 |
 |
It is currently Sat Feb 08, 2025 6:26 am |
|
All times are UTC - 8 hours |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Page 2 of 2 |
[ 19 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2 |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Another SCOTUS judge says guns are not an individual right
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
In Memoriam   Joined: Wed Mar 6, 2013 Posts: 12018 
|
snozzberries wrote: People have the right to protect themselves, to have firearms. This is a right that isn't given or bestowed by anybody or anything. It is inalienable. The 2nd amendment doesn't grant you the right to have guns. The 2nd Amendment says, this right you already have, cannot be infringed upon by the government.  Perfect. |
| Fri Aug 25, 2017 11:45 am |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter  Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 Posts: 7649
|
Tough to make it through this, it's so saccharine-sweet with Rose fawning all over Ginsburg but it does give some insight into this twisted justice's coming rulings for this year.
https://livestream.com/92Y/events/77203 ... /163404670 Right out of the bag she claims she isn't going to pre-judge cases, but then immediately announces her stances on district-drawing, religious liberty, etc. She also said that Trump's election was "sexist." Rose tried to provoke her into denouncing Trump's wall but I think she caught it and avoided making a statement because she didn't want to be forced to recuse herself later. He also tried to provoke her into commenting on Trump's travel EO. Constant comments about her health and encouraging her not to retire because of the "harm" Trump would cause by filling more SCOTUS seats. The audience tried provoking her into commenting on the Senate not confirming Merrick Garland. The dialogue is pretty awkward and uncomfortable, with Rose almost treating her like a beloved grandma who has dementia or Alzheimers. He throws tons of softballs and compliments to her and at times is concerned she is unable to understand him. This interview underscores why she should retire or be removed ASAP. For context remember she came out strongly against the 2nd Amendment with her comments on the Heller case: http://www.guns.com/2016/07/12/heller-a ... sion-says/ _________________ If you vote for Biden you are voting to be murdered when he sends Beto to come take your "semi automatic assault weapon" (any semi auto). If you have family or friends voting for Biden show them this and ask if they are willing to vote for your murder or maybe even their own if they are gun owners or live with any. https://nypost.com/2020/03/03/joe-biden ... n-control/ Quote: “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him (Beto),” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re (Beto) going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re (Beto) going to be the one who leads this effort.” https://www.newsweek.com/beto-orourke-g ... ns-1465738 Quote: [Beto O'Rourke Suggests Police Would 'Visit' Homes To Implement Proposed Assault Weapons Ban] "In that case, I think that there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm... ..."If someone does not turn in an AR-15 or an AK-47, one of these weapons of war...then that weapon will be taken from them" |
| Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:31 am |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter  Location: Deckerville Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 Posts: 2964 Real Name: Rob
|
SCOTUS has never held that position.
Some like to twist Miller and claim collective but even that is a huge fabrication. _________________ “The Democrats are playing you for a political chump and if you vote for them, not only are you a chump, you are a traitor to your race.”-Malcolm X |
| Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:33 pm |
|
|
|
|
Site Supporter Location: East of Lake Washington Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 Posts: 1864
|
Alpine wrote: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tG9lPpTgQts In an interview Breyer stated Quote: [Breyer] said it was his position that the Founders were talking about a collective right, “which is not the right of an individual to keep a gun next to his bed.” Yes, this wanna-be Constitutional "scholar" is pretending to be channeling James Madison despite Federalist 46 flatly contradicting him. In any case, let this be another reminder that we have two sitting judges, Ginsburg and Breyer commenting now that Heller was wrongly decided and both stating that would change it if they could get another gun case before the court and if they had the majority. Ginsburg was more explicit about this when she thought that Hillary was going to win but don't mistake Breyer's obvious innuendo. If Hillary had won it would have been the end of private gun ownership in America. Sotomayor voted against McDonald which was the attempt of the courts' libs to flip Heller or at least nerf it. As it is Breyer is the 3rd oldest judge behind Ginsburg and Kennedy, so we will likely have to continue putting up with his assaults on civil rights for another few years. Liberty hangs by a thread, and whatever your misgivings about Trump he saved us from disarmament. His first SCOTUS judge, Gorsuch, already attempted to overturn an AWB. The result of IVY league closed mindedness and singular thinking. IVY league schools should be nationalized and their endowments disbursed. |
| Wed Sep 27, 2017 2:29 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 2 |
[ 19 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2 |
|
All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: foggood11, steble01 and 46 guests |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|