|
|
 |
 |
It is currently Sat Feb 08, 2025 6:37 am
|
2017-2018 NFL Trash Talk Thread
| Author |
Message |
|
Mediumrarechicken
Location: Puyallup Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 Posts: 9063
Real Name: Richard Fitzwelliner
|
L_O_G wrote: leadcounsel wrote: With the rules of the 70s or 80s in place, I'd say the 1984/85 Bears or the 1984 or 1989 '49ers or the 1972 Dolphins (no real super stars but the only undefeated team in the history of the league), or the 1986 or 1990 NY Giants, or the 83 Redskins would take any team today, magically in their prime and on the same playing field of course.
Completely disagree. Penalties and rough play are one thing, but the players of today are bigger, stronger, faster and comparing their athleticism to one another would be like comparing Apples to Beans. Same could be said of any pro sports teams comparing current ones to past. The equipment is better, they are better athletes, and they dedicate their life to it. Back in the day the players played as a part time gig, these days its pretty much year round. Side note: BO Jackson was my favorite players as a kid, and I was actually at the Kingdome when he ran over the Boz. He ran a 4.12 40 in college, but it was hand timed and deemed unofficial. The old players had way more fat too. Boz got ran over because he was likely hungover. There was also only a 20 lb difference between them. Look at how many times marshawn had 5 guys trying to stop him and the whole stack was still moving forward. Marshawn would also stutter step the old guys and they would all be falling on the ground as he blew past them. Current guys have way more muscle mass and every muscle strand is stronger too.
_________________ If she sits on your face and you can still hear, SHE'S NOT FAT.
I'm going to type out 3 paragraphs and wax eloquently about a similar story in my life. Pm me if you figured it out.
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:27 am |
|
 |
|
L_O_G
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 Posts: 13515
Real Name: JP
|
MadPick wrote: WTF, 116%??
That makes all of those numbers suspect, in my book. Can we deduct at least 16 from all of the numbers? They sell standing room only tickets from time to time. If you don't want to count those, then I guess that's Boeing math. 
_________________ Yes I Do Have A Beautiful Daughter.. I Also Have A Gun, A Shovel, & An Alibi
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:30 am |
|
 |
|
L_O_G
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 Posts: 13515
Real Name: JP
|
From a Giants forum: http://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/in ... ead=558953Family has had season tickets since 1948. I have attended virtually all home games since the early 1960s. Something took place today I don't ever recall happening. With about 5 minutes left on the game clock, and any chance at a Giants victory gone, the Seattle fans simply took over the entire stadium. The chant was very loud and came from every corner of the stadium. SEA followed by others shouting HAWKS. On and on it went. Here we are in our home stadium, and the visiting teams fans have taken over the stadium. Every Giants fan still at the game had to listen to it. Every Giants player and coach had to listen to it. Every Giants Front Office staff and owners had to listen to it. Though it was 5 minutes on the gameclock, the chants went on for about 15-20 minutes of actual time before the game clock reached zero. It was embarrassing. It was humbling. It was gut wrenching. It hurt. It really hurt. 
_________________ Yes I Do Have A Beautiful Daughter.. I Also Have A Gun, A Shovel, & An Alibi
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:32 am |
|
 |
|
NWGunner
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu May 2, 2013 Posts: 13416
Real Name: Steve
|
L_O_G wrote: MadPick wrote: WTF, 116%??
That makes all of those numbers suspect, in my book. Can we deduct at least 16 from all of the numbers? They sell standing room only tickets from time to time. If you don't want to count those, then I guess that's Boeing math.  Plus, all new stadiums have a lot of suites. A lot of those can bring in more people than the fire Marshall says they're suppose to I've been in a suite for 20 that had 35 people in it before.
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:35 am |
|
 |
|
Massivedesign
Site Admin
Location: Olympia, WA Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 Posts: 38379
Real Name: Dan
|
L_O_G wrote: The chant was very loud and came from every corner of the stadium. SEA followed by others shouting HAWKS.
I heard it on the TV.. It was AWESOME. I also loved when you could hear LUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKKKEEEEEEEE, whenever he caught the ball. Towards the end of the game, it looked like a lot of the Giants fans had left the stadium, lots of empty seats, but lots of 12's remained to the end.
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 7:45 am |
|
 |
|
edogg
Site Supporter
Location: Central FL Joined: Sun Apr 7, 2013 Posts: 3207
|
L_O_G wrote: edogg wrote: Seems people aren’t showing up to the games anymore...as I understand it, even the lousy teams typically fill the stadium. Seahawks tickets have always been a hot commodity as long as I can remember. Even in the years where an 8-8 record was a good season for them. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10 ... -7-photos/Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Funny thing about that article is that they posted pics of the stands from games where shit teams were playing. Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Colts, Bears etc.. All of those teams wont make the playoffs. That crossed my mind too. But remember when the Seahawks sucked back in the 80’s/90’s every game was sold out? I think that’s not unusual. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:08 pm |
|
 |
|
L_O_G
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 Posts: 13515
Real Name: JP
|
Keep in mind back in the 80's/90's the NFL was not the monster it is now, so tickets, parking, food & beer were much more affordable.
_________________ Yes I Do Have A Beautiful Daughter.. I Also Have A Gun, A Shovel, & An Alibi
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:15 pm |
|
 |
|
Jonathan Brown
Site Supporter
Location: SnoCo Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 2357
|
L_O_G wrote: Keep in mind back in the 80's/90's the NFL was not the monster it is now, so tickets, parking, food & beer were much more affordable. I used to be able to go to a game at the Kingdome, and spend less than 30 bucks on parking, beer and food. Not counting the price of tickets, but they were way cheaper too.
_________________ "The faster you shoot, the less shot you will get."
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:20 pm |
|
 |
|
leadcounsel
Site Supporter
Location: Can't say Joined: Sun Sep 7, 2014 Posts: 8131
|
Mediumrarechicken wrote: L_O_G wrote: leadcounsel wrote: With the rules of the 70s or 80s in place, I'd say the 1984/85 Bears or the 1984 or 1989 '49ers or the 1972 Dolphins (no real super stars but the only undefeated team in the history of the league), or the 1986 or 1990 NY Giants, or the 83 Redskins would take any team today, magically in their prime and on the same playing field of course.
Completely disagree. Penalties and rough play are one thing, but the players of today are bigger, stronger, faster and comparing their athleticism to one another would be like comparing Apples to Beans. Same could be said of any pro sports teams comparing current ones to past. The equipment is better, they are better athletes, and they dedicate their life to it. Back in the day the players played as a part time gig, these days its pretty much year round. Side note: BO Jackson was my favorite players as a kid, and I was actually at the Kingdome when he ran over the Boz. He ran a 4.12 40 in college, but it was hand timed and deemed unofficial. The old players had way more fat too. Boz got ran over because he was likely hungover. There was also only a 20 lb difference between them. Look at how many times marshawn had 5 guys trying to stop him and the whole stack was still moving forward. Marshawn would also stutter step the old guys and they would all be falling on the ground as he blew past them. Current guys have way more muscle mass and every muscle strand is stronger too. It's not necessarily just size and numbers and stats. It's about ability and athleticism. The best in various positions have unlikely sizes. It's skill and pure ability that counts. Yes, speed has gotten faster by a few fractions of a second across the board and in all positions. It does matter, but it's not the be-all determination. If it was, the "best" in all positions would be the modern era, but that's not the case in most/or any position. So while 4.3 speeds in some positions are more common, they aren't "better" athletes. And the historic fastest NFL players included many players, including Bob Hayes, from decades ago. None of the top running backs are from the modern era. All are prior to 2000. Eric Dickerson. Held the all-time rushing leader, and IIRC is #3 on the list. 6'3" and 220 lbs. 40 yard dash 4.3 sec. IIRC Emmitt Smith. All time rushing leader . Listed as 5'10, and 216lbs. Walter Payton - 2nd All time rushing leader and one of the top 5 backs of all time. 5'10" and 200 lbs Barry Sanders - maybe the best back of all time. 5'8" and 200. 40 yards at 4.37 sec. Tony Dorsett - 5'11", 192. 4.3 sec 40 yard dash. Among the best backs ever. Longest rushing play from scrimmage I believe, at 99 yards TD. Bo Jackson, 6'1" 227lbs. 4.13 40 yard dash. Any of the above backs would continue to be the best in today's league. Regardless of their size. Marshan Lynch - above average back who was traded. 5'11" and 215. 40 yard speed 4.45 sec. The fact is no back today could compare to the short list above, all pre-2000. Lynch wasn't even impressive by 1990s standards. Jackson and Dickerson and Dorsett were bigger and faster. Payton and Smith were a lot tougher. And Payton and Sanders had quicker/better feet/agility. If you think Lynch had good runs, go watch Payton run over 4 men and carry 6 more to the end zone. Or Dorsett blaze 99 yards. Or Bo Jackson blaze down the sidelines. Or Sanders dance through defenders. The size of players has not significantly changed in a few decades at most positions other than QB. The speeds have improved a little but not drastically. And there were plenty of blazers in those eras. A fraction of a second is not drastic enough to make a difference. Average lineman in the 1980s was 6'4" and 272 lbs. In the 1990s it was 6'4" and 300. Now it's 6'4" and 310. I'm unconvinced that a 3-10% difference in weight is compelling in a lineman.
_________________ I defend the 2A. US Army Combat Veteran and Paratrooper: OIF Veteran. BSM and MSM recipient. NRA Lifetime. Entertainment purposes only. I'm a lawyer, but have not offered you legal advice.
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:16 pm |
|
 |
|
L_O_G
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 Posts: 13515
Real Name: JP
|
Being a big guy is one thing, but being a big guy and being athletic is a completely different scenario. If you put Walter Payton his prime on an NFL roster today, he would not put up the numbers he did. The game has changed and gone away from run heavy offenses to know more spread the defense out and throw it 30+ times a game.
_________________ Yes I Do Have A Beautiful Daughter.. I Also Have A Gun, A Shovel, & An Alibi
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:25 pm |
|
 |
|
L_O_G
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 Posts: 13515
Real Name: JP
|
Jonathan Brown wrote: L_O_G wrote: Keep in mind back in the 80's/90's the NFL was not the monster it is now, so tickets, parking, food & beer were much more affordable. I used to be able to go to a game at the Kingdome, and spend less than 30 bucks on parking, beer and food. Not counting the price of tickets, but they were way cheaper too. Yup I remember my Mom paying $8 to park right across from the Kingdome. Now a parking spot that close is $50+
_________________ Yes I Do Have A Beautiful Daughter.. I Also Have A Gun, A Shovel, & An Alibi
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:26 pm |
|
 |
|
Jonathan Brown
Site Supporter
Location: SnoCo Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 2357
|
L_O_G wrote: Jonathan Brown wrote: L_O_G wrote: Keep in mind back in the 80's/90's the NFL was not the monster it is now, so tickets, parking, food & beer were much more affordable. I used to be able to go to a game at the Kingdome, and spend less than 30 bucks on parking, beer and food. Not counting the price of tickets, but they were way cheaper too. Yup I remember my Mom paying $8 to park right across from the Kingdome. Now a parking spot that close is $50+ And Joe Diamond doesn't own the lots any more. It's all some fucking arab looking motherfuckers.
_________________ "The faster you shoot, the less shot you will get."
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:39 pm |
|
 |
|
L_O_G
Site Supporter
Location: South Seattle Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 Posts: 13515
Real Name: JP
|
Yup. I went to a game last year (happened at a M's game also) and went to pay the guy and he said they don't take cash, only cards then proceeded to take his Iphone out with a scanner on top. Um no mazafaka, cash only for you.
I ended up parking down behind Showgirls. :)
_________________ Yes I Do Have A Beautiful Daughter.. I Also Have A Gun, A Shovel, & An Alibi
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:41 pm |
|
 |
|
Jonathan Brown
Site Supporter
Location: SnoCo Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 Posts: 2357
|
L_O_G wrote: Yup. I went to a game last year (happened at a M's game also) and went to pay the guy and he said they don't take cash, only cards then proceeded to take his Iphone out with a scanner on top. Um no mazafaka, cash only for you.
I ended up parking down behind Showgirls. :) Life was so much better when The Mob ran everything.
_________________ "The faster you shoot, the less shot you will get."
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:51 pm |
|
 |
|
bigzdawg
Site Supporter
Location: East of Lake Washington Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 Posts: 1864
|
leadcounsel wrote: Mediumrarechicken wrote: L_O_G wrote: leadcounsel wrote: With the rules of the 70s or 80s in place, I'd say the 1984/85 Bears or the 1984 or 1989 '49ers or the 1972 Dolphins (no real super stars but the only undefeated team in the history of the league), or the 1986 or 1990 NY Giants, or the 83 Redskins would take any team today, magically in their prime and on the same playing field of course.
Completely disagree. Penalties and rough play are one thing, but the players of today are bigger, stronger, faster and comparing their athleticism to one another would be like comparing Apples to Beans. Same could be said of any pro sports teams comparing current ones to past. The equipment is better, they are better athletes, and they dedicate their life to it. Back in the day the players played as a part time gig, these days its pretty much year round. Side note: BO Jackson was my favorite players as a kid, and I was actually at the Kingdome when he ran over the Boz. He ran a 4.12 40 in college, but it was hand timed and deemed unofficial. The old players had way more fat too. Boz got ran over because he was likely hungover. There was also only a 20 lb difference between them. Look at how many times marshawn had 5 guys trying to stop him and the whole stack was still moving forward. Marshawn would also stutter step the old guys and they would all be falling on the ground as he blew past them. Current guys have way more muscle mass and every muscle strand is stronger too. It's not necessarily just size and numbers and stats. It's about ability and athleticism. The best in various positions have unlikely sizes. It's skill and pure ability that counts. Yes, speed has gotten faster by a few fractions of a second across the board and in all positions. It does matter, but it's not the be-all determination. If it was, the "best" in all positions would be the modern era, but that's not the case in most/or any position. So while 4.3 speeds in some positions are more common, they aren't "better" athletes. And the historic fastest NFL players included many players, including Bob Hayes, from decades ago. None of the top running backs are from the modern era. All are prior to 2000. Eric Dickerson. Held the all-time rushing leader, and IIRC is #3 on the list. 6'3" and 220 lbs. 40 yard dash 4.3 sec. IIRC Emmitt Smith. All time rushing leader . Listed as 5'10, and 216lbs. Walter Payton - 2nd All time rushing leader and one of the top 5 backs of all time. 5'10" and 200 lbs Barry Sanders - maybe the best back of all time. 5'8" and 200. 40 yards at 4.37 sec. Tony Dorsett - 5'11", 192. 4.3 sec 40 yard dash. Among the best backs ever. Longest rushing play from scrimmage I believe, at 99 yards TD. Bo Jackson, 6'1" 227lbs. 4.13 40 yard dash. Any of the above backs would continue to be the best in today's league. Regardless of their size. Marshan Lynch - above average back who was traded. 5'11" and 215. 40 yard speed 4.45 sec. The fact is no back today could compare to the short list above, all pre-2000. Lynch wasn't even impressive by 1990s standards. Jackson and Dickerson and Dorsett were bigger and faster. Payton and Smith were a lot tougher. And Payton and Sanders had quicker/better feet/agility. If you think Lynch had good runs, go watch Payton run over 4 men and carry 6 more to the end zone. Or Dorsett blaze 99 yards. Or Bo Jackson blaze down the sidelines. Or Sanders dance through defenders. The size of players has not significantly changed in a few decades at most positions other than QB. The speeds have improved a little but not drastically. And there were plenty of blazers in those eras. A fraction of a second is not drastic enough to make a difference. Average lineman in the 1980s was 6'4" and 272 lbs. In the 1990s it was 6'4" and 300. Now it's 6'4" and 310. I'm unconvinced that a 3-10% difference in weight is compelling in a lineman. LC, I love you man, but have to disagree with you on this topic. You have cherry picked the best from nearly two generations. The reality is the NFL, any pro sport for that matter, has become a 12 month job whereas before it was a 6-8 month job. They start training year around as high schoolers many times in facilities that coaches only dreamed about a generation ago. These athletes get faster, stronger, bigger every year. That is the trend and it hasn't changed in 20 years. Pro athletes are better because that is all they do for their entire lives. There is no offseason. Perhaps most superstars could still perform will today. But take the averages of all linemen, their size, weight, and speed, and I would bet an Andrew Jackson they are all improved from the previous generation. The DB's are both faster and bigger. The game continues to change and improve. Year around competition is the reason, as well as better nutritionists, doctors, personal trainers, etc. Most that make the news today are ungrateful bastards, but that is another discussion.
|
| Mon Oct 23, 2017 3:08 pm |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|