
She will likely win and then be re-elected. We will be stuck with her until 2025.
Sun Apr 12, 2015 8:28 pm
WaJim wrote:Positive side...?
Just one positive.
If she wins Putin wont screw with her.
Unlike O'Barry, Hillarry a mean bitch.
She'll be on top when theres screwing to be done.
Sun Apr 12, 2015 9:31 pm
Sun Apr 12, 2015 10:07 pm
And a CNN contributor later claimed that the #Hillary2016 hashtag only appeared on the list after her the panicking campaign consultants spending megabucks to make it trend. And they still couldn’t top the anti-Hillary topic.
Sun Apr 12, 2015 10:21 pm
CurtisLemansky wrote:WaJim wrote:Positive side...?
Just one positive.
If she wins Putin wont screw with her.
Unlike O'Barry, Hillarry a mean bitch.
She'll be on top when theres screwing to be done.
Like in Benghazi?
Sent from my UAV using Disposition Matrix 2.0
Sun Apr 12, 2015 10:45 pm
Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:02 am
WaJim wrote:I'd be willing to bet if you ask 25 people not on here what Benghazi is or was 2/3rds of them don't have a friggen clue what happened or that she was involved and half of them have never heard the word.
Mon Apr 13, 2015 7:44 am
Mon Apr 13, 2015 11:32 am
DocNugent wrote:WaJim wrote:I'd be willing to bet if you ask 25 people not on here what Benghazi is or was 2/3rds of them don't have a friggen clue what happened or that she was involved and half of them have never heard the word.
Some of us remember him:
Mon Apr 13, 2015 8:46 pm
Mon Apr 13, 2015 10:47 pm
Yes, congress voting on laws is just as stupidly conceived as voters endorsing the congress people. Nobody read the patriot act before signing it. On the other hand, everything in politics is planned two years in advance. Boxer's chief aide for 12 years John Hess told me that. By the time it's being publicized and voted on, the players have their pieces positioned.
That's why it's hilarious/tragic that people talk about elections like they as voters have something to do with outcomes. You don't. Prof of this is the popular vote in 2000 going fully to Gore, because people knew shrub was a tool. A flunkie. Very few jack and Jill's wanted a Bush v.2, but that's what we got.
Clinton v.2 is virtually assured as she's the counter balance (perception and policy wise) to a heartland full of disenchanted conservatives of all stripes. The well meaning "freedom" folks will be drawn to Paul or write in Frank Zappa, as I do each election. You can't " vote the bastards out" when they are all bastards.
The whole show is ostensibly to flood the fake debate space with softball scandal and tangential relevance. Chelsea Clinton is going to ooze a layer of protective slime over her mom and pull so many young female votes it will break participatin records for sure. Please let me be wrong. Please let me be wrong...
Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:29 am
Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:46 am
DSynger wrote:I'm concerned who is going to run against Hillary for the Democrats... She isn't for the middle of the road Democrat, you either love her or hate her. All the DNC has to do is plop someone that is more moderate than Hillary into the primaries. That person will probably get the nomination. Unless, they just want to go full retard and bet it all...
Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:53 am
cycle61 wrote:.
The whole show is ostensibly to flood the fake debate space with softball scandal and tangential relevance. Chelsea Clinton is going to ooze a layer of protective slime over her mom and pull so many young female votes it will break participatin records for sure. Please let me be wrong. Please let me be wrong...