This guy makes me laugh so hard with his answers but he’s also very professional with the way he speaks.

Interviewer: why are you so committed to give people access to these files?
Cody: it’s a matter of principle, I know it’s absurd for some of you to fight for your principles.


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cody-wilso ... ed-online/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He ran mental circles around those buffoons. Too bad his points went right over their simple heads.

The US Copyright Office says that providing materials to someone else for further distribution counts as publishing.

Just an observation.

Definitely.






He is hitting home runs. The pitches are slow and over the plate. Thank you CBS for showcasing the weakness in your position.

It's really too bad that interview segments like this one are almost always cut short just as they're beginning to touch on the real issue. "That's all we have time for - on to the next topic, which we also won't cover in sufficient detail to actually inform viewers."

It drives me nuts that the interviewers squandered their extremely time asking him questions about 2A and not about 1A. After all, that's the real issue. Wilson tried to steer the conversation that way with his answers, but either the interviewers didn't pick up on this fact or they had reason not to go there. Either way, I doubt many fence-sitting viewers walked away from that interview with their minds changed. Had they really dug deep into it and allowed Wilson to fully explain the issue, it would have exposed Wilson's critics as ill-informed and out of touch with the real issue. But we can't have that now can we?

Damn. Cody really kicked some ass there . . . quite impressive.

Cody ran circles around those pricks...…….Haa haa haa haa I love this guy

I don’t think they understood at all what he was getting at. They are also so ill informed with saying ars are banned in 7 states etc. I really love watching cody’s interviews and listening to him speak. He speaks so fluently and pretty quick to the point. Then at the same time is making fun of the people interviewing him and other people who don’t understand what’s really going on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Another excellent example of the talking heads taking a “side”, so as to make an example to the viewers. “See...we’re on television, so we set the example for what opinion our viewers should hold”. Biased news is not news, and I’m happy that he made them look like the idiots that they are. It’s unfortunate that they absolutely control the pace, and therefor content. The viewer is intentionally left with an open ended question that is far more of an intent of purpose, than an actual “discussion”.