Wa supreme court sentences teen to child porno

[os2firefox]

In what seems to be a crazy use of logic, the Washington Supreme Court has upheld a conviction of a teen for sending dick pics to a 22 year old using a law that is ironically meant to protect minors.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/201 ... nographer/

[TINCANBANDIT]

I thought the age of consent in WA is 16, so if he is allowed to have relations with a woman of 22, why can't he send pictures?

[Duke EB]

Age of consent is 16, but that is for engaging in sex. I don't think sexting falls under that law.

[dreadi]

I didn't know you could be sentenced to child pornography. What a sick judge!

[Ops]

Don't send your dick pics to begin with.

its about time, maybe these kids will learn

[os2firefox]

Don't send your dick pics to begin with.

its about time, maybe these kids will learn

While generally good advice, the punishment does not fit the spirit of the law or the actions of a teen.

[Selador]

I didn't know you could be sentenced to child pornography. What a sick judge!

I know, right?

Imagine that, sentenced to keep doing what you are accused of...

[bigzdawg]

Don't send your dick pics to begin with.

its about time, maybe these kids will learn

Aren't public schools teaching a class in this important subject?